Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[TinselKoala]

Who needs a crank start,-she'll be self starting.
If were going to do it,we have to do one better than the QEGer's.

I have already done so, in a device with no wasteful moving parts. Not only does it self-start and auto-resonate, but it makes a higher COP of "OU in VARs" than any mechanical QEG has actually demonstrated. And it does it silently, and on a shoestring budget.

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa-k7J7vO_I22fVc-h8wcdLf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcGTBA7NoVI (included in the playlist above)

[TinselKoala]

Kevin, a person who apparently has no experience building anything, says this:

Resonance is a step that if required before you work towards over unity.  We, and many others, are in the process of pushing the QEG to the next step, which is self running.  Before we can do that, now that we have resonance, we need to fine tune the machine to find its sweet spot (best frequency for resonance).

(sic)

But I say this: No, resonance is just the opposite. It is _preventing_ you from attaining OU. I have built and tested MANY MANY resonant systems and I've documented some of that building and testing in various places. No resonant system attains anything close to "overunity" performance but they all give ample opportunities for error, like the "OU in VARs" claims for the QEG. So, contrary to your UNSUPPORTED claim that resonance is a required step, I present hours and hours of evidence, apparatus after apparatus, that say just the opposite: Resonance is a killer, you will never attain OU in any resonating system.

Come on, Kevin... .PROVE ME WRONG. Show me some evidence that resonance is a step that "if" required before you work towards over unity. I say you cannot. PROVE ME WRONG.

[MarkE]

Kevin, a person who apparently has no experience building anything, says this:(sic)

But I say this: No, resonance is just the opposite. It is _preventing_ you from attaining OU. I have built and tested MANY MANY resonant systems and I've documented some of that building and testing in various places. No resonant system attains anything close to "overunity" performance but they all give ample opportunities for error, like the "OU in VARs" claims for the QEG. So, contrary to your UNSUPPORTED claim that resonance is a required step, I present hours and hours of evidence, apparatus after apparatus, that say just the opposite: Resonance is a killer, you will never attain OU in any resonating system.

Come on, Kevin... .PROVE ME WRONG. Show me some evidence that resonance is a step that "if" required before you work towards over unity. I say you cannot. PROVE ME WRONG.

Have you considered coating resonance with AlO₃ to:  "Seal in all the goodness."?

[tinman]

I have already done so, in a device with no wasteful moving parts. Not only does it self-start and auto-resonate, but it makes a higher COP of "OU in VARs" than any mechanical QEG has actually demonstrated. And it does it silently, and on a shoestring budget.

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa-k7J7vO_I22fVc-h8wcdLf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcGTBA7NoVI (included in the playlist above)

No No No.
There has to be spinny thing's, AND lights to show the OU output -you have to have the light's with spinny thing's that consume power. Without spinny thing's with light's,you have no OU.

For my self running demo on shoe string budget,we will be using a small cooling fan from a PC,some small el'cheapo ceramic disk magnets from the local hobby shop,some super glue,and a small amount of copper wire. Also will need a couple of small pieces of copper plate-cut in the shape of arrow's ,so as the electrons know which way to flow-there a bit silly like that.

So the idea of electron drag power generation,is to have the looping field of the PM's cutting across the copper wire. Then with the magnets rotating,we can drag the electrons through the copper wire,and right into the motor winding's-BUT you must make sure the coils windings are in the center of the north to south magnetic loop,or it just wont work.

Now,if i say this is based around a theory by Nikola Tesla,then everyone should believe in the working principle of the device,and once i show it on youtube,then there can be no doubt it work's-!RIGHT!

[ACG]

Not even one reply over at the last blog:  http://hopegirl2012.wordpress.com/2014/10/02/project-hope-rocks-tesla-lives/#respond

This is a sign of her peeps falling out.