Inertia Drive project. RFDD.

[tinman]

A US patent was issued some years ago claiming to provide unidirectional inertial thrust employing a unique elliptical path for its counter-rotating weights. Sorry, remember no more details at all and the notebook containing the copy of the patent is buried under so much other junk it would a real excavation to dig it up.

Have you done a patent search?



CANGAS 63

Yes i did have a look at a few designs,but they wernt the same. The challenge is to reduce the orbit of the weights(i refer to them as sattellites)to give us our elliptical orbit's,without there being an equal /opposite force applied to the rotating mass.This is where force diversion comes into play.We need only divert a small amount of force to create an imballance within the system.The more force we can divert,the more unidirectional force we achieve. Yes-we are trying to do what is said to be not possable,but everyone here is trying to do that-unfortunately,so far no luck. But we keep trying non the less.

[tinman]

But....Newton's equal and opposing reaction is expected to have a force component which has a unit vector exactly antiparallel the original action force unit vector, with the two magnitudes being exactly equal.


CANGAS 64

I should try and word thing's a little more in detail.I would agree that the reaction force is equal to the force of the action,but will the reaction cause a mass to travel in the opposite direction to that of the action force that created that reaction.

I guess im more trying to say that the direction of travel of a mass that has had a force applied to it,isnt always in an opposite direction to the moving mass that applied that force.

[tinman]

Just a quick video update on the RFDD.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZFusjLL3dg&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w

[MarkE]

The machining looks nicely done.

[telecom]

I should try and word thing's a little more in detail.I would agree that the reaction force is equal to the force of the action,but will the reaction cause a mass to travel in the opposite direction to that of the action force that created that reaction.

I guess im more trying to say that the direction of travel of a mass that has had a force applied to it,isnt always in an opposite direction to the moving mass that applied that force.

I think its important to note that reaction force acts normally to the surface
where action is applied.