Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: d3x0r on July 28, 2014, 05:07:04 PM
sounds like a version of CMR magnets... correlated magnetics research uhmm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65XwNwgyWO4
http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com/



What that scumbag company and their novel geometric single-unit polarizer DOES
, which they dont tell you, is that due to tight multipolar induction, their "novel magnets" dont hold that magneto-dielectric geometry for very long


Haaaaa

d3x0r

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on July 28, 2014, 05:22:19 PM


What that scumbag company and their novel geometric single-unit polarizer DOES
, which they dont tell you, is that due to tight multipolar induction, their "novel magnets" dont hold that magneto-dielectric geometry for very long


Haaaaa
I'd beleive that.  but the iron also won't always conduct the repulsion... if it's left long enough attracted, it'll remain attracting.


Bits of wisdom one can receive from Theo:
So a force that moves to bodies toward one another isn't attraction, and a force that tends to accelerate them away from each other isn't repulsion(repulsive). 

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: d3x0r on July 28, 2014, 05:28:19 PM
Bits of wisdom one can receive from Theo:
So a force that moves to bodies toward one another isn't attraction, and a force that tends to accelerate them away from each other isn't repulsion.


LONG AGO they used to claim the Loadstone was "breathing" with the "breath of the gods"


to incorrectly call the jumping of iron to a "magnet" as  "MAGNETIC attraction" IS NO different than people long ago calling it the "force of the gods"


Descriptions are EASY,   EXPLAINATIONS are where wisdom and insight come into play.


What you (and everyone else) incorrectly call ATTRACTION, is dielectric voidance , as necessitated by the properties of dielectricity.


Connotative
attraction and repulsion ARE correct.

However they are NOT doing so due to magnetism in the "magnet" which is a dielectric (dominant and/or coherent) object, ......radiation/discharge doesnt attract anything.   It displaces things, but not attract them


In magnetized iron created from mere magnetic induction, there is dielectric coherence only.

in a strong magnet created from discharge coils, there is enormous dielectric capacitance AND coherency.




The very phrase  "magnetic attraction" (a rancid LIE) is sooooo deeply ingrained in peoples minds,  to say and prove otherwise,... its like yelling  "God doesnt exist" in the middle of the Vatican.     

Its PURELY FUTILE

MileHigh

D3x:

Here is were you will get a Bloch wall:

[N----S] [iron bar] [S---N]

There will be a Bloch wall somewhere in the middle of the iron bar.  That's what a Bloch wall is - a boundary between magnetic domains of opposite (or different) alignment.

You can't forget what the definition of a Bloch wall is.

Here there will be no Bloch wall at all:

[N----S] [iron bar] [N---S]

Remove the iron bar and there will be no Bloch wall:

[N----S] [N---S]

And that looks identical to this, where there is still no Bloch wall:

[N---S]

What you are talking about, the "equilibrium point" is more about where the 'theoretical' lowest state of magnetic potential energy (MPE) is for a magnet.  That's at the center line of the magnet.  If you had a "magic iron ball" that could travel through the solid magnet, then it would travel to the center of the magnet and stop at that point because it is the position with the lowest magnetic potential energy.

So it's a case of mixing or making up definitions.  A Bloch wall is the border between two magnetic domains or macro magnetic domains with different orientations.  That does not exist at the center of a standard bar magnet.

A Bloch wall has only one definition.  Talking about an "equilibrium point" in the center of a magnet where the lowest MPE has absolutely nothing to do with a Bloch wall.

And I know where the misinformation comes from.  It's from the Bedini followers.  Bedini falsely says that there is a Bloch wall at the center of a magnet and that a magnet has "a north half" and "a south half."  Both statements are completely wrong and they corrupt the minds of his followers.  Likewise, he talked about the (sold for scrap) "Windmill motor" having a different setup depending on whether it was in the Northern Hemisphere or in the Southern Hemisphere because of the Earth's magnetic field.  The silliness of that statement is typical of the "false world" set up by Bedini.  The magnetic field in either hemisphere is exactly the same from the perspective of an observer on the ground.

Repeat:  There is no bloody Bloch wall in the center of a bar magnet, nor some "dielectric inertial plane."  A bar magnet is essentially a single macro magnetic domain were no matter where you are inside the magnet, all that you see when you look in any direction are magnetic dipoles pointed in the same direction.  You could be anywhere inside the magnet and look in any direction and you see the exact same thing.

And there is no "north field" and "south field."  That's just a naming convention.  Magnetic field lines travel in circles and as a result you have no frame of reference to say "north" and "south."  However, the magnetic field is a vector quantity that has a distinguishable direction, and that is highly significant.

MileHigh

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 06:18:26 PM
There will be a Bloch wall somewhere in the middle of the iron bar.  That's what a Bloch wall is - a boundary between magnetic domains of opposite (or different) alignment.


HAAAAAAAA!!!!   I see you dont know the diff. between a DESCRIPTION and an EXPLANATION!!!!!!!!!     PATHETIC !!!!    ;D

Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 06:18:26 PM
Repeat:  There is no bloody Bloch wall in the center of a bar magnet, nor some "dielectric inertial plane."

Sorry, thats a CLAIM,   I see no evidences,  pedal that BS down the road, son.



Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 06:18:26 PM
Magnetic field lines travel in circles and as a result you have no frame of reference to say "north" and "south."  However, the magnetic field is a vector quantity that has a distinguishable direction, and that is highly significant.


Nope son, its called GYROMAGNETIC PRECESSION,
  also known as the Larmor Frequency.   You know NOTHING.


Even a MRI technician knows about this




Hmm, I see the dielectric inertial plane ("bloch wall") pictured below,.........Yeah, youre full of it.



Thats also why some physics books call it "MAGNETIC PINCH"     idiot.     (pics below)