Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

No cop-outs Chris.  If you are not capable of showing annotated configuration diagrams showing where the fields are, etc., along with an annotated timing diagram then you have nothing.  All that you have are meaningless words that you have been parroting from somewhere else.

If your statement is the "big thing" that we are not understanding but you understand it - make some diagrams and show us.  Or just admit that you can't.

We are already overloaded with meaningless claims from you that have gone nowhere.  Doing some diagrams would be very good.

MileHigh, we could have seen that in a one liner: "I don't want to do any work to help out, I want you to do it all for me"

Ok, I will go, spend many more hours trying to show yet more information diagrammatically.

TK is at least looking at this Tech. He is playing with it, he is seeing things happen  I thank him for that.

How many times has he said in the videos about the Noise or Chattering?

[Grumage]

Dear TinselKoala.

Over the last 2 pages of this thread in your replies to Void, you have linked Stivep ( Wesley ) with both Akula and Ruslan as working together.

Are you aware that Stivep lives in the United States ?

Stivep ( Wesley ) has just taken some of his valuable time to interpret the language spoken in the many videos to help others who may wish to replicate these devices and provide a possible explanation of how they work.   

Wesley has been steadily working for the last 18 months or so on the Coleman device, not as you are suggesting in collusion with either Akula or Ruslan.

I am attaching a link to Akula's latest video. No OU, but a very interesting transformer. The lamps are rated at 36 V 60 W incandescent. And those weird looking tubes to the right and left are Russian HV capacitors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYjREkw1v-A

Cheers Grum

[MarkE]

Hi MarkE. You see deceitful intentions, I see what is probably just some over enthusiasm and jumping the gun a bit.
I have certainly seen nothing much at all that warrants all the accusations and insults, etc.   Sometimes people may be a bit too
quick to jump to conclusions and may make a claim or two that they may not actually be able to back up. This is certainly not a big deal,
and it happens all the time in this world. IMO, there sure seem to be a lot of uptight around here who could probably stand to learn
how to relax more. 
All the best...

I just look at the statements for what they are and the inherent self-contradictions.  EMJ's actions are blatantly obvious.  If you want to believe he is sincere you are welcome to do so.  You can ignore the fact that he made specific performance claims and immediately disclaimed measurement, or that he has misrepresented his circuit, or that he told PIH to pound sand when PIH asked for specifics, or that in the circuits he has shown he does not show a credible means to measure his output.  If you still want to believe that he found a COP of 1.7 or 2.5 as he has claimed then be my guest.

If you think that bucking transformer windings is new, then you are just wrong.  Partially bucking windings have been used for decades and decades.  What EMJ presents is just a badly implemented flyback surrounded by enthusiastically expressed obfuscation.

[conradelektro]

Ok, I will go, spend many more hours trying to show yet more information diagrammatically.

@EMJunkie:

Words, theories and diagrams are good, but the most important thing missing is a "working device".

You should present a working device and measurements on this "working device".

And because you obviously want people to reproduce your result the "working device" should be sufficiently specified (which components, which core, which wire, frequency, supply Voltage).

And it does not need 70.000 words to describe the "working device".

The only very clear message from you is that you do not have a "working device" and this is the problem. Solve his problem and many will believe you.

I can even forgive that you have no working device. What I can not forgive is that you do not give an honest answer when asked about a "working device".

Greetings, Conrad

[MarkE]

Conrad is testing on the original 100% passive transformer circuit.

OK, sure, with just a transformer with the two matched secondary windings bucking, ideally there is no net voltage across them and no power transfer through them at all.  Small mismatches lead to a small amount of net voltage difference and a small amount of power transfer, just as Conrad reports.