Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[synchro1]

Scoposcopy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8Fo-WxUiNA

(I found the shorting problem in the coils, rewound the primary with better isolation, but now the L3 coil is making like an ozone generator and showing corona inside the windings. That's what I get for using used wire from a TV deflection yoke, I guess. Will have to rebuild the whole coil set with better quality wire and proper HV isolation technique.)

@TinslKoala,

Watch out for that fat moth when it flutters forth from your sow's ear!

[EMJunkie]

Hi MarkE. You see deceitful intentions, I see what is probably just some over enthusiasm and jumping the gun a bit.
I have certainly seen nothing much at all that warrants all the accusations and insults, etc.   Sometimes people may be a bit too
quick to jump to conclusions and may make a claim or two that they may not actually be able to back up. This is certainly not a big deal,
and it happens all the time in this world. IMO, there sure seem to be a lot of uptight around here who could probably stand to learn
how to relax more. 
All the best...

@Void,

Thank You!

I have been here all along, surely this fact is pie in the face for those that throw accusations!

Perhaps, those that come running, like Flies' to Sh** as soon as OU is mentioned should proceed with some prejudice or even not proceed at all in the future to these claims. Yet they still do!

The very reason I say this, is that many of those that do, don't believe it can be done anyway 

Bucking can mean net Zero on the output, conventionally. It does not have to, there is another way where it does not! No one can see this! This is the reason I use a new term, "Partnered Output Coils"!

I have said a thousand times, the E Field must add, No one has investigated this! People just Jump to conclusions with no supporting evidence so that makes them just as bad.

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-Field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E" - this is true I have been trying to explain this.

Inversely:

"Similarly, if two signals flow through each other in such a way as to give the appearance of a steady magnetic field as a result of their E-field cancelling it is easily shown using the above equations to cancel out H and C"

From the some 70,000 characters I have written, trying to bring attention to such technology, which is important mind you once understood, some here have only concentrated on only 9.

What ever those 9 characters may be, it does not make the technology less important! This Technology is still a path forward which was my point from the first post in this thread!

[MileHigh]

I have said a thousand times, the E Field must add, No one has investigated this! People just Jump to conclusions with no supporting evidence so that makes them just as bad.

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-Field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E" - this is true I have been trying to explain this.

Inversely:

"Similarly, if two signals flow through each other in such a way as to give the appearance of a steady magnetic field as a result of their E-field cancelling it is easily shown using the above equations to cancel out H and C"

Please make some kind of annotated diagram for this stuff and also a timing diagram to show us what you are talking about.  I am sure that many people want to see something tangible - please take your words and turn them into diagrams and timing diagrams.

[EMJunkie]

Please make some kind of annotated diagram for this stuff and also a timing diagram to show us what you are talking about.  I am sure that many people want to see something tangible - please take your words and turn them into diagrams and timing diagrams.

MileHigh - I have done many, many diagrams already

How about you guys see why this has been written like this, to mean what exactly, and explaining something that conventionally is Not actually Bucking Coils.

Surely it is now your turn to do some real hard Core thinking to see what has been said here.

Remember, what I have brought to this thread is not my Technology, its many hundreds of other peoples through out History that have all shared the same things.

How about you help out a bit here.

[MileHigh]

MileHigh - I have done many, many diagrams already

How about you guys see why this has been written like this, to mean what exactly, and explaining something that conventionally is Not actually Bucking Coils.

Surely it is now your turn to do some real hard Core thinking to see what has been said here.

Remember, what I have brought to this thread is not my Technology, its many hundreds of other peoples through out History that have all shared the same things.

How about you help out a bit here.

No cop-outs Chris.  If you are not capable of showing annotated configuration diagrams showing where the fields are, etc., along with an annotated timing diagram then you have nothing.  All that you have are meaningless words that you have been parroting from somewhere else.

If your statement is the "big thing" that we are not understanding but you understand it - make some diagrams and show us.  Or just admit that you can't.

We are already overloaded with meaningless claims from you that have gone nowhere.  Doing some diagrams would be very good.