1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[i_ron]

Ron


they seem to be moved in pairs 180 degrees to one another. You can see what looks like a beam moving too and frow driven by the motor of course


regards


Mike

Hi Mike,


The beam is just an artifact, I think... but here is Luc's loop vid slowed down


I can see the eccentric arm driving the top of the rod in a neat circle, watch the pivot point
of the arm and it does not change position back and forth but is quite stationary regardless
of the "beam" shadow behind...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLwQBhakSFk

Bit of a loss on youtube but clearer on my original


Luc,


kudos on that vid incidentally, what did you use?


Ron

[Craigy]

Sorry ron , i was trying to get a concensus of opinion....I want to find the answer through experiment not through argument

so built that gimble thingy

[gotoluc]

Luc,


kudos on that vid incidentally, what did you use?


Ron

Hi Ron,

the reason I used this site to host the looped video and not youtube is they loose quality when you upload them to youtube.

The reason I uploaded that first looped video is you can see a crank arm at the very top with a fixed central point turning the upper shaft in a circle. This was my first attempt to point out that the upper shaft is turned in a circle. Not many piked up on it. I guess we see what we chose to believe.

I have a question for you. Which of the two weights do you believe is the one Mr. Skinner refers to as falling?

Luc

[gotoluc]

Sorry ron , i was trying to get a concensus of opinion....I want to find the answer through experiment not through argument

so built that gimble thingy

Hi Craigy,

can you please reduce the size of your pictures as it makes it difficult to read the posts with images of that size.

Thanks

[Craigy]

been trying ever since i posted, but it won't let me in