Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[picowatt]

EMJ,

A few pages back, member "Magnethos" posted this link to a youtube video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDH7s3IMTtE

What would you estimate (or guesstimate) the amount of power flowing to be in just the single loop of heavy wire when the current flow indicated in that loop is 80 amps?

(Let's assume that the wire loop is made of 2-0 copper with a 2 foot circumference)

PW

[MarkE]

Once again your assumptions let you down! Look at his objective!

Read the patent MarkE!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

The patent states its intention right off the bat:  Reduce interwinding capacitance.  "The object of this invention is to reduce the capacitive effects in transformers adapted to be used for ampliying high or low frequency alternating currents. ... Figure 2 shows a circuit arrangement in which the secondary is divided into two secitons.  The mutual capacity of the turns is diagrammatically represented int he figure by dotted condensers.  The electromotive forces produced by the capacitiave coupling are indicated by dotted arrows.  If now the entire seconary is traversed from the terminal A t the termanl B the said capacitive forces are found to neutralize each other so that production of a potential difference between the terminals A-B is prevented by CAPACITIVE transmission. ... The same curvilinear or ortary directio of the two sections results in an induced magnetic flux having the same polarity in each section.  ... On the other hand, the capacitive fluxes opposite polarity, ..."

The windings are as I told you wired in series.  Figure 1 shows a secondary that is not split, and Figure 2 shows a split secondary.  You really ought to try harder to understand your own references.

[tinman]

EMJ,

A few pages back, member "Magnethos" posted this link to a youtube video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDH7s3IMTtE

What would you estimate (or guesstimate) the amount of power flowing to be in just the single loop of heavy wire when the current flow indicated in that loop is 80 amps?

(Let's assume that the wire loop is made of 2-0 copper with a 2 foot circumference)

PW

Lets make it a meter loop(1 meter of wire in a loop) ,so as it makes things easier to calculate.
1m of 2 gauge copper rod(cant really call it wire at that gauge) has a resistance of .000513ohms. As it is in a loop,the resistance would be 1/4 of this,which would be .000128 ohms.or .128 milliohms. So we would have about 820mW of power flowing through the rod/wire at 80 amps.

Now let me ask you this PW.
If the copper rod/wire was replaced with steel rod/wire of the same size,would the current flowing through the loop still be the same?.

[Magnethos]

I've been reading part of this thread. I posted that video because I found it very interesting. As you know, in the Barbosa-Leal system, there is also a high amperage in the closed wire that is wound in the toroid core. So the video link I posted is also the same effect but replacing the toroid core with a microwave oven transformer.

In other thread http://overunity.com/15820/extracting-energy-from-a-vector-potential/msg453172/#new
I suggested to use 'Rogowski coils' to extract energy from that closed loop.

Speaking with other user from this forum, he said me that in the video-link a poland guy posted a comment (see picture Ismael342-comments below). I don't fully understand what the polish guy exactly means, but I think I understan him partially.

Well, I've had the idea of using a 'differentiator'. I've invented that word, but I mean to use a special kind of transformer (inverter) to convert single wire energy (like we've in the closed loop wire), to 2 wire energy. Instead using the Avramenko plug, there is another solution: Michael Bank inverter. See second picture attachment.

The polish guy exactly says: "special binary system WITH TWO TRANSFORMERS".
The only thing I know as special binary system with two transformers is the Michael Bank system.

[Magnethos]

You've to think that the single wire is exactly the same as a closed wire, because in both cases there is only 1 wire. The only difference is that in one case the wire is straight and in the other case the wire is closed in a loop, circular fashion. But they're both one wire.

I think that in the closed loop there is what Michael Bank calls 'equipotential currents' that must be decombined using the Bank's inverter to get 2 wires energy (classic energy).

To obtain 2 wires energy from 1 wire energy it's needed 2 transformers. The comment in youtube from the polish guy also talks about using 2 transformers. Can be him refering to a similar (or even the same) system as Bank?

Screenshot - 02238.jpg is from the author Michael Bank.
Page 9 of his last powerpoint presentation at this date.