Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device

[ARMCORTEX]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_Z1S_1GlxA&list=UUNvxm6pTplRsUUOPEuDM8eg

I restart this thread, because the grumage thread is too big, and his replication not according to observed video.

I believe I have solved these devices, and will refer to them as kinetic oscillators, they simply are a form of pulse magnetic motor, but with pulleys.

But not like Bedini, this is like ideal magnetic situation, tangantial and shielded, so dollar for dollar it is in fact superior technique.

The trick revolves around pulley squeeze  by hidden eccentric or on a hidden eccentric on floating bouncy wheel and any variation thereof.

It is not complicated.

This video of turkey and the video of Chas Campbell indicates to me that the Lead out theory is real, wich is approved by mainstream now

The machine works by barely noticeable lobe on the yellow reflector, wich causes pulley squeeze and pulling, read my analysis back in this thread.

http://www.overunity.com/14655/1939-gravity-power-multiply-power-by-1200/450/#.VAYUivldV8E

Thus creating pulses of tangantial force, and this causes OU when right freq is hit, and this depends on load.

http://www.filedropper.com/dissection ( my dissection of chas campbell)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgk0HfXhU9M

Now by reading this, you understand better the Device of future industrial factories, kapanadze device cannot compete.

I will fight now fight anybody who disagree with my theories and refer to them as lowly minds.

[zoelra]

A good example of a horizontally pulsed-wheel is shown in the video below.  It is worth a look.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhwQt1tJYa8


The Lead-out theory presented by Mr. Lawrence Tseung is very easy to understand and should be easy to build and verify.  My concern is after publishing his theory many years ago, he has NOT been able to convince the scientific establishment of it's validity and to my knowledge there are no running devices using this principle ... odd for such a simple idea ...

[ARMCORTEX]

That is a technique, but I like pulley better.

That is good short pulse tho.

Why do you say there is not much proof, I can count 5 devices of pulse pulley arrangement, perhaps more in eastern europe.

It is clear that there is proof.

Chas Cambell had legitimate device.

If you wanna fight me , you know what my response will be. I will use the L word.

[ARMCORTEX]

My question: Lawrence I have a question for you.

Would it be easier to pulse a wheel with 4 x  (or 2 x) heavy weights and light frame , or a totally uniform mass distribution flywheel with no definite ''frequency'', an infinite number of small pendulums so to speak. While a 4 x mass point could have 1 tapping  (or 2) per weight, as they accelerate already. I have an idea for program controllable hammer like kinetic pulser, not magnet, but blunt mass with retractable high strenght steel solenoid tip.

You say ''to pulse @ wrong time a pendulum is counter productive''. How to identify right time with uniform flywheel ? Would it be simpler to design a stick flywheel with 2 weights @ tips ?

His answer

The easiest experiment to determine the right frequency for a swing is shown in the Milkovic 2 stage pendulum.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8

If you have an unbalanced wheel, you can pulse it at different rotational speeds.  In the case of the Tong wheel, we determined the best pulsing time experimentally.   The device was adjsted until the current reading was minimum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8

We did not experiment with uniform flysheel.

conclusion: Lawrence doesnt know the answer, too many variables, technique must be done in a way that its adjustable vs its load,thus clever build planification.

But, it is very pertinent, to be able to calculate or estimate necessary force, I ish to have a excel sheet one day, that will help me design rotationg pulsers.

[ARMCORTEX]

Looking @ the chas campbell video, he does seem to have something that looks like capacitors, to create a jerk, as shown by grumage.

This is speculation, it could be stock as well. But probably mismatched on purpose.

More powerful and sharp the pulse the better, only frequency can be offbeat.

But that is only half the story, rest is the tension bouncing, as we can see. So it is a deliberate pulser.

We know, that with a constant load, a constant beat is needed, as shows wonderfully the water wheel video, this is good to know.
But as he say, he had to play with the  belt ratio, to find the right torque load.

Reminds me of LC problem, you use the formula to know what bandwidth you need, by anticipation then get proper equipment.

Anticipation, forward thinking, caracteristics, formula. All is classic engineering.

So the next question, wich no one seems to have an answer to, in any book. Is how does geometrical arrangement of flywheel vs its load play on the frequency that is needed to gain the Lead in energy ? I guess Lawrence hides from us important math.

Or is it totally a quetion of energy rates, and not geomety ?

It is an important question to ask.