Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

dieter

markdansie, so you think it is not possible to obtain selfoscillation by means of periodic change of inductance or capacitance. So you basicly say this  1934 experiment and the document, that you have read, are made up?
Do you have any technical background at all? Don't answer these metaphoricly meant questions, I won't read it.
BR

MarkE

Dieter when yyou ask someone a question and then declare that you will not read their answer it makes you look like you are closed-minded.

ACG

Quote from: dieter on January 11, 2015, 06:52:18 AM
markdansie, so you think it is not possible to obtain selfoscillation by means of periodic change of inductance or capacitance. So you basicly say this  1934 experiment and the document, that you have read, are made up?
Do you have any technical background at all? Don't answer these metaphoricly meant questions, I won't read it.
BR

!LOL!  Need I say more.

It may be possible to power a city for not just a few pico seconds but indefinately from a volume the size of a AAA battery with some yet to be discover, explored, engineered, managed energy source sans the threat of extinction  from its "unscheduled' release into the environment .  But if I were to promote it today and claim it as working.  Using Ockham's razor, which is more likely.  My interest in donations or my interest is powering a city.  Before you decide know that I have a demonstrated history of making claims and asking for donations.  Its a no-brainer really.

dieter

BTW. this selfoscillation by means of inductance or capacity change (or fluctuation, if you prefer), that markdansie compared to the "flux capacitor" of the movie "back to the future"(effectively calling me an idiot) has nothing to do with the QEG. Those of you with a strange fixation on this thread should know that Woopy confirmed the selfoscillation phenomenon, by practical experiments. And I don't think Woopy is a liar. He certainly contributed more to the community than all the NNs (notorious naysayers) together.


People who call me an idiot make it onto my ignore list, esp. when they have no technical information value. No surprise I won't read their answers. I am just selectively ignorant... for good reasons.


BTW. Doc Browns Delorean was running on Aluminum, which is absolutely doable, once mixed with Gallium, just for those who want to know.


BR

sarkeizen

Quote from: dieter on January 11, 2015, 12:56:57 PM
He certainly contributed more to the community than all the NNs (notorious naysayers) together.
Unlikely.  Nobody in any OU community anywhere has contributed anything about their field to the body of scientific work ever.

Why?  Because the only thing an OU cheerleader can contribute is that OU is clearly and unambiguously real.  Every other outcome can be summed up as:

i) You thought it was real but you were mistaken.
ii) You realize it isn't real.

Both of these are already well documented.