Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

This is just another example of "We don't know everything already" so let's give some consideration to new or different ideas (like TA has):


From Science Magazine at: http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation

"Static Electricity Defies Simple Explanation

THIS is what Eric P Dollard has been screaming about for DECADES,   dielectricity, or electrostatics.       It really really is almost a 100% lost premise

BUT it forms MOST of Teslas research, and investigation by Faraday, Maxwell and Heaviside.

People think dielectrics are "insulators",  they are JUST THE OPPOSITE
http://journal.borderlands.com/1987/the-fallacy-of-conductors/



natures NATURAL "electricity" isnt electricity at all, its DIelectricity.         My amazing discoveries and other things, and uncovering the missing element of light is based IN dielectrics

The wave-particle duality  BULLSH*T is out the window in understanding dielectrics

testing of photoelectric effect is right, but its conclusions are 100% WRONG.       The E and M of   LIGHT (gamma, Xray etc etc)  is NOT responsible for the results of the photoelectric effect.
electromagnetism is merely a carrier of its radial component.

electricity is a byproduct OF Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity)...........   The 800 pound gorilla that is going to turn the world upside down with countless new inventions MUST be and WILL be in dielectrics,  not electricity.





From that article link:
If equal numbers of electrons hopped in both directions, nothing much would change. But that's where the size difference comes in. As Lowell and Truscott explained it, only one point of the sphere touches the plane, and it has just a few electrons to give and a larger number of empty states with which to absorb them. In contrast, a larger streak of the plane comes in contact with the sphere, so it has plenty of electrons to give. So more electrons hop from plane to sphere than vice versa, leaving the sphere negatively charged and the plane positively charged and creating the static. Other researchers showed how the theory could apply to grains of two different sizes.

<<<<<

THIS IS WHY THOSE MENTAL MIDGETS dont know what is going on, the entire stinking world is BRAINWASHED by Greek Atomism rehashed,


The "unicorn pixie dust discharge particle"  i.e.  the electron is  PURE CRAP, 100%

"Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the
'electron', on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the
magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated" - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric
Discharges, Waves and Impulses)

The idea of electricity as a flow of 'electrons' in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as "a psychosis". This encouraged
Heaviside to begin a series of writings

"Electrons as a separate, distinct entity...doesn't really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a 'field'." - Dr. Steve
Biller

"Here we will dispel the "electronics nerd" concept that a capacitor stores "electrons" in its plates. Taking the pair of copper plates
as in the previous experiment, but now we have two pairs of plates, one pair of plates distant from the other pair of plates. Upon one
pair of plates is imposed an electro-static potential between them. The cube of 10-C oil is inserted between this "charged" set of plates.
This hereby establishes a dielectric field of induction within the unit cube of 10-C oil. Now we then remove this cube of oil,
withdrawing it from the space bounded by the charged pair of copper plates, and taking this unit cube of oil, it is then inserted into the
space bounded by the other uncharged pair of plates. Upon insertion it is found that the un-charged pair of plates have now in fact
become charged also. It here can be seen that a cube of dielectric induction can be carried through space, from one set of plates to
another set of plates." – E. Dollard

Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end
of one unit line of dielectric induction.


"The notion exists that the electro-motive force, E.M.F. in volts, is established by "cutting" lines of magnetic induction via a socalled
electric conductor. This "cutting" is then said to impel the motions of so-called electrons within the conducting material. It is
however that a perfect conductor cannot "cut" through lines of induction, or flux lines, Phi. Heaviside points out that the perfect
conductor is a perfect obstructer and magnetic induction cannot gain entry into the so-called conducting material. So where is the
current, how then does an E.M.F. come about? Now enters the complication; it can be inferred that an electrical generator that is
wound with a perfect conducting material cannot produce an E.M.F. No lines of flux can be cut and the Ether gets wound up in a knot.
Heaviside remarks that the practitioners of his day "do a good deal of churning up the Ether in their dynamos". – E. Dollard

You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their "force lines" is the
"flow of electrons"; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance. There are no discrete
particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation,
only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called 'electrons' are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle
of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not "electrons", nor assuredly are there energy
discharges in the vacuum of space involving 'electrons'; the 'electron' is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty
mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization;
magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge;
dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q;
'electrons' do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields.

There are no electrons, negative charges, special-dimensions, warped space (resoundingly denied by Tesla and others), and no
photons; only charge, induction and radiation/discharges and their relational spins, all as mediated thru the Ether. Quantum and
Relativity is a quack religion of mathematical physics based upon the absurd premise that the universe is a giant sea of interactive
massless tiny invisible beads and that space itself, nothing, mediates interactions and can be genuinely 'warped'. Such conceptual
Atomistic reifications as amplified by GR (Relativity) cannot be enjoined, and the only genuine warping occurring is not out in the
cosmos of space, but in the empty spaces between the ears of those who reify such absurdities; warped minds rationally would invent
warped space; its purely logical in its insanity that the former produce the later.

Space has only one dimension, space, which is a metrical dimension. The use of cubic notation is habit-based, any number of coordinates
in any number of geometries can serve to define the boundaries of space. Nature is not governed by the irrational
pontifications of GR and QM, rather it is governed by mutually interactive reciprocal conjugates of charges-discharges, centripetalcentrifugal
movements, both spatial and counterspatial. Instantaneous action at a distance, and fields are all Ether modality mediations
as propagated by counterspace-in-disturbance, the Ether, its pressure gradients and perturbations. No other mediator can be logically
hypothesized, much less theorized. The very same Ether of Tesla, Heaviside, C.P. Steinmetz, and even originally from Einstein before
logic fled his mind completely, was correct and remains so. Tesla outright denied our current definition of the electron as a 'discharge
particle'.

All electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force (as reified by the incorrect
understanding of the definition of a 'field'), these pressure gradients, or "lines" are contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving
motion to the terminus 'electron'. The thermionic 'electron' contracts, pulling the 'electron', the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the
'electron'. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, in both cases these socalled
'electrons' assume radial motions, with non participating pressure gradients, or forces filling the 'voids', directing the
'electrons'. Hence, it is the so-called 'electrons' (dielectric radial discharges) that travel in straight lines, that is, radially. 'Electrons'
have nothing to do with the flow of electricity; the so-called 'electrons' are the rate at which electricity is destroyed. 'Electrons' are in
fact the resistance. From extensive experimental work into atomic electrical science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla, it is
established that the so-called electron is only a shadow; its apparent-only physical mass is merely an electrical momentum (ejected by
the dielectric inertia in disturbance). There is no rest mass to an electron nor could there be logically, a rest-electron 'bead'; such
notions are absurd and evidence proven non-existent. The very premise is logically impossible and contradicts the rational physics of
atomic charges and discharges

[TinselKoala]

This is just another example of "We don't know everything already" so let's give some consideration to new or different ideas (like TA has):


From Science Magazine at: http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation

"Static Electricity Defies Simple Explanation

If you've ever wiggled a balloon against your hair, you know that rubbing together two different materials can generate static electricity. But rubbing bits of the same material can create static, too. Now, researchers have shot down a decades-old idea of how that same-stuff static comes about.

The same-material phenomenon produces important real-world effects, such as generating lightening in volcanic eruptions, gumming up the processing of powders in manufacturing, and causing explosions in grain elevators. Physicists thought they understood what was going on, but suddenly "the dominant theory appears to be dead," says Troy Shinbrot, an applied physicist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, in New Jersey who was not involved in the new work."
Article continues at the link above but I think that says enough to validate that we "don't already know everything".   The more I know the more I know how little we know.   

Read that article carefully and read the post immediately above this one. They cannot both be right. But they can most certainly both be wrong. Note that the Tattooed Genius is claiming that the science that has constructed the technology that completely surrounds us and enables our very lives is wrong and that the entities, like electrons, that it manipulates so facilely and productively don't even exist. And he's posting from a computer!

[TinselKoala]

480nm?  Blue??

Magenta is the new blue, didn't you know? Or maybe you need your white balance adjusted. Or maybe the CCDs in his mighty 3-chip video camera are all confused because the entities they are made to deal with... don't exist.

[TheoriaApophasis]

But they can most certainly both be wrong. Note that the Tattooed Genius is claiming that the science that has constructed the technology that completely surrounds us and enables our very lives is wrong and that the entities,

I said no such thing, you proven liar of vile filth.
Getting ACCURATE results, and getting 100% wrong conclusions is sciences (so-called) biggest fuck up.

I used to repair computers, dont even think of giving me a heads up on a computer, boy.
The TECH that surrounds you and me are  ELECTRICAL, ...............the REAL COMPUTER, idiot, is your brain and nervous system which are DIELECTRICAL
same as lightning.


So, you, pathetically, in DEMONIC IGNORANCE, are denying dielectrics using your brain that WORKS off electrostatic charge/discharge  (i.e. dielectricity).
Since you are WHOLLY UNREAD on electrical theory, let me give your a HEADS up on HOW MUCH dielectricity plays a part in MOST of Teslas works, MUCH of Heaviside, and Maxwells writings.

Tesla created the AC electrical generator,  but MOST of Tesla's focus, as he himself ADMITS was in electrostatics, ie DIELECTRICITY.

You son, are a "fools fool"


mass/gravity  and electricity are BOTH byproducts of the interplay etc. between natures 2 Principles, Dielectricity and Magnetism.


The Ether is the Ether is the Ether,     Ive already proven in the video the simple modality extrapolation to get ALL 4 Field modalities.


>>>>>>>Electrostatics are "natures" electrical modality of operation, BOY <<<<<<<<<<
FACT:   Electricity is the PRODUCT OF    PHI (magnetism) and  PSI (dielectricity)   = Q (electrification in Planck).

That means,  BOY,  that Electricity is a WHOLLY DIFF. creature than DIELECTRICITY.


>>>>>And as I proved about 8 pages ago, proved you BOTH a stinking LIAR, and very VILE DISGUSTING PERSON. <<<<<<






Boy, because of MY understanding of **~*~*~*~*~DIELECTRICITY*~*~*~*~*~*..................I'm the first person ever to deliver to the world the ACCURATE model of WHAT a magnet is, HOW it works, and WHY it works

Whats more, I get RESULTS, .........  Tinman did same in less than 72 HOURS,..........NOW his brain is spinning with IDEAS like his magnet, that will hopefully make him a fortune in invention.

completely surrounds us and enables our very lives

Proven liar and proven spreader of filth..........YOUR VERY LIFE i.e. your body runs off dielectricity.

what you USE in your daily life, runs off electricity.

If you dont know this simple fact, then you know LESS THAN NOTHING

[TheoriaApophasis]

480nm?  Blue??

Those were snaps off the video of single channel 635 nm,    yes yes, my err.    I havent slept in nearly 4 days.


Par-don.