Vaccinations; recent developments

[sarkeizen]

Glad to see this bugs you so much.

Nice try Sarkey.  But no dice.  What you've provided is in reality a regurgitation of Medical Field Propaganda

Actually no.  See what I've provided are references to studies and argument based on the principles of math and logic.  Since you're so ignorant I'll step you through a recent one.  For example when I talked about Angell's article - I noted:

a) That the only piece of actual medical research was one study - this can't be "medical field propaganda" because it's a quote from someone YOU endorsed...unless you are the one spreading "medical field propaganda".
b) Was authored by someone strongly critical of antidepressants, SSRI's in particular - this is simply a matter of public record.  Kirsch the the author of a whole book about this - if you cared to know anything about the field you criticize which you don't.
c) Was superceded by a LARGER and STRONGER study by Turner.  Which, you're right his whole team might just be paid medical stooges but...that's unlikely because Kirsch himself followed this study up with one where the EFFECT WAS EVEN STRONGER.  So unless the person who's research was the only medical basis given for the quote you endorsed was actually a puppet saying what the medical field shadow government wants - which means you were in fact spreading "medical field propaganda".  If that's not true - then your hypothesis is incorrect.

Want me to take you through the Wakefield article next?

you are entirely dependent upon what is fed you by The Establishment

I contend that what I want is evidence that is high-quality as deemed by the rules of probability theory.  You seem to be saying that only crappy evidence for alternative points of view exist.  If I'm wrong I would love to see that evidence.   However nobody seems capable of hitting Ctrl-C and then Ctrl-V to move that indisputable evidence from it's easy to find source to a post here.  Again, Bayes rule tells us that either such evidence does not exist or is not compelling or is not easy to find.   This isn't the work of the Establishment just math.  Ever learn any?  Didn't think so.

Truth[/b] is too fearful a proposition for you to embrace.

A statement which makes no sense considering how frequently I've asked for strong evidence.

[SeaMonkey]

...considering how frequently I've asked for strong evidence.

The 'evidence' is freely available from numerous
sources; many of them have been 'linked' throughout
the prior postings.

If you choose not to peruse and digest those materials
then Spoon Feeding is not an option.  You're clearly
beyond infancy.

Oooops.  Wait a minute!  You are, aren't you?

Oh, the mind is a terrible thing to waste...

[sarkeizen]

The 'evidence' is freely available from numerous sources; many of them have been 'linked' throughout the prior postings.

Ah but what I asked for was STRONG evidence.  See the word "strong" is even right there in the passage you quoted.  Can you give me a link to evidence which is very, very strong?  Or preferably contains the strongest evidence available for some idea?  Didn't think so.

So when all you're offering is weak evidence then why would anyone care?  Especially when competing ideas have far stronger evidence.   Hey, you just killed your own "spoon feeding" argument.  Thanks.

[SeaMonkey]

More Evidence:

Vaccine horrors: Medical mutilation of innocent children exposed in GRAPHIC photos of "safe" vaccines gone horribly wrong
For those who are willing to learn Truth.

[kEhYo77]

New documentary, very revealing.


https://www.boughtmovie.net/free-viewing/thank-you.php?AFFID=NONE&optin=1

A quote from the movie:

"We need to have vaccinated vs vaccinated study if we want to have a real proof
and that study has never been done by the way.
There has never been a study looking at the safety of the ENTIRE vaccine schedule!"