Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[TinselKoala]

Well, nobody bothered to reply to my comment from a week ago, where I asked what those "engineers" thought about the "Overunity in VARs" sillyness.

So today I left this comment:

Why do you lie, while asking for money and pretending to sell knowledge you do not possess?

The QEG Canada website says:
"The QEG, based on the work of Nikola Tesla, does not need to be plugged into a centralized power grid. It taps into the quantum field and draws usable electricity from it. A QEG can provide between 10 and 20Kw of power, which exceeds the amount of energy needed to power the average Canadian home."

Note the use of the present tense. This statement is a LIE!

The QEG cannot provide more power than it draws from the mains. There is little resemblance to any of Tesla's patents, and neither you nor anyone else has ever provided any evidence that this device "taps into the quantum field". You cannot even define "the quantum field" in real engineering terms.

[fritz]

Well, nobody bothered to reply to my comment from a week ago, where I asked what those "engineers" thought about the "Overunity in VARs" sillyness.

I agree.

Its  mix of plot #5 and plot#8 OU scam.
Plot #5 is a quite efficient device - and the vision to achieve OU once scaled up to certain point.
Plot #8 is the attempt to alter the timeline - and promote everything expected as already achieved.
A commercial 20kW generator may achieve 97% efficiency, huge ones 99% - 5kW may operate @93% -
so a small generator with few kw achieving 98% is already some invention.
The entire PR with "Tesla Inside" statement is highly questionable.
From electrodynamics point of view -  there is no price to win until you tap and exploit special material properties which allow some net gain.
Its probably nice to play with - but difficult to "believe" as demonstrated.

[MileHigh]

At least Kevin has not deleted the comments on his clips, which I view as a good sign.

[MileHigh]

How does the spinning rotor affect the magnetic flux in the four quadrants of the QEG toroidal core?

If you want to find that out you have to investigate this issue in depth with your scope.  The good news is that in the case of the UK group, I am still going to assume that they have that beautiful four-channel DSO.  That's the one that can give you real-time RMS measurements on each of the four channels, a really nice processing beast of a scope.  I am also assuming that it can export waveforms.

With the DSO there is nothing stopping you from doing that investigation.

So instead of explaining how to do it, which was my first intention, instead I will issue a challenge to James M. Robitaille and Evens Abellard who are working on the new Perspex QEG right now as I post this.

James and Evens:  Please produce various plots (no load, under load, etc.) of the magnetic flux in each of the four quadrants of the QEG and also corelate that with the angular position of the rotor and the power that is flowing into the light bulb load.  Then look at the data and draw conclusions about the flux in each quadrant and the interaction with the spinning rotor.  Do you see a signature that indicates that flux is traveling through the spinning rotor?  What other observations can you give us and what are your conclusions and why are you arriving at them?

All that I can say is that's what I would do.  I am assuming that if the DSO can't integrate on a waveform, then you can export the waveform and do an integration on your PC.

What is the reason for doing all of this?   The reason is that you are looking for alleged "quantum" effects.  Will you see any alleged "quantum" effects or will you see a pure behaviour in the QEG that is in accord with Faraday's Law?

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Ariovaldo, can you reduce the size of your posted image?

Oops, the point is moot, we are at the top of a new page.