Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[steeltpu]

officialy off topic.

popcorn time ratings:
scale 1 - 10 stars

TheoriaApophasis:  10 stars
Milehigh: 1 star

Tinsel Koala: -1 star

negative stars created special for TK   
TheoriaApophasis almost lost one star for calling them son because they are actually the other gender.

carry on girls

[TinselKoala]

@Tinselkoala......
I realize that you have got miffed and may be in plan B of now engaging in a War Of Words. However.....

During the late 1800s there was widespread belief in the physics community that inertia and momentum (and even,you know, gravity  ) was explained by electric and magnetic field actions and reactions. It was variously described as electric inertia, magnetic inertia, electromagnetic inertia, whatever.   

Surely you remember that.


CANGAS 53

Let me remind you of the original statement:

I refer to electrical engineering texts referring to dielectricity as "electrical inertia"

JC Maxwell says the same thing.   So does Oliver Heaviside.


Heard of them, (i assume)?

So where is the reference that supports the actual claim made by our Tattooed Genius? Show me where Heaviside or Maxwell or an "electrical engineering text" refers to dielectricity as "electrical inertia".

Have you forgotten how to cite a reference too? Posting an image of a frontispiece is not how it's done. 

Once you've found your reference and can cite it properly, we will move on to see if that definition (if you can find it) applies to the color patterns one sees with green magnetic field viewing film.

[TinselKoala]

officialy off topic.

popcorn time ratings:
scale 1 - 10 stars

TheoriaApophasis:  10 stars
Milehigh: 1 star

Tinsel Koala: -1 star

negative stars created special for TK   
TheoriaApophasis almost lost one star for calling them son because they are actually the other gender.

carry on girls

Do you even know how a "magnet" is created?   dumped charged capacitor banks spin up in geometric magneto-dielectric incommensurability the magnetic and dielectric fields to MAKE the specific geometry.


As a crude analogy, that "bloch wall" is the dielectric 'flywheel' that is powering the macro-magnetic phenomena that people think makes it "a magnet"

What a HOOT! You people really crack me up. "SteelTPU" whose name reflects one of the biggest hoaxes ever put out on the internet, and the Tattooed Genius spouting gobbledegook and insults! Great thread folks! Meanwhile... television sets work, but the Genius can't explain them, and TPUs don't work, but he can explain them just fine.

Go ahead, cut a bar magnet in half along the "Bloch Wall". Funny sort of slippery "wall" isn't it, that suddenly doubles itself, moves around, and now you have two, one in each half of your original magnet. That's OU, two from one!

[TinselKoala]

.....

I have an invention however I have only shown 4 people that gives about a 20+ second demonstration window of a genuine tornado-like vortex over any magnet.
A patent lawyer I used before has been contacted and I meet next week.

That 8th device, my invention, you will not see, because nothing like it exists, and I am going to patent it.
Believe that, fine, dont believe it, I also dont care.


As stated, I have NO interest in converting or convincing ANYONE of anything.


Lux et Veritas

That must be why you are arguing with and insulting people on the Overunity Open Source Forum website. I understand you a lot better now.

[SeaMonkey]

Go ahead, cut a bar magnet in half along the "Bloch Wall". Funny sort of slippery "wall" isn't it, that suddenly doubles itself, moves around, and now you have two, one in each half of your original magnet. That's OU, two from one!

Not unless each retains the strength of the original.

Really nothing strange about how certain manifestations
are able to find their proper center in whatever medium
they may exist.

Suddenly the Champion of Self-Study and Research becomes
the crybaby demanding to be spoon-fed.

Old-Age making its debut?