Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

My fundamental point is that your propositions don't make sense

Im going to (try) teach you a lesson it seems you cannot learn son.

When you make a CLAIM over and over and over, and give no reasons, no logic, no evidence for it,    merely stating "you're wrong" to myself 5 times over and over and over.

Thats called a "restating the claim fallacy".    Go look it up son.




same double hyperbola and accretion disk as seen in galactic jets

[MileHigh]

That beautiful colour image you see on the CRT screen is being produced because of the presence of a classic 'donut' shaped toroidal magnetic field produced by the disk magnet!  I swear!

[TheoriaApophasis]

That beautiful colour image you see on the CRT

CRT demo is only ONE demo out of 6 different ones I use.     If you, pathetically, think Im merely using CRT as a demo AND/OR proof, then you are deluded.

[MileHigh]

CRT demo is only ONE demo out of 6 different ones I use.     If you, pathetically, think Im merely using CRT as a demo AND/OR proof, then you are deluded.

You are trying to change the subject!  You are still looking at a donut.

In a couple of places in your clips you comment about the concept of 'electrical inertia' in a coil and you relate that to a flywheel.  I apologize I can't find were you state that in your clips again it would take too long.  That is a valid concept but the problem is that your description of what was 'under the hood' went into vectors and other stuff.  Can you comment on that and describe the analogy?  Then I will comment.

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

your clips you comment about the concept of 'electrical inertia' in a coil

I refer to electrical engineering texts referring to dielectricity as "electrical inertia"

JC Maxwell says the same thing.   So does Oliver Heaviside.


Heard of them, (i assume)?