Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[CANGAS]

Faraday, Cramp Norgrove, and also later published experiments have proved conclusively that the magnetic field does not move even though its magnet source moves. Theoria has been advised of this and has perfectly failed to address this issue.

Still Theoria harangues us to believe that His magnetic field whirls in a vortex. Like a dizzy dancing dervish.

When pigs fly. Without even flapping their little tiny wings.


CANGAS 56

[TheoriaApophasis]

Faraday, Cramp Norgrove, and also later published experiments have proved conclusively that the magnetic field does not move even though its magnet source moves.

Haaaaaaa!!  You just hung yourself high with that one, ......proving you never read my book       


However that is NOT what Faraday said, he said that the "source of the magnet" ......."was moving (as polarized) the magnetic tubes (or what we now call lines)"

All fundamental forces are Aether modalities,  I state EXACTLY WHAT YOU said in merely a different way, just as I stated in the book.

I endless state in the book that ALL "magnets" are really electrified dielectric objects OF WHICH THE "driver" of the magnetism is dielectricity.



Your PEDESTRIAN understanding of the term FIELD however is prematurely flawed, since there is no such thing AS a "static field" and since space and time are POSTERIOR to ALL fields, then the causative links between induction, and supposed "mutual induction" (a HUGE fallacy) and "moving field" and what is MOVED IN A FIELD are 2 different things, son.

This is how field reactions are instant, they are definitionally not CAUSATIVE IN SPACE (see below).




Yes, there is a magnetic vortex, that is 'driven' by the dielectric inertial plane.


Suggest next time, before you pathetically ATTEMPT to criticize someone, you actually READ the book first.        Pathetic     


And, son, I am more well read on Faraday than yourself, I know EXACTLY what he said.


However Heaviside and Maxwell are a wee bit more evolved in magnetic theory than Faraday for obvious reasons I wont fault Faraday for.


You amuse me as well son.  

Read below and LEARN something son.


(October 14, 1922, Kharkiv, Ukraine - May 14, 2009, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA) - physicist and Professor Emeritus at West Virginia University.

Biography

Jefimenko received his B.A. at Lewis and Clark College (1952). He received his M. A. at the University of Oregon (1954). He received his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon (1956). Jefimenko has worked for the development of the theory of electromagnetic retardation and relativity. In 1956, he was awarded the Sigma Xi Prize. In 1971 and 1973, he won awards in the AAPT Apparatus Competition. Jefimenko has constructed and operated electrostatic generators run by atmospheric electricity.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Still Theoria harangues us to believe that His magnetic field whirls in a vortex.

I have the videos, the pictures, the proof, the logic, and 9 TOTAL testing medium for this.


and you?  You have your flapping lips.       


One of those is worth something, the other is 100% WORTHLESS     


Keep dancing for me son.



What, in your weak mind did you THINK a "magnet" was other than a fixed-power solenoid???   ROFL   

I bet you dont even know HOW A MAGNET IS MADE

[TheoriaApophasis]

Still Theoria harangues us to believe that His magnetic field whirls in a vortex. Like a dizzy dancing dervish.

Pathetic child,  ALMOST ALL of (even those I despise in) in physics acknowledge magnetic vortex movements   


They call it the "pinch effect of a magnetic field"



Now guess what is "doing the pinching", thats right, dielectricity.


Suggest you go "wise up" somewhere with a good book and learn something 




And below is the formula for same:

[gravityblock]

Faraday, Cramp Norgrove, and also later published experiments have proved conclusively that the magnetic field does not move even though its magnet source moves. Theoria has been advised of this and has perfectly failed to address this issue.

Still Theoria harangues us to believe that His magnetic field whirls in a vortex. Like a dizzy dancing dervish.

When pigs fly. Without even flapping their little tiny wings.


CANGAS 56

Wrong!  The endless debate as to where the voltage is truly generated and if the field rotates with the magnet or not has been put to rest. The Lorentz force is nothing more than the Z-D force viewed from the proper inertial system of a permanent magnet (see reference link below). The field of a permanent magnet is magneto-static. The movement of the magnetic source causes the Z-D effect which has been termed magneto-kinematic. A magneto-static field does not meet the requirement for wave motion and moves like a body synchronously with its source. Nevertheless, the magnetic field satisfies Faraday's law just like any electromagnetic wave.

The phase shift (see image or reference link below) cannot be explained if the magnetic field is considered to be immobile, but is readily explained by the rotation of the magnetic field with the magnet.  The magnetic field moves with it's source!

The electrometer mentioned in the article is a way to perform truly "single piece" voltage measurements without having to close the loop, which raises the endless question as to where the voltage is truly generated. The open probe circuit is easily constructed and has a sensitivity of detecting 1 volt, which is ridiculously high. Credit goes to broli for bringing this open probe circuit to our attention.


1.) Zajev-Dokuchajev (Z-D) effect: the moving of the magnetic field with the rotating magnet.

Gravock