Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

[synchro1]

Two coils built just like this in parallel is just what we need, connected to a variable capacitor: The more the ferrite core's inserted into the coil, the higher the inductance and the greater the matching capacitance needed from the butterfly to lower the frequency of the LLC tank oscillation.

Wraping the end of the ferrite core with a Primary coil and pulsing it with D.C. at resonant frequency supplies the design with a second avenue for input to sustain the sine wave oscillation; A great efficiency improvement.

[Magluvin]

Two coils built just like this in parallel is just what we need, connected to a variable capacitor: The more the ferrite core's inserted into the coil, the higher the inductance and the greater the matching capacitance needed from the butterfly to lower the frequency of the LLC tank oscillation.

Wraping the end of the ferrite core with a Primary coil and pulsing it with D.C. at resonant frequency supplies the design with a second avenue for input to sustain the sine wave oscillation; A great efficiency improvement.

Always wondered if Teslas electric car motor had a resonant freq, and possibly built to be so. It was claimed to be an AC motor. So I wonder what the effect would be on the output if the motor windings were in resonance with input.

Mags

[TinselKoala]

Tinselkoala has apparently chosen to ignore me. He once again has proven himself completely worthless for any kind of constructive dialogue. I plan to ignore him completely from this point forward.

Nobody has ever missed anything important by ignoring YOU.

You are the one who constantly misrepresents the work of others, and you just posted a photo of four FIXED INDUCTANCE chokes and called them "variable inductors". Leave me out of your ignorant fantasies and false statements.

And if you were paying attention at all you'd know that I have already shown the value range of those loopsticks and incorporated them in various tuned circuit designs that actually work. And they can be looked up on the internet as well.

Ignore these, idiot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80D92QaOcM4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqBK00tuI8Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjgemF5zpeE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHI7LnVWBlY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyVZWkYAvkk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcGTBA7NoVI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeIWpkywGXs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8S02SB-ENA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd1VNFBFPik

[synchro1]

Nobody has ever missed anything important by ignoring YOU.

You are the one who constantly misrepresents the work of others, and you just posted a photo of four FIXED INDUCTANCE chokes and called them "variable inductors". Leave me out of your ignorant fantasies and false statements.

And if you were paying attention at all you'd know that I have already shown the value range of those loopsticks and incorporated them in various tuned circuit designs that actually work. And they can be looked up on the internet as well.

Ignore these, idiot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80D92QaOcM4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqBK00tuI8Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjgemF5zpeE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHI7LnVWBlY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyVZWkYAvkk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcGTBA7NoVI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeIWpkywGXs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8S02SB-ENA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd1VNFBFPik

@Tinselkoala,

You just called me an idiot. I don't want you reposting on my thread. Your're just a stinking fraud. You can't SIMPLY tell us what the "Inductance range" of your loopstick is. You're asking us to agonize through nine of your tedious videos to find out. The coil I showed uses the same thickness wire and wraping style as the A.C. tube spinner video, and the ferrite core is very thick and highly saturatable. Turning the bolt moves the core in and out.

Litz is just more "Hocus Pocus" from you phony disinformation artists. The "Loopstick's" just another piece of crap. The core is too thin to do anything practical.

[synchro1]

The best approach would be to "Mag Amp" the core with a D.C. primary winding. This is an inefficient method, but allows for a reinforcing pulse at LC resonant frequency. Saturating the core wih D.C. current eliminates any inductance value to the coil. Placing magnets in a coil core alters performance compared to air. Saturating the ferrite creates an electromagnet. Adding inductance by reducing the D.C. current would be matched by increasing the capacitance to slow the rotor R.P.M.

Air has greater inductance value to the coil then a saturated ferrite core, or permanent magnets. We can precisly control rotor speed with this "Mag Amp" core saturator primary wrap, maybe a few hundred turns of 28 gauge. This creates an additional pathway for pulsed D.C. input.

The D.C. pulse should be able to spin the tube rotor at high power alone from the same source battery that charges the tank capacitor. The core saturator would be powered by the same battery. The core should be set back away from the magnet rotor, it doesn't need to extend completely through. The core would retract all the way coupled with reduced capacitance for top sine wave R.P.M. This speed up would be coupled with a reduction in input.