Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


How does one conclusively prove the validity of an overunity device on a video?

Started by phaedrus, May 11, 2014, 04:56:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: Lancair-ES on May 18, 2014, 04:26:24 AM
I feel that there has been a big confusion between being a sceptic and being a realistic person. We all know that achieving overunity isn't that realistic.
Sceptics are people who doubts the validity of overunity, or think that things are possible in theory, but very hard to achieve in practice.
Realists are people who knows that the validity of overunity are false, and consequently cannot be done in practice.


There are more realists that sceptics in here I think. I am a realist, not a spetic (in my opinion  :D  )
Technically, a skeptic is just a person who judges based on available evidence.  A cynic is someone who adheres to a belief system regardless of the available evidence. 

Over unity per se may be something that is very unlikely to ever be found.  But new sources of energy are still quite possible.  When a new source is found, if it is not recognized it will appear to be over unity.  I'll take whatever we can find that is:  cleaner, and hopefully cheaper and more practical than fossil fuel and the old style light water pressurized nukes.

cheappower2012

To MarkE
Sometimes its very hard to figure out a skeptic a few of the other major
skeptics here believe a free energy device is impossible,and even if possible it could never
come from anyone here(unwashed ignorant  masses)  not said in this manner, but have implied this.
So what is your opinion, do you think its possible a real free energy device could come from someone on this forum.

ramset

Lancair
Quote
achieving  OU isn't that realistic. Sceptics are people who doubts the validity of OU or think that things are possible in theory, but very hard to achieve in practice.Realists are people who knows that the validity of Overunity are false, and consequently cannot be done in practice.


end quote


So I walk down the street the sky grows dark and I feel or hear a sound like a whisper that goes thru your toes to your scalp .....and BAAAM Flash
all hell breaks loose    a thunderstorm balancing the power flowing thru the atmosphere from the star 93 million miles away communing with the huge spinning mass of molten metal at the center of the planet....


Overunity ??
Naah no way we could ever figure that out ,  never happen,  where do you see evidence  or even a remote possibility that there could be excess energy looking for a  place to go ?


its not like energy is  falling from the sky or staring you right in the face...


silly guys


here is how far science has gone with something as complex and mind boggling as static electricity


http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation
[thx to wavewatcher for the link]


Mark E don't play for money with the man in the Cheappower suit [he will win]


8)
thx
Chet
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

MarkE

Quote from: cheappower2012 on May 18, 2014, 09:15:22 PM
To MarkE
Sometimes its very hard to figure out a skeptic a few of the other major
skeptics here believe a free energy device is impossible,and even if possible it could never
come from anyone here(unwashed ignorant  masses)  not said in this manner, but have implied this.
So what is your opinion, do you think its possible a real free energy device could come from someone on this forum.
I think that it is very unlikely.  If in the unlikely event someone comes up with strong evidence  then it is only fair to objectively evaluate that evidence.

Lancair-ES

Quote from: ramset on May 18, 2014, 09:40:11 PM
Lancair
Quote
achieving  OU isn't that realistic. Sceptics are people who doubts the validity of OU or think that things are possible in theory, but very hard to achieve in practice.Realists are people who knows that the validity of Overunity are false, and consequently cannot be done in practice.


end quote


So I walk down the street the sky grows dark and I feel or hear a sound like a whisper that goes thru your toes to your scalp .....and BAAAM Flash
all hell breaks loose    a thunderstorm balancing the power flowing thru the atmosphere from the star 93 million miles away communing with the huge spinning mass of molten metal at the center of the planet....


Overunity ??
Naah no way we could ever figure that out ,  never happen,  where do you see evidence  or even a remote possibility that there could be excess energy looking for a  place to go ?


its not like energy is  falling from the sky or staring you right in the face...


silly guys


here is how far science has gone with something as complex and mind boggling as static electricity


http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation
[thx to wavewatcher for the link]


Mark E don't play for money with the man in the Cheappower suit [he will win]


8)
thx
Chet
I obviously misspelled a LOT, or just put wrong words in the wrong order in my comment. I dot NOT believe in OU  ;) . I just tried with my locally learned English, here in some other country than England or the US, to explain the difference between a sceptic and a realist.


Scepsism does not occour from the one who has the knowledge, but from the one who does not. A realist (should) have the knowledge to say "No it wont work" instead of being sceptic. That was my point  :)