Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

sadang

CycleGuy, you still keep paying exaggerate attention to minor aspects of what I write, and completely avoid the important aspects. I consider Universe care about my opinion as well as of your opinion, because we both shape it! The Universe is not something external to you and me and everything compose and define it. And Universe is reality in the same manner as I wrote above. Or as I wrote in a previous message, thinking that Universe obey the human laws as we define it from here on Earth, is a huge mistake and a big lack of wisdom!

So, keep believing the Universe is defined by QVZPE if this is your way, and continue on Descartes method of knowledge. And will shape a reality accordingly! But, from time to time rethink what are the meaning of such concepts as matter, particles, mass, momentum, field and static.

"As I revolve in my mind the thoughts in answer to your question I find the most wonderful thing is the utter aberration of the scientific mind during the last twenty-five years. In that time the relativity theory, the electron theory, the quantum theory, the theory of radioactivity and others have been worked out and developed to an amazing degree. And yet probably not less than 90 per cent of what is thought today to be demonstrable scientific truth is nothing but unrealizable dreams." - Nikola Tesla - Galveston Daily News, Galveston, Texas, March 13, 1932, Page 11

"Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract (unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense." - Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum (from Ken's book page 9)

CycleGuy

Quote from: minnie on January 22, 2016, 10:52:06 AM
   Is a "perfect" vacuum attainable?
   ie. No QVZPE field.
            John.

Not with the materials we have available. The main problem is that metal is the best shielding material to use to block electromagnetic fields (which the QVZPE field is comprised of, given that it's a magnetohydrodynamic fluid, a cold plasma), but at extremely high frequencies, metal becomes transparent to those electromagnetic waves. I've theorized that a combination of graphene, then bismuth (one of the densest stable metals), then lead, then iron (to fritter away any remaining electromagnetic fields as eddy currents) would make an effective shield:

From another of my posts, some random thoughts into avenues of research:
Quote
1) What if, rather than trying to reflect or block QVZPE wave modes at the exterior of the walls, we attempt to absorb them, and fritter them away in eddy currents? I'm thinking along the lines of research into high-efficiency solar panels, which trap a photon in a "maze" of sorts, a contorted waveguide, allowing all the energy of that photon to go toward knocking electrons free rather than being partially reflected.

2) We know that the Casimir effect cannot block high-frequency wave modes because the metal plates become transparent to the energy at high frequencies (at and above the X-ray range), yet it is the high frequencies (high energies) which would reduce the QVZPE field density the most.

3) We'd have to use a metal or some substance or combination of substances that can block or absorb x-rays and higher, along with the lower frequency modes of the QVZPE.

4) Perhaps an iron plate, a layer of lead, then a layer of bismuth, and graphene sheets on the outside? The iron plate would be the base to eddy-current away any induced fields that make it all the way through the shield (and it being the most atomically stable element, it would better withstand an artificially lowered QVZPE environment than any other element), the lead would be there to block ultra-high frequency waves, the bismuth would do the same as the lead and would repel magnetic fields due to being diamagnetic, and the graphene would absorb electromagnetic radiation all the way up to the THz range, and convert it to an electrical current.

5) I'd made a note earlier about graphene making a good Casimir cavity wall material. This is because graphene has a near zero nuclear magnetic moment, it's a zero-gap semiconductor, it's an excellent conductor with the lowest known resistivity at room temperature, and it can convert electromagnetic radiation of any wavelength into an electrical current.

Some strange effects occur when you lower the QVZPE field density in a Casimir cavity... space in that cavity shrinks, time in that cavity speeds up, and in a complete absence of QVZPE field, all elements would experience an effect whereby their electron orbits were no longer sustained at their 1s orbitals... so in a complete absence of QVZPE field, any element would undergo electron capture decay up the Periodic Table, transmuting into lighter and lighter elements until it hit hydrogen, whereupon it'd convert into a neutron, a photon in the gamma ray energy range, and an electron neutrino. That'd give off a tremendous amount of energy, orders of magnitude more than a nuclear weapon's fissioning or fusing of a similar amount of material.

CycleGuy

Quote from: sadang on January 22, 2016, 12:01:06 PM
CycleGuy, you still keep paying exaggerate attention to minor aspects of what I write, and completely avoid the important aspects. I consider Universe care about my opinion as well as of your opinion, because we both shape it!

No, we don't "shape it". We merely reside within it. The universe existed long before we did, and will exist long after we're extinct. Our opinions of the universe amount to quite literally nothing to the universe.

Quote from: sadang on January 22, 2016, 12:01:06 PM
The Universe is not something external to you and me and everything compose and define it. And Universe is reality in the same manner as I wrote above. Or as I wrote in a previous message, thinking that Universe obey the human laws as we define it from here on Earth, is a huge mistake and a big lack of wisdom!

You've got that backwards... they're not our rules, they're the rules the universe follows. We merely did the research to discover those rules.

As an experiment, I invite you to wish just as hard as you possibly can that the sun splits into two distinct orbs... invite all your friends, hold hands, sing Kumbaya, chant, burn incense... the sun will remain as it is. Your New Age mysticism is nothing more than a mind f*ck that weak minds use when they can't fathom the underlying rules of the universe. Deal with that reality as you will.

Quote from: sadang on January 22, 2016, 12:01:06 PM
So, keep believing the Universe is defined by QVZPE if this is your way, and continue on Descartes method of knowledge. And will shape a reality accordingly! But, from time to time rethink what are the meaning of such concepts as matter, particles, mass, momentum, field and static.

"As I revolve in my mind the thoughts in answer to your question I find the most wonderful thing is the utter aberration of the scientific mind during the last twenty-five years. In that time the relativity theory, the electron theory, the quantum theory, the theory of radioactivity and others have been worked out and developed to an amazing degree. And yet probably not less than 90 per cent of what is thought today to be demonstrable scientific truth is nothing but unrealizable dreams." - Nikola Tesla - Galveston Daily News, Galveston, Texas, March 13, 1932, Page 11

"Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract (unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense." - Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum (from Ken's book page 9)

Nikola Tesla invented a lot. That doesn't make him correct on everything. Your inability to discern between what he got right and what he got tremendously, laughably wrong is the same reason behind your inability to discern that Wheeler's hobby theory and his take on magnets is likewise tremendously, laughably wrong.

Nikola Tesla, for instance, said he'd received messages from Mars... so according to your way of thinking, there is intelligent life on Mars. See how ludicrous that sounds? No, you probably don't.

sadang

CycleGuy and what make you believe the Universe is older than you or me? The human short matter life? Did you bent on what is a human being? A particle, a field or more than that?

No, that rules are not the rules the Universe follows, they are the rules we defined according to our current understanding about the Universe. And looking at it as something external to our own will and consciousness.

And stop with these silly example of naive experiments, I was not born yesterday. I have the ability and capacity to discern very well between current science dogma and other alternative solutions to it.

I finally understood your mind. You're too seized by the theory of quantum to see or accept anything else. And more than that, you do not want any change! You feel comfortable in that situation, and fear of the unknown! Specific to current scientists, not to see the circularity of current theories.

Keep going on your way and make abstraction of my words. My best wishes to your endeavor! And don't forget this is the Ken's topic about the vortex magnetism and not about quantum fantasies!

CycleGuy

Quote from: sadang on January 22, 2016, 01:13:25 PM
CycleGuy and what make you believe the Universe is older than you or me?

Oh for crying out loud.

Ok, we're done. You're delusional and clue-repellent, and it appears you're getting worse, not better. Into the Bozo Bin with you.