Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

Started by gravityblock, May 06, 2014, 07:16:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

gravityblock

Quote from: MarkE on June 08, 2014, 06:54:50 AM
LOL, is this yet another Mathism that you promote ?  A change in velocity: direction or speed is the result of an acceleration: period.  You are free to try and show actual credible references to experiments that show a change in velocity without acceleration.  You are free to try and show an example of a true instant 90 degree turn taken by anything, anywhere.

The expansion of matter and space are 90o out of phase with one another which gives matter a rectilinear motion through it's surrounding space at any given point in time.  There is a continual interaction between matter and space.  This continual interaction between space and matter induces both an expansion acceleration and a motion (Time).  Orbit and Expansion are One!  Us moving past stationary light via expansion acceleration is what we call gravity.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

gravityblock

Quote from: Pirate88179 on June 08, 2014, 12:45:27 PM
Holy Crap!  Speaking of misdirection....sheesh.  I must have lost like ten I.Q. points reading this gibberish.  Are you really this ignorant or are you just pretending?

Have you never heard of being happy to be "FROM" somewhere?  Does this concept not exist in your little fantasy world over there?  Did you consider that when I lived there it was not like that?  No?  Didn't think so.  I swear, a first grader would not misunderstand my statement the way you have.

OK, here you go:  Do you think it is possible that there might be a few folks that used to live in Detroit and are now happy they are FROM there?  My guess is that would be all of them, but you will probably say none, once again displaying your ignorance for all to see.

You are a minion for ignorance!

Bill

This is another psychological projection by you. 

Bill, my home town has also went down hill, but this is not something I am very proud of.  I would be proud of my home town to see it flourishing, not the other way around.  It is you who is the minion for ignorance, and not me!

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

minnie




    I'm only an old retired farmer with a broken back. I do love a good problem to
  solve.
    To me it looks as if Pi needn't be stuck a 4. With pixels wouldn't matters change
with scale?
    I think Planck lengths aren't really workable, how about going up a few levels
and considering atoms or molecules?
    Let's see some real progress here because in the not too distant future I'm going
to end up on the wrong side of the lawn!
                      John.

gravityblock

Quote from: minnie on June 08, 2014, 02:14:49 PM


    I'm only an old retired farmer with a broken back. I do love a good problem to
  solve.
    To me it looks as if Pi needn't be stuck a 4. With pixels wouldn't matters change
with scale?

    I think Planck lengths aren't really workable, how about going up a few levels
and considering atoms or molecules?

    Let's see some real progress here because in the not too distant future I'm going
to end up on the wrong side of the lawn!
                      John.

With pixels wouldn't matters change with scale?

Let's take a pixel or a square with a perimeter of four units as measured by our ruler having 1 unit (4 units / 1 unit = 4).  After one second, the perimeter becomes eight units, and our ruler now become 2 units, so we measure the square to have the same perimeter of four (8 units / 2 units = 4).  The first pixel or square with a perimeter of four units can represent the planck scale, and the second pixel or square after 1 second with a perimeter of 8 units can represent atoms or molecules.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

sarkeizen

Quote from: gravityblock on June 08, 2014, 10:36:45 AM
It was Pirate Bill of Kentucky who spoke badly about his home town and not me.  I only questioned why he would be very proud of his home town's failed liberal policies and going down hill fast.
Fair enough.  However that doesn't really change the point.  Which was that you had time to make bigoted comments but not answer a clear, useful and jargon-free question.  Which certainly calls into question how seriously anyone should take you.
Quote from: gravityblock on June 08, 2014, 10:54:38 AM
You are not asking the right question.
The answer will clarify your position on a subject I brought up which you claimed was wrong (summarily before asking a single question).  Hence it is a correct question to be asking.