Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5

[TinselKoala]

I'm sure there is. But you have already demonstrated with your posts, especially this last one, that you do not understand the phenomena with which you are working.

Let me see you demonstrate something _unusual_ or that cannot be accounted for by our present actual understanding of electrical phenomena, but is predicted by your understanding of what you have seen and cited. Please. Your sparking bowl example is not such a thing.

as a spark crosses a gap, the electron potential is increased, again adding free energy to the mix

Please provide some reference or unequivocal demonstration that supports this statement.

[Void]

Hi all,
It is maybe  last video about Radiant energy which I made.
This one is about Radiant energy on atomic and molecular level, which open  new horison about charging the batteries or producing hydrogen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq9AvKU26A4&list=UUpiJQKHA_4sZUhJj1CdfhWg
All The Best,
Milan

Hi Milan. I watched all five of your videos on Tesla Radiant energy.
Lots of interesting info. Lots to think about. Thanks for the videos.
All the best...

[freethisone]

hi void, i was hoping to get your post. i have been watching your movies more a long time.


these are my movies here you can find them  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M6uI9uZARA


but i have one other that i want you to see.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w60SIHwOztk
you can skip to the end. it is showing a self oscillating circuit with a high charge potential..
at the end i simply touch it. i do get a bigger shock. it don't like me compared to a small conductor.

[freethisone]

I'm sure there is. But you have already demonstrated with your posts, especially this last one, that you do not understand the phenomena with which you are working.

Let me see you demonstrate something _unusual_ or that cannot be accounted for by our present actual understanding of electrical phenomena, but is predicted by your understanding of what you have seen and cited. Please. Your sparking bowl example is not such a thing.

hello, this is a very derogatory response to my post.  why would you say i don't know what i am talking about in reference to my posts.

if you would like to give me a reason why the sparking bowl is no such thing?

keep it civil.  i have done these experiments, so i assure you i know what i am doing..

here is enough of my work with a complete explanation  and results..    I can take this much further if needed.

if you need help understanding this phenomena refer to Mit lecturer Walter Lewin..

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1566.0

[TinselKoala]

hello, this is a very derogatory response to my post.  why would you say i don't know what i am talking about in reference to my posts.

if you would like to give me a reason why the sparking bowl is no such thing?

keep it civil.  i have done these experiments, so i assure you i know what i am doing..

here is enough of my work with a complete explanation  and results..    I can take this much further if needed.

if you need help understanding this phenomena refer to Mit lecturer Walter Lewin..

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1566.0

I have asked you to provide support for this statement:

so free energy is in the air. its called ions. also as a spark crosses a gap, the electron potential is increased, again adding free energy to the mix..

And you have not done so. The fact that you think "free energy is in the air. its called ions" (sic) indicates to me very solidly that you do not understand what you are doing. You can refer to as many of Lewin's lectures as you like but since you don't understand what he is talking about, every time you do it drives home my point even more. The videos do not demonstrate what you  claim that they do and that other website is just another statement of the wrong things you have claimed in this thread.

If you want anyone to take you seriously you should be able to _demonstrate_ the validity of your claims, or cite references that actually do support you, rather than contradict you as Lewin's _entire course_ does.