COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[Meta]

From page 22

There may be much more than what is presently believed
to this device.  Apparently much more than simply charging
and discharging capacitors or inductors at critical points
repetitively within each cycle of Input (well timed periods
of Taking then Giving Back) Voltage and Current.

What would it take to perfect the illusion of being able to
return to the Source nearly all of the power extracted by
the load;  in such a way that power measurement devices
are incapable of recognizing the illusion?

Meta: Access the high freq and high voltage of the 4th dimension that measuring instruments cant reach.

Is it a scheme of high speed extraction and return of energy
for very brief periods multiple times during the duration of
each Input Cycle?

Meta: Very brief....nano seconds.

Obviously, whatever is taking place to produce the "Magic"
is quite complex and at a considerably higher frequency than
the power line.  Why else would the device need electronic
switches which are capable of nanoSecond speeds?

Meta: The magic comes when we recognize these 3 dimensions are actual 6. Or, they recognize these 3 need the 4th where the HF/HV is and then they feed it back into the circuit at least 2 times in one cycle.

It is a very clever scheme, to be sure.  Playing Ponzi on the
Source with what appears to be reliability.

[Meta]

From page 25

Meta: I think this is worth forwarding.

This is a description I found elsewhere that sums up what is happening.
Barry


SERPS & Dynaflux

The most important thing to understand is that Power and Energy are two completely different things.

Energy is measured in joules as a finite quantity with no respect to time

Power is measured in joules per second with respect to time

Theoretically you can derive an almost infinite amount of power from a small amount of energy. It all depends on the time frame. However there is another aspect to this that Jim Murray introduces that is particularly novel.

In conventional electrical terms it is thought energy can be only used once, and that all the energy is contained within the magnetic and dielectric fields.

Jim Murray makes the point that energy can be used multiple times over giving more power than has traditionally been thought possible. This "extra" energy comes from a momentum like component in electricity that has been largely ignored in the scientific community.

"Maxwell thought that all the electrical energy was carried in the magnetic and electrical fields. 30 years later Einstein and De Haas found that there was addition energy that was carried by the current itself and not by the fields. (They decided not to correct this.)

In a normal situation the reactive power is defined as a form of restorative power in which the average value is zero. The problem with that is the current and voltages are usually out of phase by 90 degrees so that you cannot use it. What this devise allows you to do is create watts that go back and forth doing the same thing and the watts become reactive."

This understanding forms the crux of Jim Murray's invention

Reactive Power: This instantly confuses pretty much everyone listening to Jim Murray. Most people when they hear the terms "reactive power" think current and voltage that are out of phase as in the traditional sense. THIS IS NOT WHAT JIM MURRAY MEANS. When current and voltage are out of phase you get the units called a "var". When they are in phase you get real power in kW.

The condition of reactance is created by the phenomena of reflection. In normal reactive power a portion of the current independent of voltage is reflected meaning it is sent back to the source.

In Jim Murray's case however current AND voltage are reflected back to the source at the same time and are considered "reactive" however in this case they are both in phase and thus instead of being reactive "vars" they are considered reactive "kW".

This ability for energy to reflect on the same line causes an increase of power without violating the law of conservation of energy! This is what he terms Energy Resonance, which is NOT the same as frequency resonance.
This is the principle behind the SERPS technology which really was initially developed by Tesla when creating his Tesla Magnifying Transmitter. Reflection is what creates a standing wave and this while a well known phenomenon has some unique effects in electrical terms.
While it us unclear to me if the Dynaflux makes use of "Energy Resonance" in the reflected way... it does something else to recycle energy. The alternator works on the principle of pulsing a large magnetic field and causing a rotor to spin based on geometry. The energy used to pulse the rotor is recovered/recaptured and then sent back to the input. This is very similar to the Bedini spike capture technology in principle. It is also what Paul Babcock is attempting to do with his motor.
The unique thing about the dynflux is that it creates a rather interesting almost paradoxical case.
From the patent:
Overall Motor Efficiency=79.84%
"Apparent System Efficiency=2,606.296 watts/918.758 watts×100%=283.676%.

It's the recovery of the energy used to spin the motor which creates this over-unity like condition.

Again energy can be recycled, more than thought possible leading to above 100% efficiency from a conventional point of view.

To reiterate, this is NOT free energy or a break in the law of conservation. This merely requires a paradigm change in what we think is possible to do with a finite quantity of energy. Eventually ALL the energy does get used up and released as heat, so this is NOT a perpetual motion machine. It can not be bootstrapped as one might think 100%+ efficiency implies.

The dynalfux or the SERPS will always require energy input, it's just that they need less energy and can create more power. You can even send back more power than you are using, however you can not send back more energy than you are using.

Again the distinction between energy and power needs to be made crystal clear here.

[Meta]

From page 26

Hey Mark,


It is actually of more help that you'd realize.  It just so happens that between this post and another post in the Energetic  Forum that you made that I've pieced together some more of the puzzle in my head.  I've been studying the scant amount of SERPS imagery from Aaron's website and from watching the conference presentation.  It seems from the wires that are leaving the prototype board terminals and going to the load, caps and transformer that they are using 6 different switches.  This would line up with them being able to arrange a parallel charge/series discharge in both polarities of the 60 Hz sine wave. 


I've been reading over Eric Dollard's work on the differences of EMF and voltage, as well as MMF and displacement current and how they apply to power production.  I think I'm starting to see something come together that might be useful and engineerable.  I just need to get a switching scheme down so I can take it to the bench.


Thanks,


Dave

How many wires, corresponding to how many switches: 6

How many dimensions in our 3 dimensions? 6

Pay attention people, these are not just coincidences.

Remember the Law of 3,6,9.

[Meta]

Maybe you should go to one of those schools you despise so much.  You have that theory exactly backwards.  Electrons are negatively charged so they go from negative to positive.  And the holes move in the opposite direction.  Or is it that things in your Meta World work backwards to the real world?

You're correct in this one thing. I do work backward from you. Also, the Other side is diametrically opposite to This side. DNA strands move opposite. The Mayan Calendar moves opposite halves. The chinese I-Ching moves in opposite halves. The human brain moves as opposite halves, the left brain (rational) is opposite the right brain (intuitive psyche). Our 3+1 dimensions has an opposite 5,6,7+1. Modern electrodynamic formulae have an equal and opposite set of backward formulae...the complete set are called Octonions.

[SeaMonkey]

So the trick then is to achieve an electrical
"pushing back" against the source while at
the same time extracting power to accomplish
some work.

Without some sort of "timing diagram" to
illustrate how this is done it is very difficult to
comprehend.

Is the "taking" and "returning" done at a fairly
high frequency with short pulses over the
complete duration of each cycle of input from
the source?

Or, is it done differently?