Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Spilled Fluids]

Mark.E
A laser beam.  Once again you fail.

   MarkE: Please direct me to where you got the idea that a laser beam has voltage and no electrons.
Or can you prove that this is so. Can you provide proof of an electron, or the lack of them? Empirical proof.
  I thought that light was composed of photons, not electrons, or voltage. Little did I know.
  Does Sun light have voltage too, and no electrons, as well.
  How can you be sure? Who can we trust,  NASA perhaps??? Your old school teacher, maybe.
   Most everything that NASA has done and said, has been lies. 

   There are no OU prizes being awarded.  Must mean that there are no self running devices, even.
I've never seen one. Have you?  They must not exist then, or someone would have won the prize.
   Same thing with ghosts,and spirits,  just peoples imagination. No proof. Just BS. 
  Telepathy, no not that as well. No proof.
  God must be a story as well then. No proof.  Show me God, then I'll believe it.

Swedish scientists have actually photographed electrons...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofp-OHIq6Wo

I don't know about ghosts, spirits, telepathy or any other paranormal activities although I am skeptical.

As for god, well that is just a superstitious construct made up by ancient priests as a way to control the masses.
Bibles, korans, torahs or any other 'sacred' tomes are all written by men and for the same purposes.; mostly political as in the case of the christian bible.

[Spilled Fluids]

thanks tinman
hopefully people will be able to reproduce it

To what end? There are already good generators with 95% efficiency or better. There are no generators capable of producing more output than is input and there never will be in this universe.
If this generator can produce output at 95% or better and at a lower cost of construction then it may be marketable and maybe even make tinman some coin. But first he will have to shield the unit so it doesn't broddcast in regulated frequency bands.

[tinman]

Oops! I hit too close to home didn't I? No problem, I understand how the authorities can be when some one intrudes into frequency bands they are not licensed to use. Lesson learned or are you going to continue with the charade?



Only people who know they are on shaky ground resort to name calling and vulgarities like you are doing; it says a lot about you and your credibility.

And yet it was you that came in with guns blazing,calling me a liar.Your kind is well known in these forum's. First you start to insult people(without any knowledge of past tense),and then turn it all around to make them sound like the bad guy-->nice try,but epic fail.

Post some of your work here,so as we may judge you as you have judged some of us.
My guess is you wont,as you have nothing to show to back up your !big! words of wisdom.

I am no guru, no expert or authority but I have done enough of my own experiments( a couple of people here know of them) to be completely satisfied that OU is nothing more than a pipe dream of those who would delude themselves and any other gullible people willing to listen.

Time to save face SF.
Please re post the post where i stated that i have an OU device.
Also note that your inadequate experiments are in no way any reference to what is possible and what is not.

OU is nothing more than a pipe dream of those who would delude themselves and any other gullible people willing to listen.

Delusion lies within those that believe that we know all there is to know<--you are one of these people.

[MarkE]

Mark.E
A laser beam.  Once again you fail.

A laser beam is a moving E/M wavefront.  It seems it is you who need to dust off the books.

   MarkE: Please direct me to where you got the idea that a laser beam has voltage and no electrons.

See above.

Or can you prove that this is so. Can you provide proof of an electron, or the lack of them? Empirical proof.

Given the thousands upon thousands of laser references you should not have any any problem locating references on the Transverse Electromagnetic Mode: TEM mode of laser propagation.

  I thought that light was composed of photons, not electrons, or voltage. Little did I know.

That's right photons and not electrons.  And yet it is a propagating electromagnetic wave front.  And that is the point.

  Does Sun light have voltage too, and no electrons, as well.

Visible light and non-visible E/M radiation from the sun is carried by photons dude.

  How can you be sure? Who can we trust,  NASA perhaps??? Your old school teacher, maybe.
   Most everything that NASA has done and said, has been lies. 

LOL, believe any kind of nonsense that you want.

   There are no OU prizes being awarded.  Must mean that there are no self running devices, even.
I've never seen one. Have you?  They must not exist then, or someone would have won the prize.

It certainly raises question as to why if someone has one that works that they have not made themselves fantastically rich and powerful with such a device.

   Same thing with ghosts,and spirits,  just peoples imagination. No proof. Just BS. 

Got objective evidence?

  Telepathy, no not that as well. No proof.

Got objective evidence?

  God must be a story as well then. No proof.  Show me God, then I'll believe it.

If you want to believe in sky people screwing with your life for their amusement and vanity, you are free to do so.  Are these sky people kind and loving, or are they vain, arbitrary, and hateful?  Do they pick favorites and tell those favorites that they are privileged to: cheat, , and murder their fellow humans?  Is your distrust of NASA due to manned and unmanned spacecraft alike not bumping into these sky people?

[MarkE]

Aah, no, there is no attempt to misrepresent anything. If I were attempting to misrepresent then I wouldn't have posted the link to the full explanation.

LOL, yet you truncated the sentence completely changing its meaning:  FAIL.

It is you who is attempting to misrepresent as I see it. But que sera, I'm interested in the subject matter here, not all the ad hominem that is freely flowing between yourself and others. Nor am I interested in your attempt to define only the part of a sentence which you deem applicable while ignoring the rest. Simply highlighting one part changes nothing. I can do that too.

"Voltage is a representation of the electric potential energy per unit charge."

Here is the full entry, with some more highlighting.

Definition:Voltage is a representation of the electric potential energy per unit charge. If a unit of electrical charge were placed in a location, the voltage indicates the potential energy of it at that point. In other words, it is a measurement of the energy contained within an electric field, or an electric circuit, at a given point.

Cheers

Yep, that is what the whole thing says.  And you either do not comprehend, or simply choose to ignore what you have quoted.  See the "of it at that point"  the "it" being the charge?  If you want to put on blinders you are free to do so.