Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

(sic)
All that... and you still don't know how to enable your spellchecker?

Yes, I missed an M,  thanks for that wee bit of minutia that has nothing to do with anything 
You are correct, I don't spell check web chatter.

Since you cannot discuss the topic, I assume that is your fallback? 

Spellbind us with stories like Feynman told who said IAAD (instant action at a distance) was mediated by pixie dust,.......pardon,  rather he said "virtual photons"   

In all honesty son, do you really fall for the nonsense of the Cult of Quantum?

Somehow Tesla managed to squeak out a giant PILE of patents related to EM, dielectrics, and other devices without any notion of the cult of quantum and non-existent particles created ONLY to make equations balance out for Einstein's stooges.

[CANGAS]

Nice BS claim.    Have any videos or logic or proof to backup that BS?


Ohhhhhhhhh so now Im a fucking ILLUSIONIST out to mind-scr3w people?          ~~~~~~~~~~~Ahhhhhhhhhh    Another NICE  F-ing claim.

Yeah, I spent ALL those years waiting just to TRICK YOU FOLKS.      STFU loser. 

I do the work and experiments, I have both the logic, the proof AND THE RESULTS,       you have  JACK SH*T 


Magic tricks my goddamn ass boy.    I guess you think I mined SCR3WED  TinMan too?   AND his video results??

Demented  POS.



I currently have 13 diff. testing METHODS, moron.      Not "A TUBE"     Got that son???

Son, boy,   I use PLENTY OF METHODS that have NOTHING to with A: zapped magnets    OR   B: fluid suspensions.

Again, shut your hole.     You have BS claims and NOTHING MORE, go sit and spin on them.




Yes I do, youre the fucking idiot that thinks Im an "Illusionist" out to trick people........   just like Tinman and HIS VIDEOS HE DID HIMSELF

Shut your hole.

You DONT HAVE:
logic
proof
evidence
You dont have ANYTHING to back up your half-ass claims



Illusionist,  I REALLY LIKE THAT ONE.................   Demented intellectual PEDOPHILE.........I KNEW given enough time, one of you demented bastards would call me a "magician / Illusionist"

I know 100%  how  Skepticism works, how SOPHISTRY WORKS.

As a consumate expert of Platonism, translator of ancient Greek, expert on PLOTINUS, PROCLUS, DAMASCIUS, SYRIANUS, their works, and their methods, and all the various types of Skepticism, and Atomism they dealt with, I know EVERY SINGLE rancid angle you have, or WILL have , or could have.




Youre forgetting ONE IMPORTANT FACT ASSHOLE, they are not just coming down, but coming down in a CW vortex  OR a CCW vortex (depending on polarity)
That ends that horseshit.

Too bad your goddamn premise about the CRT TUBE  doesn't explain  CW on the centrifugal and CCW on the centripetal ON ONE FACE of the magnet !!!!!!!!  ROFL !!!!!!

One could postulate it as correct if it was ALL MOVING in one direction, but not BOTH inversely at the SAME TIME

So much for that rancid BS.

You flap your fucking lips,  I DO the experiments, .....and there are PLENTY MORE I have not mentioned here due to seeking potential patent rights.
You're nothing but tits on a bull, ....useless




I am very disappointed that you dont have a brain.   You are yet another skeptical LOSER in the CULT OF QUANTUM.

Actually Im not, I dont give a damn   

If I had a 10000 testing methods , youd say "ohhh, well that doesnt prove shit"



I know your type son.  Ive been debating Greek Metaphysics, and translating Prakrit for almost 15 years now, and debated the BEST MINDS alive on highly abstruse topics of nonlinear inductive reasoning and complex topics in Platonic philosophy.

That translates into:   "I can run circles around your ass in ANY debate you want".   

However LOGIC, PROOF, RESULTS, and EXPERIMENTS matter.........the rest is just you flapping your pathetic lips

You have said somewhere that Tesla had a pile of patents. I think I remember that he accumulated hundreds.

You have confessed to having 4 .

Since you represent yourself as being SMART AS THE DEVIL, I wonder why you have only 4. Any fool with $350 US can apply for a US Utility Patent. And almost any fool can write a patent for SOMETHING that almost certainly won't be rejected. And then any fool with about $1,000 US can buy the accepted patent. 

Tesla had at least 5. Or was it 6? In all the excitement I lost count myself  .


CANGAS 57

[TheoriaApophasis]

Since you represent yourself as being SMART AS THE DEVIL, I wonder why you have only 4.

Dont recall having said anything about the "devil" comment to which you refer.   

Maybe I was busy taking care of my wife slooowly dying over 10 years from a gleoblastoma brain tumor , of which she needed to be taken care of like a baby.

Course my wife was much much older than me (no, she didn't have money, I made it myself), she was a close close friend I married so her folks would not stick her in a care facility, therefore have legal rights for her to live at home rather than in a hospital (i.e. prison) slowly dying.


Prodigy yes (so-called by my professors at any rate), chess champ in high school and college.  Former Russian translator for Govt. various groups here and there.


However I owe MOST to being well (the best) studied in lost Platonic arts of methodology,   namely retroduction.



You can have the most intelligent electrical engineer on earth, that is SO smart he makes everyone else look like pond scum, but if his mental method is trash, hes not going to discover or invent anything!!!!!!!

You can read a bit about retroduction "Abduction" (problem solving / thinking methodology) in the book "Neoplatonism and Contemp. Thought".


