Vaccinations; recent developments

[Pirate88179]

Very unfortunately for the health of the People,
much data put forth in published 'studies' is
pure fabrication.

Where is your proof for this statement?  What data is false?  Who has proven this?  What studies are using false data?

More, unsubstantiated posts.  You may believe this but, you do not show us the evidence as to why you believe this.  So, why should we just take your word?  Did you just take some other person's word?

Do you see what I mean?

Bill

[sarkeizen]

A wee bit more food for thought:

I think they look more stupid this way (like that ominous thunderstorm over the evil vaccinating CVS pharmacy LOL) but YMMV.

[sarkeizen]

Where is your proof for this statement? 

Deeper than that.  What would have to be true for sea monkey's statement to be true.  What does "much of the data" mean?  Most?  To anyone with a little bit of background in statistics it's pretty obvious if SM is implying that MOST data is wrong/false then anyone of asserts that is far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far more likely not to know what they are talking about.

But if you're Seamonkey you don't care.

[SeaMonkey]

Where is your proof for this statement?  What data is false?  Who has proven this?  What studies are using false data?

More, unsubstantiated posts.  You may believe this but, you do not show us the evidence as to why you believe this.  So, why should we just take your word?  Did you just take some other person's word?

Do you see what I mean?

I can encourage you to make the effort to find
the 'proofs' but I cannot prevent you from doing
so.  Only you yourself are able to prevent yourself
from doing the essential research and digging.

Even the MainStream Media will on occasion report
falsified study data.  Not nearly as often as they
should but only enough to create the impression that
they are credible in what they report.  Most cases of
falsified data are reported only in Technical Journals
or by private correspondence among high echelon
personnel.  Most reports are never presented to the
general public.

You should not 'take anyone's word' for any subject of
discussion.  Everything that you may wonder about should
be proven to your own satisfaction.  Even when (especially
when) the subject matter is presented by those who you've
been programmed to see as ethical authorities.

It isn't always easy to find TRUTH.  In fact, it is becoming
more difficult.  While we still have the internet, hone your
research skills to find TRUTH.  The liars and deceivers are
working to suppress the ability of the internet to counter
their lies with TRUTH.  You know, the old 'conspiracy theory'
gig.

Or not, as you choose.

[sarkeizen]

Only you yourself are able to prevent yourself from doing the essential research and digging.

So you believe the things you post?  If so, doesn't that mean YOU have done the digging? If so where is that data?   Isn't asking you for the data which proved this to YOUR satisfaction a reasonable step in finding the truth?

I mean, I'm pretty sure all you need is some line on a poorly designed graphic before you believe something (Well, as long as it conforms to your pre-existing beliefs) but it would be interesting to find out different and perhaps show you how incredibly lax and stupid your digging process is.