1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[centraflow]

Nice pictures Luc


If you look at the second one you can see quite plainly how the top of the botton shaft is made, it is a stub end into the bottom shaft, it has to turn and slightly move in and out of it, not much but it moves, the overall length changes as it moves through the ellipse. I have said this before we knew about this photo, if it doesn't do this it will lock to the input power at its stress point in the ellips.


Pitty we don't have more good quality photos at different angles, especially the top drive of the levers, but I'm sure I have it right.


regards


Mike


PS. I have also worked out that the system controls itself, I have posted this on the EF topic thread, this man was totally brilliant.


regards


Mike

[ARMCORTEX]

If you have it right, then plz make the sketch so that we understand the top synchronizer.

If you are a true craftsman, you would know how to make it.

After much deliberation, using logic and elimination, I have concluded that the top part is but a synchroniser, so that one motor can move many different orbits, and that the size and height has nothing to do with needed leverage but by geometrical constraints. And it probably was a pain in the ass to adjust so that it worked well.

Knowing this,its up for debate wich is better, 4 seperate smaller motors that are electronically controlled for an emilation of phase shift, or the top part, with the synchronizer.

To synchronize the proper out of phasing of all ellipse orbits. Because with these gravity devices, only a small window is open for us to tap energy, now  where  that is I dont know, the thin part of ellipse, big part, is there 2 of these windows per orbit each thin part ? 8 small windows of oportuniy.

But if you arrange the phasing right so that the ''window is always open'' on the main shaft, ahhh....

[not_a_mib]

The weight motion and base bearing operation resembles that in the bottom cone of the David Hamel 3-cone device.

[gotoluc]

Update,

Elliptical mechanism in operation without lever connected: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn_gI1Ae6d8

Elliptical mechanism failed to operate correctly with lever connected: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4wvNRO4_MU

This mechanism needs too much precision for experiments.

I'm also starting to think 2 gravity units 180 degrees out of phase may be required to balance out the motor (prime mover) input.
Also we don't understand how the primary input mechanism is made, so we're working in the dark.
I'm now starting to think the input mechanism is connected to the lever shaft rotation. You can see when Mr. Skinner turns the lever by hand and the input pulley turns. I've noticed this for a while but it didn't connect till now.

Luc

[sterlinga]

I've posted a feature page about this at http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:William_F._Skinner%27s_1939_Gravity_Motor