Gyroscopic Inertia Generator

[Scorch]

11/16/14

Hello all. 

I managed to complete some more G1 assembly today.

This is the three phase alternator rotors.

It does appear to be very nice engineering here including dual rotors that provide for magnetic flux on both sides of the coils for increased efficiency.
As compared to a more conventional alternator that might only have a single magnetic rotor inside a field winding surrounded with energy robbing iron cores, steel housings, hardware and etcetera.

Pretty straightforward assembly without any challenges other than the occasional plastic bur in the tapped screw holes.
Rotors are 6.375" diameter and appear to be acrylic.
Each rotor has 16 poles.
Magnets are-

16 pcs of Countersunk Magnets 1"L x 1/2"W x 1/8" Thick N42 - North face
www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=BX082CS-N&cat=173
16 pcs of Countersunk Magnets 1"L x 1/2"W x 1/8" Thick N42 - South face
www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=BX082CS-S&cat=173
Also sold as pairs-
www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=BX082CS-P&cat=173
And-
32 pcs of 1"L x 1/2"W x 1/8" Thick N42
www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=BX082

Countersunk magnets are mounted with stainless steel screws then additional magnets merely sit on top of these mounted magnets and held in place their own magnetism.
Although, if I wanted to operate such an alternator at a high RPM, I would probably glue these 'face' magnets in place.

And, BTW, it really does help to have a magnetic pole identifier tool for building such things.
I used to merely use a magnet of known polarity but I am spoiled now that I have an electronic detector.   

That is all for now.

Enjoy the experimentation, learning, and gaining of knowledge.

Kindest regards;

}:>

[TinselKoala]

11/16/14

Hello all. 

(snip)
And, BTW, it really does help to have a magnetic pole identifier tool for building such things.
I used to merely use a magnet of known polarity but I am spoiled now that I have an electronic detector.   

(snip)

Yes, the electronic pole detector is a neat item. I hope you didn't spend too much for yours! Here's a very simple circuit using the sensor chip and a couple LEDs from a worn-out computer case fan, and one 10 cent resistor:

(This circuit can also be used, obviously, for various other purposes like switching a bipolar pulse motor, etc. )

[MileHigh]

Synchro1, I don't know what magic you worked to squeeze in posting #63 but it doesn't matter.  You are just repeating foolishness that was rebutted a long time ago.  I am certain that you remember Gyula discussing the flaws with the paperclip experiment but like some immature child you are "forgetting" now.  I will keep this short because it is off-topic to this thread.  Everything I said to you earlier still applies.  You're a spineless coward.  Stop the nonsensical idiocy and GROW UP.

[Low-Q]

You impudently prevented Conradelectro from testing the coil with a capacitive load as I instructed him to, causing me great embarrassment, and failed test results.

Any attempt to test an over unity device allways end up in embarrassment and failed results. Such people avoids public attention for a while.
This is something any over unity inventor must live with. They will fail every time they try.


However, there are inventors who test fusion. Still not more energy out than you put in, but for sure more USEFUL energy out than you put in.


Vidar

[synchro1]

Any attempt to test an over unity device allways end up in embarrassment and failed results. Such people avoids public attention for a while.
This is something any over unity inventor must live with. They will fail every time they try.


However, there are inventors who test fusion. Still not more energy out than you put in, but for sure more USEFUL energy out than you put in.


Vidar

Doug Konzen's magnet backed ferrite core generator coil would test positively as an overunity coil if he wired a capacitor in series with a fast switching diode between the coil leads instead of dead shorting them. Not only would the coil speed the rotor up and lower input in the sweet range of one half inch, it would generate and store additional current from the interaction of the backing magnets with the output coil windings. The generator coil backing magnets produce a separate and very powerful oscillating field that crosses the output coil windings. This extra field oscillation couples additively with rotor induction. Looping the stored magnet core generator capacitor output back to source by simply attaching wires directly from the capacitor leads to the power source electrodes would result in a COP>1. It's incomprehensible how wicked people like Milehigh can be allowed to act as vituperative as he has shown with no administrative sanctioning to cover a truth so simple and easy to replicate.