The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[sarkeizen]

Yes.  In the specific sense that it is meaningful to the problem at hand - which is measuring the perimeter of a circular path with a time element.  Satisfied?

Nope.  The problem at hand was what the Mathless-Wonder stated, he makes no mention of a time element in that part of his argument.  In fact, if you read it you'll see he's refuting the way an ordinary person would reason.  However I think you can see that he is wrong.

So why not just admit it?  Is the Mathless-wonder somehow perfect?  Is he infallible?

He was wrong.  He was stupid.  He was an idiot.  It happens.

[sarkeizen]

It is you who is not doing what I ask.

Man did I have you pegged.

Just pointing out that you have avoided answering my question but of course you will demand that I answer yours

It's always the same with you guys. 

Do you think pi is a dimensionless constant, or not?

I asked you to define that in terms that are useful to me.  You have refused to do so and have refused to admit you don't understand. Why is that?

[gravityblock]

Nope.  The problem at hand was what the Mathless-Wonder stated, he makes no mention of a time element in that part of his argument.  In fact, if you read it you'll see he's refuting the way an ordinary person would reason.  However I think you can see that he is wrong.

So why not just admit it?  Is the Mathless-wonder somehow perfect?  Is he infallible?

He was wrong.  He was stupid.  He was an idiot.  It happens.

The rectilinear path in the taxicab geometry correctly simulates a time element, and his rectilinear mathematical equations proves this.

Gravock

[sarkeizen]

The rectilinear path in the Manhattan path correctly simulates a time element

However again, if you READ the portion you'll see that he's not talking about a time element, in this part of his argument.

Sorry, it's just the facts.

[gravityblock]

However again, if you READ the portion you'll see that he's not talking about a time element, in this part of his argument.

Sorry, it's just the facts.

In the taxicab geometry, Pi = 4!  This and the rectilinear mathematical equations is evidence of a time element.  It doesn't matter if he's talking about a time element or not, since the taxicab geometry is evidence for there being a time element involved, which plane geometry doesn't take into account.

Gravock