The question then is "what the hell is the big deal"? Well its a lot. Its why Tesla got so far 'down the road'
He had the brains, the FUEL, but the high speed device was his methodological approach he inherited from Roger Boscovich and Plotinus (which Tesla did read)

Tesla said something like (paraphrasing here) ........"Poor Edison!!! All those years trying to perfect a light bulb, if he (only used my method of logic) he could have done it all in no time!!!"
Tesla , his guru Boskovich and others used a wholly lost art of retroductive thinking / approach.


useful but inferior:
Deduction:
I heard so and so say she dropped the needle over there, and bob said the needle was 4" long, so we know what to look for, wind speed indicates since it was dropped from 5 feet up, it should have fallen on THAT side of the haystack.

Induction:
Well, theres a needle in a haystack, it was last seen over there on that side, needles are heavy, so Im going to go looking over there for it

Superior in every way: (Tesla's method)
RETRODUCTION / ABDUCTION:
I know the properties of a needle, I know the properties of Hay...... watch this!
lights a match......POOOF......!! All is gone in a second in a giant flame

Theres the &@**$& needle!!!! Hay burns, metal needles dont.

Problem solved
..........(deduction and induction are still looking in the hay)


Deduction and induction are looking in a murky tub for a gold coin (wisdom, insight, invention, solution).
Retroduction says "scr3w all this nonsense" and pulls the plug and taa-daa, there's the coin.


This type of method is also called via negativa , or Apophasis. Its positing (the answer) thru RAPID negation/ elimination.

If you know the properties of ABCDEFGHIJ..........and X.........and if you are looking for X, then you literally "burn ABCDEFGHIJ into the dirt in a millisecond leaving your answer X" right in front of your feet.


All that "wonderful stuff" the writings, the architecture, the lost secrets of HOW to make things, how to discover things from "dumb people" back 5000+ years ago, (or even Tesla) has its epicenter in via negativa / apophatic / retroductive methodologies.



Tesla, IN THAT PICTURE   (below), has his ONE hand on his head pointing at his brain, and his OTHER hand on his "bible", Boskovich's work..... meaning hes 'channeling' (in a manner) this methodology of thinking to solve the problems to all his issues of his countless inventions, and fantastic stuff.

We give 100% of the credit to Tesla's Brain-Power in his creations / inventions........ really its more like 40%, the 60% IS this/that methodology.



There are some really really intelligent folks with brain power (fuel) out there,.....but their methodological approach to looking at a problem/ invention is literally driving a Yugo, or some broken down old Buick    


When I worked at Lexmark tech support long time ago, 20+ years ago, all my peers hated my guts, my problem solving "time per call of problem diagnosis" on high end complex business printers was typically 5X less than everyone else.
The managers kept monitoring my calls to wonder how the h3ll I was diagnosing 2000+ part business printers so much faster than everyone else was.
It really is that methodology.

You draw a circle around the problems, and move divergently AWAY from the problem, which is itself a CONVERGENCE to the center , the answer, thru DIvergence from the problems.

You can have DIvergent thoughts leading you from the center, the answer,...... looking for "a BILLION WAYS NOT TO MAKE A LIGHTBULB" (Sorry Edison, but you were a tinkering MORON!!!)
Great, you spend ENDLESS years eliminating the circle just to see/realize the center, which is very dumb.

Or you can realize the nature of ABCDEFG, the circle...... and have DIvergent thoughts FROM the circle (the non-answer) which is , logically necessitated to be so, CONVERGENT thoughts quickly bringing to to the center of the circle, the answer, the solution.


Divergent elimination is CONvergent synthesis (answers, solutions, discovery, invention).


Generically we think of 'divergent' as having useless thoughts going everywhere, but a different kind of divergence is used eliminatively to create a CONvergent 'mental vacuum' of comprehension into the answer of things we seek.


Edison was whacking weeds to invent........ Tesla ,mentally, was throwing gas on the BS and burning it leaving him with the answer.
This is HOW and WHY Tesla invented SO MUCH
and Edison invented , well, not so much



You CANNOT do GOOD invention  / discovery like Edison did (why the hell not? He invented a LOT) , because, for the same reasons Teslas trashed it.


its whacking weeds, creatively, its a time wasting  , a mere TINKERING.


You want a solution, you mentally throw GAS and burn everything you know its not, and you're left with what it IS.     However that really doesnt even fully describe it.


Its a methodology of pure Platonic synthesis.



People have the brains and ignore the method. He11, method is 60% or more of the battle.


All Teslas (most) photos are staged, and the MOST STAGED photo of Tesla, he has his hand on "HIS BIBLE",   >>>>>>>THEORY OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY by Roger Bosckovich<<<<.  (see pic below)

BOOK IS FREE HERE:
https://archive.org/details/theoryofnaturalp00boscrich

i.e. "Teslas Bible".........careful reading it however, it will make your brain POP



If any of you claim to grasp Tesla WITHOUT having read "his bible", you're just spitting against the wind.


The principles of field convergence / divergence, vector modalities, Platonic retroductive analysis etc etc. That space IS NOTHING, is only an attribute of a field (my next paper) are all within "Tesla's bible".


You must must must read it to grasp Tesla.

Smart people "read the master(s) work"
The smarter people are reading "the reading material OF THE master".

[CANGAS]

posts crossed on the way. my post deleted.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Why is your response post so short whereas the "quote" of your post so much longer? One more of your clever tricks?

If you read the above, you will see NO tricks.     I see you didn't even read ANY of it.      Kudos


selective vision I assume