Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

as shown by TinMan's incomplete and half-ass experiment is because:
Gravock

Listen up son,  There isnt one person on this board other than YOURSELF who thinks  Tinmans experiments are ANYTHING but logical, well, done, experimental, intelligent, and excellent examples.


Tinman DID THE "DO"


You,  like MilesOnHigh, are flapping your lips, and only that.

[gravityblock]

You have a mental defect son.   A GIGANTIC ONE


The EARTH SPINS


Its FIELD  has conjugate RECIPROCATION,   CW ,and CCW,     Centrifugal and Centripetal.   Divergent and Convergent.


If, in your insanity you think the spinning / rotating earth  is = (the above highlighted),      then you need your head examined son.



Seek mental help 



Now, go find a NAIL, and sit on it and spin /rotate.      You have no idea what the hell has been said in the last few posts.

OR, you DO, but are ignoring same to save face,   which is pure pathetic hubris.

You say in the above that the earth spins, and its field has conjugate reciprocation, CW/CCW, Centrifugal/Centripetal, Divergent and Convergent.  And then in your very next sentence you say I need my head examined if I I think the spinning/rotating earth is = to the same field properties of the earth in which you just assigned to it in your previous sentence, lol!  Let me clarify this a little better, since you are a little slow:

The EARTH SPINS.  Its FIELD  has conjugate RECIPROCATION, CW/CCW, Centrifugal/Centripetal, Divergent/Convergent.

If, in your insanity you think the spinning/rotating earth  is = (conjugate RECIPROCATION, CW/CCW, Centrifugal/Centripetal, Divergent/Convergent), then you need your head examined son.  It is you who need your head examined by thinking that the portion on the left side of the equal sign is not the same as the portion on the right side of the equal sign since you assigned both sides of the equal sign with the same field properties, lol.

Don't drink the bong water, lol!

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

Gravock

I dont know if you're drunk, or part insane, or both.    Could'nt care less. 


Since you dont know the difference between  ROTATE (on X, or XY axis)    and  RECIPROCATE,   suggest you go back to school and slap the teacher that "taught" you. 


Both, SON, are "movement".....   both are, in a manner "resultant of displacement / charge / fields".

Go make your coil rotate/spin.     That, son, IS NOT centrifugal/centripetal   divergent/convergent conjugate field reciprocation..



I suspect you are drunk or insane,  not that anyone gives a hoot in hell.

[Farmhand]

How is it that bubbles rising in water the conclusion makes ?

How do we explain the vortexian structures in the smoke and flames of a fire ?

Or the vortex in the plughole when we let the water out ?

Do they all point to a magnetic field being a vortex as well ?

If not what does the presence of these other vortex structures suggest to us ?

Cheers

Fire tornadoes in Australian outback. I think I see at one stage the thin smoke is forming a large slow vortex while in the center
there is a thin very fast spinning and fast rising vortex of fire inside it @ 1:22.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsyvOYcWgcg

Now are we to assume there is an inverted magnetic vortex in the earth wherever there is a wind/ fire or water vortex ?
And a dielectric plane at about the Earths surface level ?

I think fluids naturally form a vortex when it can due to the movement of the fluid. Because it is an efficientway for it to happen,
just as water will find the easiest route down a hill a fluid will find the easiest way to rise "smoke/fire/bubbles" or
fall "water down a sink hole".

..
..

[TheoriaApophasis]

How is it that bubbles rising in water the conclusion makes ?

Or the vortex in the plughole when we let the water out ?
Do they all point to a magnetic field being a vortex as well ?
If not what does the presence of these other vortex structures suggest to us ?
Cheers

Suggest you take a peek at the PICS below and REALLY contemplate them, not LOOK,    but THINK

Plug drain vortex?,...  Field pressure mediation, pulled plug, void of LOW PRESSURE present, the fastest way to bleed HIGH to LOW PRESSURE IS A VORTEX (and vice versa),  Natures 'lines' are ALL curved.   Nature doesnt "do" LINES

Rising bubbles are forming the vortex OFF THE MAGNET, not the steel slug when zapped, NOT the electromagnet,    NOR will you (obviously) get same by simplex water hydrolysis



>>>>If not what does the presence of these other vortex structures suggest to us ? <<<<


Suggests NOTHING,  TELLS you everything.    This is the 'mechanics of fields' in conjugation.


I explain ALL THIS IN THE BOOK, its free for Pete's sake,    I dont want a penny, download it and READ it.


Its not as if I ask anyone TO BUY ANYTHING,   because Im not selling.    Im retired.


If you want to forget about CRT and zapping a magnet,  FINE,   there are many other ways to show this vortex pattern off of any "magnet"

Its simplex (not simple)  Magneto-dielectric field reciprocation  (whats that mean?  Its IN THE BOOK).


Nature ,.....Nature......Nature.         "all natures lines are CURVED" 


Euclidean method,......pen and paper to the rescue!!!

Just print the SAME SHEET about 10 times, then roll 2 up into cones. etc etc.......