Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[wattsup]

@all

I don't know man. People use their brains to rationalize the world around them and this whole thread is just that. You see only what we want to see and disregard the rest. hehehehehe

So all of you just chew every morsel and enjoy all this free theorizing.

The video as indicated by Gustave Le-Bonn is exactly that. It is not showing anything unexpected since the damn magnet is just spinning at the same rate that is required to follow its linear path on a curved surface. His lame brained amazement is very troubling, indeed. Just like every video so far produced by @TA, every single one is normal effect described by faulty premises. But you know all this lying, patching and feeble mindedness started with Faraday and his Cabalian cohorts. People who cannot critically think on their own will chew this up. hehehehe

Just more junk being layered on the already extensive junk pile and again will get 0% closer to OU. hahahaha

I am now convinced that the Grand Cabal has one measure of how safe they are and that is - As long as man winds coils and sees magnets as field producing devices, no one will ever arrive at anything close to OU. That's because the answer is in a totally different direction that even Tesla did not consider (yes - imagine that) because he himself was taken in by most of the foolery even though his instincts and natural intellect did push him to speak out at times, he did now know then what is known now, so Mr. Cabal, sleep well indeed because humanity is way off the mark.

Or is it? We will know soon enough and at least OUers will have a real new method to look and work at their experiments. At least some scientists will have new ways to derive their measurements. At least some chemists will have new ways of taming the atomic spin. Unlike anything shown by @TA that will only lead to rehashing dead ends. hahahahahahahaha

Meanwhile, Mr. @TA, the stage is yours for what I am expecting will be more magic tricks with grand explanations but no substance. I guess science fiction really does draw in the crowds.

Oh, and for anyone who likes to call me a TROLL, they are right. I am a troll against stupidity, ignorance, feeble minded followers of Bozo Science and Dreamism, troll against non-OU deriving orientations and troll against distractions that pull away OUers from the main reasons of this Forum. I have a good level of past experience on this forum that proves that 1000%, so F off. Those who do call me a Troll however have what to show? Only that when you cannot use your own logic to look deep enough into an effect to work out the world around you, anyone who sounds quasi-convincing and totally wacky brained must know better then you, right. So enjoy the ride, but at least @wattsup will have said it here since the beginning, @TA is a bad dream, and in another 1000 pages some of you will know it for yourself. I can't do any more then that. hahahahahaha

Last point is very simple. Every single effect shown so far by Mr. @TuffAss can be simply explained without diving into his cesspool of Grand Fieldery. I had already started but Mr. @TuffAss just likes to throw temper tantrums instead of countering anything with anything of value. @Tinman does a small laser test and what does @TuffAss say, "Oh, you need to find the right angle". Well there are over 2 billion angles possible so good luck with that one, meanwhile he will say, "see, @Tinmans experiment was just done wrong and this proves my theory is true". hahahahahaha

The real deal is this. You cannot expand on the mountain of knowledge already in place without adding a new extension at the base from which you can then work upwards to the top again. While you do that, some parts of the original mountain may fall just as some parts of the new build-up may fall as is normal in nature. @TA is giving no base, only throwing rocks onto the mountain and each one will just tumble down again and create a very rocky plain of nothingness. No where to grow, no were to rise, no where to climb the mountain and see the complete view. If you ask me, that is the real definition of a Troll. What a joke, bad one, but joke all the same.

My offer is now off the table.

wattsup

[TheoriaApophasis]

Just like every video so far produced by @TA, every single one is normal effect described by faulty premises. But you know all this lying, patching and feeble mindedness started with Faraday and his Cabalian cohorts. People who cannot critically think on their own will chew this up. hehehehe
wattsup

Claims are for children, I back mine up with experiment after experiment, logic, and it MUST prove all observed phenomena.


MINE DOES.   




As for OTHER PEOPLES VIDEOS...........I have no control over THAT.

[SeaMonkey]

Wattsup,

Your lack of technical expertise is showing...

Too much defense and not enough thought.

[MileHigh]

Gustave Le-Bonn takes a lens and two magnets and sees the magnet on top spinning and is convinced this is a real phenomenon having to do with the alleged vortex associated with a magnetic field.  Gustave is the same guy that made a bunch of aquarium videos with current flow and saw the various vortex forms.  The bubbles swirled around dependent on the setup and the direction of current flow, etc.  Gustave proved that he is clueless with his aquarium videos and he even mentions them in the new clip.

This business of the spinning magnet on a convex surface was already explained earlier in this thread.  It has very little to do with magnetic fields.  The only thing the magnetic field does is impart a force of attraction on the spinning magnet.  If you passed Grade 8 physics then you should be able to figure out why the magnet spins.  If you can't understand why the magnet spins then it's like there is a huge area of your cognitive thought process that is incapable of doing simple visualizations and solving simple physics problems.  It doesn't necessarily mean that you are stupid, it just means that you can't visualize or understand these kinds of things.  It's like a lay person looking at a flat screen TV and if you ask them about the "guts" they have no clue.

Where you cross the gap into stupidity is when you blindly believe someone else's explanation when you don't understand the real explanation or the fake explanation.  You decide to hitch a ride on the fake explanation (like Gustave) without the faintest understanding one way or the other.  You can sense this big [  b  l  a  n  k  ] in some people's cognitive processes.

A tempest in a teapot over a bloody magnet spinning on a convex piece of glass.  Physics is being "rewritten."

The whole thing has a feeling like the crazy absurdities and juxtapositions you see in the movie Dr. Strangelove.

The broken ring magnet that magically comes together with the two pieces in opposite orientations is another example.  Give you guys a Rubik's Cube and some of you would probably have mental orgasms.

MileHigh

[d3x0r]

Re spinning magnet on a convex surface...
if the inner magnet was on a more concave surface, then the rotation would be reversed (compared to previous demos, cw motion of drive magnet will cause cw rotation).
if the curve was exactly the same then it would slide, other than when the driving magnet becomes skewed from the center... then if it's more towards the center, then the rotation will be reversed (drive cw, rotation cw), if it's towards the outside, the rotation will be as has been demonstrated on a convex lens so far (drive cw, rotation ccw)


IF the experiment was done on 2 plates of glass there would be no rotation... so there must be something about the interaction of the curve that allows it...
-----
Why is cereal magnetic?