COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[web000x]

Fall time does not have a relation to switching frequency.  It is a function of how fast charge can be driven into the MOSFET gate, and the MOSFET's characteristics: particularly drain to gate capacitance.  Pick an appropriate MOSFET, pair it with a good driver, layout the circuit properly and you can get really fast rise and fall times.

Yeah, I understand that.  Sorry about the shortness of my original post.  I'm more curious about slowing the switching frequency down because I'm sure the inductance @270khz in that circuit is causing an impedance which is limiting current.  From my experiements, faster fall times are easier with smaller currents.  I'm just curious if the circuit would still show fall times of 5 ns with heavy current flow.


Dave

[TinselKoala]

Well, here are the scopeshots at maximum (~272 kHz) and minimum (~2.5 kHz) and the board layout.

[web000x]

Well, here are the scopeshots at maximum (~272 kHz) and minimum (~2.5 kHz) and the board layout.

Wow, thank you for that detailed imagery.  I've been poking around with Babcock's switching technology.  I'm trying to get everything as close to right as possible before I start buying semiconductors.  This helps a lot as to what my options are.


I think I've figured out some novelties in the SERPS based off of Eric Dollard's description of EMF vs electrostatic voltage.  It lines up with the hints that Paul and Jim have given us.  Jim hints that his circuit is operating on a distinction between EMF, E, and electrostatic voltage, e.  Paul mentions that a center tapped transformer is key to getting 'magic' to happen.  Mark Mckay's interview with Paul indicates the SERPS was originally designed with two loads (Two loads lumped into one at the 2014 conference, hence two light bulbs).  These details are key in the theory that I'm about to lay out.


Let's take a look at some simple circuit diagrams.  First we have a few different capacitor arrangements, this all being analyzed simply by using Psi = eC, lines of dielectric force.


Single Capacitor

e = 10 volts, C = 10 Farad
Psi = 10v*10F = 100 Lines of Dielectric Force


Two Capacitors in Parallel

e1 = 10 volts, C1 = 10 Farad, e2 = 10 volts, C2 = 10 Farad
Psi = 10v*(10F + 10F) = 10v*20F = 200 Lines of Dielectric Force


Two Capacitors in Series

e1 = 10 volts, C1 = 10 Farad, e2 = 10 volts, C2 = 10 Farad
Psi = (10v+10v)*((10F*10F)/(10F + 10F)) = 20v*5F = 100 Lines of Dielectric Force


WE'VE LOST HALF THE CHARGE!!!


You can clearly see that discharging capacitors in this configuration forfeits 1/2 of the lines of dielectric force.



However, in this configuration where the center tap is used, there is a mathematical conservation of dielectric lines of force in the total system by separating into two conjoined systems.



Although this conservation of charge doesn't show any difference in RC time constants of the total system, it does beg the question of what exactly it was that Jim Murray was speaking of when he spoke about needing to know the difference between the EMF, E, and voltage, e, in the generator windings.  See video reference: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-chHnLyHVF8[/size]  9:20-10:25


It would seem that there is some type of conservation in a force going on that has otherwise been taken for granted.  The interactions of the quadrapolar forms of electricity, { E, e, I, i }, are probably doing something novel,  especially since I=Dielectric Lines of force divided by time, Psi/t.  Right now, I am unable to take any theoretical ideas to the next level due to my overall lack in understanding, but this is worth investigating on the bench since it is the only thing novel that I've found that engenders all of the tips and hints that Paul and Jim have given us.


Here is a proposal of how they pulled off the DC measurements of the load at the 2014 conference.



I have been wanting to build this for months but have been really looking into the details since and have been patient so far.  Finally, I'm at a point where I want to buy semiconductors and unexpected bills hit.  Yay...  This is me giving this idea to you guys so that maybe someone who is better equipped than I can take this forward.  And I need this thread to light back up.  This is the one for which we've been waiting.


Dave


PS   Pictures are in order relative to the links above.

[web000x]

If anybody knows how to insert images into your posts instead of links or lumping all of the pics at the bottom, let me know.

[ATOM1]

10 F at 10v is 100 watts over one second ! but if you pules it a compression wave is produced and its nothing with the dielectric or rather the dynamic harmonic response ! the term for dielectric is now out dated as all emf is in fact just resonance and that is just harmonic boundaries of force !

There is a mass density increase and is why you get more lights per charge ect ! That is due to the event horizons on the electrons attempting to increase in the out side diameter ... That means that there event horizon is speeding up ! Keep it simple and dump the data bomb ! This is a matter of quantum mechanics not electrical engineering ....

The event horizon for an electron is spinning at 10% to the speed of light, but if you  increase the speed than its obvious you have gained power but not more energy ! power and energy are not the same. That may sound nuts but in fact its true power is the total mass over speed energy is the conversion of the power.

The central EQ position for the pulse connection is important but its not as good as a set of harmonic positions set out in quantized values along the central harmonic plane on the inside diameter of the coils ! Also adding other free electrons from priming the primary coils with silver gold platinum is most advisable !

I am building 10 , 1 000 000 watt advanced systems of this kind ! Also the dynamic interphase for electron density along the harmonic is quantized by default between the fth note dynamic of electron scales ! you need to know the quanta of electrons per mm of wire and the distance between them .. This set up only works with DC pulse input with the correct cap banks ! look at the wire as string rather than a length of resistance !

The end result is always 10 times more kinetic power available and no more than that ! But the energy conversion of the power depends dramatically on the values of harmonic receiving loads ! A load is also a string !

Sorry to sound like mr know it all but in fact I do hahah

ATOM1