Akula eternal lantern 4

[MileHigh]

The Earth's magnetic field is for all purposes static at any given location on the planet's surface.  Ergo there is no changing flux to be intercepted.  Ergo there is no induction to be tapped.

Yes indeed.  All that you have to do is open up a science book and read and understand to understand this simple fact.

[Void]

People say lots of things.  What they demonstrate is something else.

The Earth's magnetic field is for all purposes static at any given location on the planet's surface.  Ergo there is no changing flux to be intercepted.  Ergo there is no induction to be tapped.  Ergo any claim of "tapping into the Earth's magnetic field somehow" is utter BS.  QED.

Using words like ergo and QED doesn't make your comments any more convincing to me.
They of course could be wrong about the Earth's magnetic field explanation, but if they are wrong about
that, that still doesn't necessarily mean the device doesn't work. They may just not really understand what
is really making it tick. This is all besides the point, because when it comes down to it, any investor who is on
the ball at all will insist on a thorough testing under their own conditions before giving them any money.
All the best...

[MarkE]

Yes indeed.  All that you have to do is open up a science book and read and understand to understand this simple fact.

Or one can open up a pocket compass and set it down.

[MarkE]

Using words like ergo and QED doesn't make your comments any more convincing to me.
They of course could be wrong about the Earth's magnetic field explanation, but if they are wrong about
that, that still doesn't necessarily mean the device doesn't work. They may just not really understand what
is really making it tick. This is all besides the point, because when it comes down to it, any investor who is on
the ball at all will insist on a thorough testing under their own conditions before giving them any money.
All the best...

Well, I suppose it is possible that you were never introduced to formal logic in school, or how a proof works.
They make a claim that defies established experience.  They fail to offer any compelling evidence in favor of their claim.  Ergo they offer nothing to dispute the established experience they wish to defy.  Ergo their claims fail.

[Void]

Well, I suppose it is possible that you were never introduced to formal logic in school, or how a proof works.
They make a claim that defies established experience.  They fail to offer any compelling evidence in favor of their claim.  Ergo they offer nothing to dispute the established experience they wish to defy.  Ergo their claims fail.

Hi MarkE. You are too much mate.
All the best...