How Steorn Works

[PaulLowrance]

Hi mikestocks2006,

I agree that we should give Steorn the benefit of the doubt. I recall seeing a picture of their machine or one of them and I believe it had electric motors, which consists of coils and magnetic materials.

We should not get our hopes up on Steorn. We should continue our research. When we get attached to something is when we may be hurt and discouraged. If it is true what a physicist told me that Steorn was started by the group within the science community for the purpose of inflicting damage then we should not allow it to affect us.

Lets all please just continue our research regardless what distractions and noise we hear.

One thing that is very important ->

We should always build a machine when the following conditions are met:

1. The inventor claims it is self-running and runs forever or until the machine breaks.
2. The inventor freely publishes the entire exact build instructions.
3. If you can afford to build the machine.

And I would add that it would help if the inventor sounds very sincere and is not hiding anything.  I am not suggesting that we should not build any other devices. Of course we should. I am saying we should always build a machine with the above conditions. It would be a crime if a legitimate inventor publishes the real self-running smoking gun and those with hidden agendas who flood this industry distract us into not building it.

Paul Lowrance

[Jowik]

Steorn's FAQ is being posted in their forum: http://www.steorn.net/forum

Cheers,

John

http://association-steorn.orientalfans.com/steorn

[mikestocks2006]

Hi mikestocks2006,

I agree that we should give Steorn the benefit of the doubt. I recall seeing a picture of their machine or one of them and I believe it had electric motors, which consists of coils and magnetic materials.

We should not get our hopes up on Steorn. We should continue our research. When we get attached to something is when we may be hurt and discouraged. If it is true what a physicist told me that Steorn was started by the group within the science community for the purpose of inflicting damage then we should not allow it to affect us.

Lets all please just continue our research regardless what distractions and noise we hear.

One thing that is very important ->

We should always build a machine when the following conditions are met:

1. The inventor claims it is self-running and runs forever or until the machine breaks.
2. The inventor freely publishes the entire exact build instructions.
3. If you can afford to build the machine.

And I would add that it would help if the inventor sounds very sincere and is not hiding anything.  I am not suggesting that we should not build any other devices. Of course we should. I am saying we should always build a machine with the above conditions. It would be a crime if a legitimate inventor publishes the real self-running smoking gun and those with hidden agendas who flood this industry distract us into not building it.

Paul Lowrance

I think you were referring to a test setup they had on display. The wires are most likely part of the encoders and torque meters.

I think from their chat Q&A and the video and some of their intitial talk on their site, the actual device is all mechanical.

>>Q: Permanent or electric magnets? Or both?
Sean_McCarthy: Permanent
Q: are you saying that the picture on your site is not the actual device?
Sean_McCarthy: As it says in the name of the file it is a test system. Note the torque sensors and angle transducers.
Q: What is the device we see you kneeling next to in the images available on the website?
Sean_McCarthy: That is a test system
<<

Either way, it seems they are doing it the proper way so far, and they will be publishing the results either good or bad.
The burden of proof is on the "jury" now, for the rest of us we can keep an open and objective mind, until the answers are there.
Thx

[PaulLowrance]

Hi mikestocks2006,

I don't see how a 100% mechanical device is going to generate free energy.  Thanks for the quotes. I found some more which also indicate magnetic properties are used, which IMHO would favor a legitimate "free energy" machine

Quotes:

Q: Is this technology apart from magnetism incorporates gravity as well?
Sean_McCarthy: No, the technology is based only on magnetic fields

Q: Permanent or electric magnets? Or both?
Sean_McCarthy: Permanent


Paul Lowrance

[mikestocks2006]

Hi mikestocks2006,

I don't see how a 100% mechanical device is going to generate free energy.  Thanks for the quotes. I found some more which also indicate magnetic properties are used, which IMHO would favor a legitimate "free energy" machine

Quotes:

Q: Is this technology apart from magnetism incorporates gravity as well?
Sean_McCarthy: No, the technology is based only on magnetic fields

Q: Permanent or electric magnets? Or both?
Sean_McCarthy: Permanent


Paul Lowrance

Based on what we are taught so far and most of what we have experienced, I'd agree that it's tough to accept it, 100% mechanical device generating added energy.
But maybe this is the reason for all this to be happening. An anomaly or an unexplained phenomenon, not previously encountered and/or verified by others. I consider magnetic effects as part of an all mechanical system with no coils or wires involved. They said a certain arrangement of magnets/fields had created some unexplained results....

Steorn also mentioned:
"What I said was that we had never connected the technology to a generator, i.e. we have not set it up to produce electrical power, just mechanical. Some may find this strange but you need to understand that the energy involved is mechanical. As stated the technology does self sustain, and hence output is connected to input"

also

"Sorry that I did not answer all your questions. We have run the system through very long cycle runs, stoping it every 600 cycles to test the magnetic domains (there is no errosion on the magnetic domains). The technology produces mechanical energy, and no we have not hooked it up to a generator, instead we have demonstrated power output by moving weights."