What's wrong with this

[MarkE]

If you no longer wish to attempt argument that the device described in the outfloater.pdf file of you OP is viable, then I will take it that you have conceded that it is not viable.

[Floor]

This is just getting stranger and stranger.  If you have some point I have no idea what it is.

Are you asking me what my point is, or implying that there is no point.
For the sake of the comminication, please be more concise, less crytic.

[Floor]

@MarkE

Are you asking me what my point is, or implying that there is no point.
For the sake of the comminication, please be more concise, less crytic.

Should I restate this question in some other way ?

[ramset]

                                                                                                                                                            .

[Floor]

@MarkE

If you no longer wish to attempt argument that the device described in the outfloater.pdf file of you OP is viable, then I will take it that you have conceded that it is not viable.

You're not trying to put words into my mouth again are you ? 

Yes the device is viable, for it's intended purposes. and in the context of the subject of the discussion.

What your imply with your use of the word viable, is not the subject of the argument.

You have been informed at least two times as to the subject of this topic.

The fact that you have previously, responded to that information. is evidence that you know what the
subject is.

Please do not now, contend the subject is other than you know it to be, or that you have not understood.
Eespecially with me, the topics originator.

There is a problem here, with your honesty.

I think therfore it is you who should concede on this basis.
and withdraw form the topic.