Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

I was unaware that poorly performing flyback converters represented a "technology".

MarkE - I was also just as unaware that Genius EE/Technological Know all's, followed "poorly performing flyback converters" with such a dedication 

It is, however good to know that you spend most of your day and half the night here, watching, like a mother Crock watches her babies 

[MarkE]

MarkE - I was also just as unaware that Genius EE/Technological Know all's, followed "poorly performing flyback converters" with such a dedication 

It is, however good to know that you spend most of your day and half the night here, watching, like a mother Crock watches her babies 

You're antics are quite entertaining.  Though you might need to change tactics yet again to hold any followers.  Your specific COP 1.7 and 2.5 claims are at this point total fails.

[EMJunkie]

You're antics are quite entertaining.  Though you might need to change tactics yet again to hold any followers.  Your specific COP 1.7 and 2.5 claims are at this point total fails.

Followers are not my drug, its watching others achieve results that the MarkE Hollande Duell's say are impossible. That's where I get my kicks from 

So far, the most interesting explanations are:

1: Leakage Inductance
2: Noisy Environment
3: Poorly Performing Flyback Converters

and the list will continue

Still, its only Void that is experimenting with more than the one variation of the Technology I have bought to this table. Void is the one getting results here. TK even got surprising results. 0.68 + 30 Neon's as an output, Hmmm my math says something to me.

No one yet, has brought up that Stan Meyer used a Resonant Circuit! What would two SS Plates, filled with a Dielectric Liquid constitute? Stan said it all along, tune for resonance, no one has brought this up either!

It seems all are so asphyxiated on COP Claims that they are stuck to the Wall!!!

Your minds, are there for a reason!

What would Resonant Bucking Coils do?

  Chris

[MarkE]

Followers are not my drug, its watching others achieve results that the MarkE Hollande Duell's say are impossible. That's where I get my kicks from 

Then you must be very disappointed as the replications of your junk flyback circuits have not produced the COPs of 1.7 and 2.5, rather they have produced COPs of less than 25%.

So far, the most interesting explanations are:

1: Leakage Inductance
2: Noisy Environment
3: Poorly Performing Flyback Converters

LOL, leakage inductance is a feature of the construction.  The circuits are electrically noisy as they generate multi-kV voltage spikes that rise at over 10V/ns.  The circuits are demonstrated: overly complicated and low < 25% efficient flyback converters.  Those are all observations.  Stock circuit theory explains those observations.

and the list will continue

Still, its only Void that is experimenting with more than the one variation of the Technology

Poor performing flybacks are a "Technology"?

I have bought to this table. Void is the one getting results here. TK even got surprising results. 0.68 + 30 Neon's as an output, Hmmm my math says something to me.

If it what it says sounds like David Berkowitz' dog, then get help.  It is trivial to get much better efficiency by reconfiguring the circuit without the "partnered coils".

No one yet, has brought up that Stan Meyer used a Resonant Circuit! What would two SS Plates, filled with a Dielectric Liquid constitute? Stan said it all along, tune for resonance, no one has brought this up either!

LOL, well if you want to associate yourself with a dead fraud, then be my guest.  Maybe you can arrange a road trip with Mylow to visit the graves of Stan Meyer and Howard Johnson together.

It seems all are so asphyxiated on COP Claims that they are stuck to the Wall!!!

The COP 1.7 and 2.5 claims are yours and they have fallen by the wayside in the face of measured COPs of less than 25%.

Your minds, are there for a reason!

What would Resonant Bucking Coils do?

  Chris

What would Julia do?  If you haven't noticed your circuit already has resnonant ring-out.  As it is, the resonant ring-out contributes to the poor efficiency of your scheme.  There are clever circuits out there that use resonant or quasi-resonant circuits to reduce switching losses and improve efficiency.  Your junky flyback is not such a case.  Your circuits suffer from excessive:  conduction, switching, and radiation losses versus ordinary flyback circuits found in IC application notes.

What is even more hilarious is that you attempt to stigmatize me by making a false quote attribution to Charles Holland Duell.  The trouble for you is:  He never uttered the quote you attribute, nor is there any credible information that he uttered anything similar.  So, it seems you just happy attributing fantasical beliefs to other people as you are to promoting fantastical physical claims.  Your references are so bad you can't even get his name right.

[TinselKoala]

@TinselKoala,

That's coming from the "Skin Flint" that single handedly bankrupted all 1700 Radio Shacks. You failed to even so much as to wrap your "piece of crap" bucking coils primary with sufficient windings. You're the biggest bore on the forum rigged for non stop flops .

You are indeed hilarious.