Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

According to convention, and as surmised long before these imaging capabilities were available, the domains are regions of similar alignment, with "buffering" regions (if you will) of lesser aligned regions in between.  Also according to convention, each domain contains a large number of atomic or molecular structures each having a magnetic moment similarly aligned within a given domain.

When imaging the domains, we see the result of those atomic/molecular alignments reflected as the more macroscopic structures, i.e., domains.

Is this somewhat a question of semantics, that is, do you have a preference for some other word that describes what it is we see and what is referred to as a domain?

PW

the very term domain means nothing, the mitigating factor of observed differences of perfect alignment is due to:

1. crystalline boundaries which interfere with capacitance/ polarization

2. impurities

and a few other factors.



"magnetic moment" is also meaningless, what aligns the double hyperbola of polarization is dielectricity


Yours and others analogies (all incorrect) is like saying the SPINDLE of a gyroscope (magnetism)  "Aligns the flywheel"  (electrical inertia i.e.  DIELECTRIC INERTIA).......

its just the bloody opposite.



The so-called magnetic moment (quantum bullshit) is gyromagnetic precession from the binding system within which there is both the conjugate field of magneto-dielectricity and AS NECESSITATED by definition of the discharging radiation of magnetism, nucleal precession


also called the Larmor frequency.

[Acca]

 New Forms of Ferroic Order
Ferrotoroidicity   

http://www.hikari.uni-bonn.de/research/multiferroics/new-forms-of-ferroic-order

Fig. 2:[/font] Ferrotoroidicity as spontaneous alignment of magnetic vortices. An example for a left-handed and a right-handed vortex yielding a toroidal moment out of and into the plane respectively, is shown in (a). A corresponding ferrotoroidic domain structure is shown in (b).[/font]

[gravityblock]

We could generate a small radial current and a large normal or circular current or vice versa, with two independent circuits.  There is no parallel for this in classical mechanics.

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

New Forms of Ferroic Order
Ferrotoroidicity   

http://www.hikari.uni-bonn.de/research/multiferroics/new-forms-of-ferroic-order

That shit link is riddled with flaws,  such as :


" It is obtained by replacing the spins of the ferrotoroidic order by electric dipoles. "


Dielectricity HAS , definitionally no dipoles, only magnetic discharge polarization (=dipole).


Typical mental-midget "educated moron" level science



Like most other idiots, that site is blaming flies on horseshit rather than the HORSE.     Same attribute reification fallacy. 


Ive already prove the math that the "vortex" is just expanding and contracting interlacing UNIFORM SPHERES of divergent radiation and convergent dielectric voidance.



Nice link, too bad its more academic bullshit that sticks with the status quo of thinking magnetism is driving magnetism!~!!~~~!!!!!       Goddamn unfiltered fucking insanity.

[TheoriaApophasis]

We could generate a small radial current and a large normal or circular current or vice versa, with two independent circuits.  There is no parallel for this in classical mechanics.

Gravock

So, theyre discovering longitudinal dielectrics like Tesla did long ago.



Good to see humanity is discovering what Tesla was already doing and understood.......