Gyroscopic Inertia Generator

[Low-Q]

FYI- I'm still working with the G1 but have decided to go ahead and offer the Q3 up for auction if anybody here is interested in what is actually a very well built experimental platform (at a fraction of the retail price) now that I am done working with that experiment and I'm gaining more interest in HHO technologies that are continuing to improve over time. 

See: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Alternative-Energy-Experimental-System-Quanta-Magnetics-Q3-Charge-Accelerator-/151645123279

Kindest regards;
}:>

HHO is very inefficient to produce and use. I haven't the figures, but you put in energy for HHO production where some is dissipated as heat - which is energy that does not produce HHO.
Further, HHO is used for example to run a combustion engine where the Carnot efficiency cannot exceed approx 70% under ideal conditions. Then you put a generator on the engineshaft, and loose another 10 - 15% efficiency. Then you use the AC from the generator, rectified, and charging a battery or capacitor - you loose another 5% or so.
Under ideal conditions you might reach an efficiency of approx 55-60% - in practice below 25-30% efficiency.


Vidar

[Low-Q]

Gyroscopic inertia was used as an experiment for use as an energy reservoir in space. Don't remember exactly the details, but the inertia of the mass would release energy on the expense of angular velocity. Arrest me if I'm wrong :-)

[Scorch]

4/12/15

There appears to be some things about HHO systems that are generally not known.
Including the presence of a 'secondary gas' and HHO reactors that can operate on resonance alone and without electricity beyond that to power a pump (which could be engine driven).
And other factors such as very specific reactor clearances of .5mm or less and plasma ignition systems and the energetic expansion of the secondary gas which is NOT a combustion process within the engine.
See:
http://www.globalbemvoices.com/videos/lectures/one-million-cavitating-water-electrolyzers/

One MUST bring most or all of these factors together in order to produce enough efficiency for a highly inefficient, conventional internal combustion engine driven generator to actually run the system well enough to produce enough water based fuel to keep the generator running in self contained mode.

Such as this prototype demonstrating a relatively simple (dry cell) HHO reactor that was used to power the generator in a self contained, mobile system powering the fuel reactor and a halogen flood light (until vibration caused halogen bulb to fail) then transported through an elevator and out into the parking lot while system continued to operate-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMlciNOyo_U
The above system referenced in this video also included a custom, high powered plasma spark ignition system that is geared to the main shaft (on generator end) for proper ignition power and timing in the engine.

And other very interesting factors such as the appearance of 'structured water'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZrAnkUNmAI

Or very high output at low power levels-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsPHvz_SAWA

I am JUST starting to study these things beginning with this compilation of links and other information including Dr. King's power point file on my social media forum here-
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/6628277/

And I do plan to build stuff. . .

}:>

HHO is very inefficient to produce and use. I haven't the figures, but you put in energy for HHO production where some is dissipated as heat - which is energy that does not produce HHO.
Further, HHO is used for example to run a combustion engine where the Carnot efficiency cannot exceed approx 70% under ideal conditions. Then you put a generator on the engineshaft, and loose another 10 - 15% efficiency. Then you use the AC from the generator, rectified, and charging a battery or capacitor - you loose another 5% or so.
Under ideal conditions you might reach an efficiency of approx 55-60% - in practice below 25-30% efficiency.


Vidar

[Low-Q]

And I do plan to build stuff. . .

}:>

Keep doing that. Nothing is more educating than building stuff and test stuff in real life :-)


Vidar

[Scorch]

Yes indeed. Nothing better than hands on experiential gaining of knowledge which is a priceless education compared to conventional 'classroom' or 'book' learning.
They say we all have TWO educations. That which is taught to us by others and that which we teach to ourselves.
And we do tend learn a lot MORE from our failures. 

Kindest regards;
}:>

Keep doing that. Nothing is more educating than building stuff and test stuff in real life :-)


Vidar