Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

So if you want to share some more, perhaps it can all be explained.

Explain what?  Shit , you KNOW IT ALL,   so explain it for us.



There is no TRICK here, NO GLUE, NO TAPE,     anyone can replicate this in 10 seconds.  I HATE TRICKS, and I dont pull them on anyone.



and by the way, you can replace the 2x2x1"  neo with even a SMALL 1/4"  CUBE and do the same thing.

[Cap-Z-ro]

havent heard of that one, how does it go?

This old guy who thought I "had a lot on the ball" as a young man, used to say that.

He merely substituted the 'bull' for a rain barrel...which I thought was a more creative form of the analogy.

Regards...

[MileHigh]

Yes I think I figured out the the thin ring also.  The thin ring is also being tugged on both sides by the north and south sides of the big magnet.  So that tugging keeps it at right angles to the flat faces.  The net force on the ring is towards the surface the ring is on.  It's another magnetic "down" force.

Then I realized that if the ring were to roll towards either edge, that would make it move further away from the center of the magnet.  So the ring is held at right angles by the tugging, and is sitting in a tiny magnetic potential well.  As long as the contact point between the ring and surface of the magnet does not slip, the ring is held in place.

So that's the explanation for the "Lagrange point," in this case.  The ring is sitting in a precarious GPE well.

My confidence is fair to good, so I am not 100% certain that I got it.

MileHigh

[gravityblock]

I know, .......I was making an ASIDE comment on "electromagnetism" in general




You said>>>>>Apparently, the charge also has a dual, inert and gravitational nature.



yes, thats because Dielectricity terminates into the creation of MASS/MATTER in galactic formations. 



Dielectricity is TIED to gravity the same way electricity and magnetism are tied  (so to speak)

The electromagnetic torque of an apparently continuous current in a conducting spiral makes the double, gravitational and inert nature of the electromagnetic mass clearly apparent.  The gravitational nature of mechanical mass is weak as compared to its inertia, which makes it impossible to produce a significant and quick change in the gravitational field.  On the other hand, the charge's inertia being small and gravity being strong allows us to change the proportion very quickly, generating very intense fields.

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yes I think I figured out the the thin ring also.  The thin ring is also being tugged on both sides by the north and south sides of the big magnet.  So that tugging keeps it at right angles to the flat faces.  The net force on the ring is towards the surface the ring is on.  It's another magnetic "down" force.

"tugged"  Hmmmmm yeah, scientific there.

"sides" ?  CW and CCW are a proven illusion of polarization.........so, now, tell me why you cannot twist the STEEL ring PARALLEL (AT ALL) , which is how the disk magnet naturally "sits"

and JUST THE INVERSE for the disk magnet.


"magnetism attracts shit"   RIGHT? 

Then I realized that if the ring were to roll towards either edge, that would make it move further away from the center of the magnet.  So the ring is held at right angles by the tugging, and is sitting in a tiny magnetic potential well.  As long as the contact point between the ring and surface of the magnet does not slip, the ring is held in place.

so, now, tell me why you cannot twist the STEEL ring PARALLEL (AT ALL)

My confidence is fair to good, so I am not 100% certain that I got it.
MileHigh

Most wise thing I have ever heard you say





You said last page it was because of the "powerful big magnet"


well, as you can see below, that isnt the case


this is a 5/8" NEO sitting on top of a LUCITE ROD