Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

I will go so far as to say that as soon as something 'appears' to be anything it is not essentialy what it looks like.heisenberg mr apophasis.heisenberg.if a photon is relativistic..if a PHOTON is RELATIVISTIC..theneverything in 'existence' must be relativistic too.this is logic(human perspective logic anyways).you want to step outside relativism and tell us 'no its really this simplicity here',,how are you going to do this mr apophasis when you yourself are trapped in it

[TheoriaApophasis]

Apophasis:'Space is nothing, neither FORCE nor FIELD, NOR can MANIFEST ANYTHING of its own accord.'

Crap man.where did the universe originate from then huh? Empty Space is not what it appears to be.it is relativistic.so is matter.they fold on each other

space and nothing are the same thing.

space is a qualifier of SOMETHING ELSE , typically 2 or more, as a measure ONLY,   it has NO PROPERTIES OR ATTRIBUTES

1 Monas

1 point, aoristos dyad

2 line

3 circle

5 sphere



4, or space, doesnt exist in the Fibonacci sequence, likewise.

[TheoriaApophasis]

if a PHOTON is RELATIVISTIC.

there is no such BS as a photon


The trifold circuit of light, or "EM" is transverse E and M and a longitudinal inertial perturbation

"relativistic" is only a mind screw to state that all 3 are codependent , and none exists independent of the others .

relativistic "effects" are just a mentally inferior BS pseudo-science to explain (but dont) FIELD MECHANICS

[profitis]

Apophasis:'"relativistic" is only a mind screw'

Damn right it is.because it IS right? For example: a homo sapien can only possibly perceive suchnsuch.a honeybee can only perceive suchnsuch.you would literaly have to step outside of your own perception to see truth not so? You would have to 'become' existence to see existence.in other words you would have to die and be alive at the sametime not so? Die to break away from human perception,remain alive to record it and write down what you see not so? I'm deviating into subjective consciousness territory here and its limitations.so where exactly do you differ from the quantum mechanics mr apophasis.your theory is more localised it seems as to the nature of a photon-matter ITSELF right? In other words you're not really stepping outside of relativism but attacking models within the greater relativistic model correct?we need some perspective sir

[joel321]

profitis, do you believe that there is nothing else to yet be learned?