Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Acca]

 Joel here is the best representation of Ken in his "self home made" hemp robe ...

Link to that video...of his ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLMl5PqgQ48

Look.... I like Ken,  now that does NOT mean that "I agree with his philosophy.." as such example :

Like his swearing and  calling people "trigger words"  ...beign rude and crude... His Hate of people who dis-agree with him...

I will tolerate his Magnetism Theory as it is HIS belief .. and to convince me that it is correct is also "faith" in "my" understanding and for NOT EVERYONE ELSE...

"U" Have to discover that for your "self"...

and if you hate what he does or what he is, "he is what he is" and that will not change him.. or my belief in him or his magnetic theory..

I also like ugly dogs.. so what !!! It's my choice not yours ...

You Have to accept the fact that calling him WRONG and filthy names just also wrong ..


Accept all of him as a "human" with all the character faults that he carries...because one just can't cut out the bad part and leave just the good parts.. as that will make him cease to exist... as in Hinduism all LIFE is sacred, ever the slimy brown rat...


The Laughing Budda is a popular representation of fortune, pleasure, innocence, and complete joy which is already obvious on his cheerful face. Many people know that by rubbing his belly which is full of fortune, it can bring in good luck and success in your home. The larger the tummy of the Buddha, the more it becomes more favorable to the people. That is why the Laughing Buddha is truly one of the most dearly loved Buddha icons which can be seen in almost all Chinese homes and eating places all over the planet.

Moreover, the Laughing Buddha can also be called a Buddha of Wealth because it depicts holding wealth like vessels full of gold, tons of ingots, and sacks full of treasures. It also carries a wu lou or gourd which is a sign of healthiness and endurance in life. This article can teach you how to use the Laughing Buddha to achieve a better lifestyle.

Acca..

[/font] Link to the Buddha...below

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/Budai.jpg


http://www.iai-international.org/feng-shui-laughing-buddha.html

[CycleGuy]

QVZPE has meaning only in the current thinking paradigm, in which quantum=small, vacuum=empty space, zero=nothing, point=particle, energy=movement, or with other words SEsNPM, ie at smallest levels of an empty space there is some energy from particles. But if we assume there is no "resting mass" which is the truth of this sentence?

Well, therein lies your fundamental conceptual error, doesn't it?

Quantum != "small". Quantum means "quantized". In other words, the energy states of the universe are discrete, originally discovered due to distinct spectral emission lines of different elements, which is caused by electron orbitals being quantized, which is caused by an electron orbital requiring an integer number of De Broglie waves in its orbit, or the electron will have set up a destructive interference orbit that will cause an unstable orbit. Thus the electron, in dropping in its orbital, gives off only certain wavelength photons. Do you deny spectral emission lines? If not, how do you explain them in your universe? How do you explain the shift in spectral emission lines in a reduced QVZPE field density environment? What prevents the electron from "crashing into" the protons of the nucleus in your universe, because in the real world, it's the ground state energy level imparted by the QVZPE field that prevents this, thereby underpinning the stability of all matter.

Vacuum != "empty space". The vacuum is, quite literally, the Quantum Vacuum Zero Point Energy field, the fabric of space-time. Without it, space could not exist, matter could not exist. The QVZPE field radiation pressure (which is always increasing due to mass in stars being reverted to energy), in trying to reach its highest entropy state, has only two options... either expand space or concretize mass. As I proved mathematically, for mass to be created, entropy must increase, and it's common sense that when space increases for the same unit measure of energy in that space, entropy increases. It is more energetically conservative right now for the universe to expand to relieve QVZPE field radiation pressure. At some point in the past, it was more energetically conservative to concretize mass, which accounts for the mass we have today.

You can think of the QVZPE field as an extension of the stars themselves... the stars are a hot plasma, very low in entropy, the QVZPE field is a cold plasma, higher in entropy... the energy being converted from mass in those stars flows out into space, increasing the area it covers as it flows outward from the star. Thus, it cools and increases in entropy, becoming part of the QVZPE field.

Or do you also deny that stars give off energy converted from mass? Because that'd be a bit nonsensical, don't you think? Now, where would that energy from stars go, and by what means is it being mediated in your universe?

Mass is an extension of the QVZPE field in that mass is an even higher-entropy form of energy... when the force of gravity overcomes the molecular repulsion inherent in the matter in stars, the resulting fusion lowers entropy, converting some of that mass back into energy, while at the same time transmuting that mass into higher-entropy forms (ie: heavier elements).

But you'll note it's a balancing act... too much mass in one place and you get a black hole, nothing can escape despite atoms fusing, and thus entropy continues increasing... but take that gravity away from the black hole and entropy would suddenly decrease catastrophically, forming the most energetically conservative (highest entropy) forms of energy it can... which would likely be matter.

That's why heavier elements are formed in an exploding supernova, after all... the sudden gravitational collapse isn't enough to cause a black hole, the rebound overpowers gravity, throwing that low-entropy star matter out. Since everything in the universe seeks the quickest and easiest path to highest entropy, some of that already-existing matter is transmuted to heavier elements, and some of the  energy in the exploding supernova is converted to lighter elements.

