Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[alan]

Hi Hanon,

Plastic Spacers ARE needed in the second configuration that I have shown. Not the first.

If I may suggest a re-read of the posts I have posted. I have covered this already! This is also covered in the pdf!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

I have difficulty understanding this picture; shouldn't the thumbs point in the opposite direction of the field of the primary (which isn't seen)?

[jbignes5]

Again this is nothing new.


http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1891-05-20.htm


Figure 113 is the method you are talking about.


The text I believe has been altered to deter the meaning of this setup.


"The above described arrangements refer only to the use of commercial coils as ordinarily constructed.  If it is desired to construct a coil for the express purpose of performing with it such experiments as I have described, or, generally, rendering it capable of withstanding the greatest possible difference of potential, then a construction as indicated in Fig. 17 / 113 will be found of advantage.  The coil in this case is formed of two independent parts which are wound oppositely, the connection between both being made near the primary.  The potential in the middle being zero, there is not much tendency to jump to the primary and not much insulation is required.  In some cases the middle point may, however, be connected to the primary or to the ground.  In such a coil the places of greatest difference of potential are far apart and the coil is capable of withstanding an enormous strain.  The two parts may be movable so as to allow a slight adjustment of the capacity effect."

Another reference to this design is also a Tesla creation:

http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm

Figure 3 is also this design slightly changed for very high voltage use.

If you read the whole document you will see it is mostly about very high frequencies and very high voltages. Their separation and use after the separation. Figure 17 shows a one terminal Motor and how to use it with this type of system of very high frequency oscillations which was proven by Kapanadze in his video's as well.  Shown here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVUN3GsekKQ


JBignes5

[TinselKoala]

Hi PIH123,

No - This is not what I said! Please Re-Read the post.

It depends on the setup. If the Output is AC then AC is needed on the scope. Vice Versa...

No, again I disagree!

"In alternating current (AC), the flow of electric charge periodically reverses direction." - A H-Bridge can Chop the DC and the flow of electric charge periodically reverses direction.

Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_current

This is just common-sense, so please don't try to confuse others here!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

(emphasis mine)

And there you have it. EMJunkie does not understand AC vs DC coupled scope channels or what they are used for.

http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14753/en/
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/courses/phy4802L/f05/lectures/oscilloscope.pdf
And many many more.

When you select "AC coupled" on your oscilloscope, the scope puts a _capacitor_ in series with the scope probe. This _removes_ any DC or very slow varying voltage from the displayed signal. This means, in turn, that you can have any amount of DC power in the measured signal and you will not see it on the scope's display.  It is almost _never_ appropriate to use AC-coupled scope channels for power measurements. In fact, even on "AC" signals, the use of AC-coupling moves the _average_ of the voltage signal down or up to the "zero" volts baseline. You can imagine the havoc this wreaks with any attempted power measurements.

The usual use of AC coupling is to remove large DC offsets so that small "ripples" riding on top of the DC may be read at higher resolution. It is NOT "for measuring AC" as EMJunkie seems to believe.

Please learn how to use your test equipment properly, so that people don't laugh at you when you go around claiming OU from ordinary configurations of parts.

[EMJunkie]

Hi folks, Hi emjunkie, well just fired it up and i am using an led bulb to see if it can power things, it lights the led bulb well.
When i use a wire to short the partnered secondary coils, the amp draw lowers from 360 milliamps while powering led bulb down to 260 milliamps using 3.7 volt input.
My other setup did not do this when a dead short was applied across partnered coils.
So does this sound like the right behavior so far, emjunkie.
Here is a pic of it.
peace love light

@SkyWatcher123,

Yes Sir! Very nice! Well Done!

For the others here, how long did it take you?

How much did it Cost you?

Are you happy there are already effect there that are worth perusing?

Try different Loads, increasing it slowly! Try to keep all Load's Resistive, Inductances can throw the measurements out! Very Nice! 

Very Nice, Well Done!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[EMJunkie]

(emphasis mine)

And there you have it. EMJunkie does not understand AC vs DC coupled scope channels or what they are used for.

http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14753/en/
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/courses/phy4802L/f05/lectures/oscilloscope.pdf
And many many more.

When you select "AC coupled" on your oscilloscope, the scope puts a _capacitor_ in series with the scope probe. This _removes_ any DC or very slow varying voltage from the displayed signal. This means, in turn, that you can have any amount of DC power in the measured signal and you will not see it on the scope's display.  It is almost _never_ appropriate to use AC-coupled scope channels for power measurements. In fact, even on "AC" signals, the use of AC-coupling moves the _average_ of the voltage signal down or up to the "zero" volts baseline. You can imagine the havoc this wreaks with any attempted power measurements.

The usual use of AC coupling is to remove large DC offsets so that small "ripples" riding on top of the DC may be read at higher resolution. It is NOT "for measuring AC" as EMJunkie seems to believe.

Please learn how to use your test equipment properly, so that people don't laugh at you when you go around claiming OU from ordinary configurations of parts.

@TinselKoala

The output on these devices are AC!

Everyone knows this capacitor is just a decoupling cap! Every Single Crow has its own Capacitance! Regardless of this Cap! I have never heard of such a silly provoking argument in my life!

Go away and distract others that worship your holiness  I don't want your idioms here!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!