Gyroscopic Inertia Generator

[TinselKoala]

(another video making false claims and showing improper measurements)

Nuñez is a shameless self-promoter who is trying to make money selling his products through the use of false claims.

Note that the audio amplifier is _part of the system_ and so the mains input power to the amplifier really should be considered as part of the INPUT power.

Furthermore, Synchro... do you not know what a large degree of Reactive Power looks like on an oscilloscope? Current and voltage out of phase, hence producing "VARs" which cannot be used to power anything? It looks like the screenshot below. If you are impressed with a high degree of VARs, a little bit of wireless power transmission and so forth you need to look at my videos on those topics again, because there is nothing new, not covered by conventional electrodynamics or which support his claims of "overunity" in any of Nuñez's performances.You will never see a proper comparison done by this person, comparing a "rodin coil" with an ordinary coil of the same amount of wire.

[tinman]

Nuñez is a shameless self-promoter who is trying to make money selling his products through the use of false claims.

Note that the audio amplifier is _part of the system_ and so the mains input power to the amplifier really should be considered as part of the INPUT power.

Furthermore, Synchro... do you not know what a large degree of Reactive Power looks like on an oscilloscope? Current and voltage out of phase, hence producing "VARs" which cannot be used to power anything? It looks like the screenshot below. If you are impressed with a high degree of VARs, a little bit of wireless power transmission and so forth you need to look at my videos on those topics again, because there is nothing new, not covered by conventional electrodynamics or which support his claims of "overunity" in any of Nuñez's performances.You will never see a proper comparison done by this person, comparing a "rodin coil" with an ordinary coil of the same amount of wire.

TK-This cant be faulse cliam's,and the device must work as claimed-->it has LED's

[Scorch]

Hello everybody.

I regret to inform you that there appears a preponderance of evidence this forum is no longer the supportive place it used to be for the sharing these new ideas or an experiment such as this.
Including the obvious ongoing, continuous, stream of negativity distractions, arguments, and controversies that are becoming very seriously distracting, time consuming or, otherwise, totally detrimental to these explorations and this creative process to the point of actually being damaging not only to this experiment and these assets but also damaging to many other good people as well. 

My experience with this forum and this thread has been entirely negative and totally OPPOSITE of my previous experiences with the other OU thread I participated in years ago where the commenters where always very supportive.

Oh well. Your loss I guess. *shrugs* 

If anybody here actually believes in such things as this creative process, these positive explorations of these new sciences, and practical applications of these verifiable physics and math; feel free to continue viewing the progress of this experiment in my FA gallery found here-
www.furaffinity.net/user/scorch/

All links or references to this forum, that were originally in my FA gallery, have now been removed due to all the negativity, controversy, frivolous claims, spam, personal, "school yard bully", behavior and attacks against other inventors and researchers (including those who advertise here), commercial damages or, otherwise, a total failure to provide any substantive, positive, support for the replication and testing of 1 (one) experiment.

I'm out of here.

Kindest regards;

}:>

[TinselKoala]

TK-This cant be faulse cliam's,and the device must work as claimed-->it has LED's

Of course it does. That should be proof enough for anyone, right?

Let's review: The Rodin coil video shows a pretty coil device fed by a mains-powered audio amplifier. The power used to run the amplifier is conveniently not measured by the claimant. A single LED is lit a few inches away by field pickup, using another many-turn copper wire coil. The "output" of the Rodin coil is measured to show a few Watts of VARs, non-usable power, which is confirmed on the scope screen to be VARs, very close to 90 degrees phase shift, with some distortion caused by tapping a little bit of real power off to light up -- rather dimly -- the big bank of LEDs.
Right?

Now watch this, one of my microQEG demonstrations, and then tell me again how much "OU" that the Rodin coil makes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkXrhRqlQE4

Note that I don't hide most of the true input power by failing to measure the _audio amplifier_ input power as Nunez does. I don't even have an audio amplifier! I'm drawing less than 2.5 Watts of _straight DC_ in total, not oscillating at high audio frequencies, so there is no doubt about my input power, and the scope shows very clearly some output figures.  And then I power a real load, a DC motor plus an incandescent light bulb, with the output through close _wireless_ coupling while also powering the 3 LEDs at a greater distance with the tuned receptor. Once again, we have a situation where making measurements on MY system in the same way that this "OU" claimant does on HIS system, yields much more "OU" than he has pretended to show. And I think that a little intelligent tuning and driving would even help his system work better, for certain values of "better". 

[TinselKoala]

Hello everybody.

I regret to inform you that there appears a preponderance of evidence this forum is no longer the supportive place it used to be for the sharing these new ideas or an experiment such as this.
Including the obvious ongoing, continuous, stream of negativity distractions, arguments, and controversies that are becoming very seriously distracting, time consuming or, otherwise, totally detrimental to these explorations and this creative process to the point of actually being damaging not only to this experiment and these assets but also damaging to many other good people as well. 

My experience with this forum and this thread has been entirely negative and totally OPPOSITE of my previous experiences with the other OU thread I participated in years ago where the commenters where always very supportive.

Oh well. Your loss I guess. *shrugs* 

If anybody here actually believes in such things as this creative process, these positive explorations of these new sciences, and practical applications of these verifiable physics and math; feel free to continue viewing the progress of this experiment in my FA gallery found here-
www.furaffinity.net/user/scorch/

All links or references to this forum, that were originally in my FA gallery, have now been removed due to all the negativity, controversy, frivolous claims, spam, personal attacks against others, commercial damages or, otherwise, a total failure to provide any substantive, positive, support for the replication and testing of 1 (one) experiment.

I'm out of here.

Kindest regards;

}:>

Awww, he's taking his toys and going home. Aww.

Any _really serious_ experimenter would simply respond to the negativity with _proofs_ that the negative commenters are wrong, or at least try to have a serious discussion.  But of course if no such proofs can be made, or the experimenter can't actually discuss the points made by the commenters, maybe dropping out is the only way to save face.