One could say gravity is an effect brought about by the universe's seeking balance... since everything tends toward higher entropy, something must balance that... gravity does so. In the case of planets, since the gravity is insufficient to cause fusion, apparently an agglomeration of molecules is lower-entropy (ie: they occupy a smaller space) than those same molecules being spread over a large amount of space. Enough of the molecules put together, though, and gravity can really get to work, fusing the elements to give off energy (which has lower entropy)... but it still tends toward higher entropy... that energy is thrown outward to spread throughout space (and thereby raise its entropy), and the matter forms heavier (ie: higher entropy) forms of matter via transmutation... gravity, the universe's most frustrated force, always striving, never achieving. 

When one denies the existence of the QVZPE field, one denies the great majority of all of the universe. When one denies that fields exist, one denies the very underpinnings of what makes our universe work the way it does.

[sadang]

CycleGuy, I'm not here to convince you about my words, vision and understanding, nor I have all the answers in the world, I'm here only to express my opinion which rise some questions for some.

There is not any real word, other than that defined by human mind. Can you comprehend and accept this? In an atom in which 99,99 x 10^12 of its volume is empty space, how can you define the matter, particle, mass and the momentum? And what define the real world in this emptiness? The existence and interaction of fields maybe? And fields are what beyond the abstract concept and their math expression? 

When one denies the existence of QVZPE field, one denies only the current concepts and interpretations of what makes our Universe work the way it work, not how it works in its intimate and its entirety. And he try to put it on other bricks, which should be based on principles not laws, ie valid from micro to macro levels of Universe. At least what we define micro and macro related to current limited understanding.

"Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality." – W. Russell

[minnie]

   I presume a magnet works perfectly fine in a vacuum, therefore
  even if you think there's nothing there,there certainly is!
           John.

[CycleGuy]

CycleGuy, I'm not here to convince you about my words, vision and understanding, nor I have all the answers in the world, I'm here only to express my opinion which rise some questions for some.

There is not any real word, other than that defined by human mind. Can you comprehend and accept this? In an atom in which 99,99 x 10^12 of its volume is empty space, how can you define the matter, particle, mass and the momentum? And what define the real world in this emptiness? The existence and interaction of fields maybe? And fields are what beyond the abstract concept and their math expression? 

The universe neither knows nor cares what your "opinion" of it is. It is reality and it will remain reality no matter how far off the rails your thinking goes. Reality will not bend to your will no matter what. Reconcile yourself to this fact, and the fact that QM has been verified to be accurate to better than one part in one million (and it improves every day), or continue to deny reality. The only one you're really hurting in your denial of reality and in your embracing the utter insanity that is Wheelerism (an amateurish and unattributed rip-off hodgepodge of Russellian theory, Circlon theory, Dollard theory and a few other off the wall rantings, mixed in with several serious fundamental errors in critical thinking) is yourself.

But if you continue to insist on golfing off the green, I'll be forced to drop you into the Bozo Bin. My job isn't to correct your fundamental misconceptions about reality, as an adult you should be capable of doing that yourself. My job is to learn as much as I can about reality, collaborate with those who are doing the same, and figure out some way of using that knowledge to benefit mankind. You can either join in, or you can go sit down on the second string bench, twiddle your thumbs and think your silly unworkable-universe thoughts.

When one denies the existence of QVZPE field, one denies only the current concepts and interpretations of what makes our Universe work the way it work, not how it works in its intimate and its entirety. And he try to put it on other bricks, which should be based on principles not laws, ie valid from micro to macro levels of Universe. At least what we define micro and macro related to current limited understanding.

"Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality." – W. Russell

Walter Russell, the man who thought the spiral arms of a galaxy were radiation spiraling outward, instead of matter spiraling inward?

Walter Russell, whose formal education ended at the 4^th grade?

Walter Russell, who wrote: "Electricity is the strain or tension set up by the two opposing desires of universal Mind thinking", whatever that babble means?

Walter Russell, who posited that all planetary orbits become eccentric with time, whereas modern science knows planetary orbits start out eccentric due to excessive speed, and as the planet scrubs off speed due to gravitational drag, the orbit becomes more circular?

Walter Russell, who said the Earth was thrown off from the sun, and that the planet was continually flattening at the poles and would thus become unstable in its orbit about the sun?

Walter Russell, who said that light does not travel, that it "reproduces" itself, and that the speed of light is dependent upon the frequency and the length of the waves of that light?

Walter Russell, who said that light is both a "corpuscle" and a wave?

Walter Russell, who said the electron wasn't a "negative particle", it was an ever-expanding "corpuscle", and therefore it was perpetually moving outward toward space? He states exactly what Mr. Wheeler ripped off from Russellian theory without even bothering to attribute, to wit:

There is no such condition in nature as negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.

Compressing bodies are charging into higher potential conditions. Conversely, expanding bodies are discharging into lower potential conditions. To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting body.

Walter Russell, who blathered on about a "mother-light" and a "father-light"?

Walter Russell, who said that light rays "multiply their volume" in space after they leave a star, meaning they quite literally get bigger?

Walter Russell, who said light is "conditioned" from its creation to become a certain thing, specifically stating sodium and the seed of an oak tree?

Walter Russell, who said that the sun wasn't throwing off photons of light, but was somehow reproducing itself here on Earth "by extending the reproductions out through cold space into ever enlarging wave fields until those reproductions begin to converge again toward our center of gravity into ever smaller wave fields."? So light can grow and shrink in volume, according to Russell, all without it affecting the frequency of that light, apparently.

Yeah, quoting Walter Russell isn't going to bolster your argument. He's the original Wheeler. He happened upon a couple of discoveries, then went off into the deep dark woods of whackjobbery.