Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Spilled Fluids]

And yet it was you that came in with guns blazing,calling me a liar.Your kind is well known in these forum's. First you start to insult people(without any knowledge of past tense),and then turn it all around to make them sound like the bad guy-->nice try,but epic fail.

Post some of your work here,so as we may judge you as you have judged some of us.
My guess is you wont,as you have nothing to show to back up your !big! words of wisdom.

Time to save face SF.
Please re post the post where i stated that i have an OU device.
Also note that your inadequate experiments are in no way any reference to what is possible and what is not.

Delusion lies within those that believe that we know all there is to know<--you are one of these people.

This is the OverUNity forum so by extension when you post your device or ideas here they are automatically being put forward as OU. I never said you said your device was OU; what I did say is that OU is not possible.

Posting any of my experiments here would serve no purpose since they did not produce over unity. Besides, I'm not the one making any claims; now who is turning things around? Smooth move.
If you really care you can search them out on R-G.

I am probably one of the last people that think they know everything so I'm not the deluded one here or anywhere.

In closing there is only one thing to say; post up or shut up. Either way you will be shown for what you are; completely mistaken or an outright fraud.

[hoptoad]

A laser beam is a moving E/M wavefront.
snip...

So now you are trying to conflate a massless electromagnetic wavefront with an actual electron particle which has mass. Your ability to define things your own way seems to know no bounds.
Personally I'll stick with accepted physics definitions of what constitutes an electron and what constitutes an electromagnetic wave.

[Spilled Fluids]

So now you are trying to conflate a massless electromagnetic wavefront with an actual electron particle which has mass. Your ability to define things your own way seems to know no bounds.
Personally I'll stick with accepted physics definitions of what constitutes an electron and what constitutes an electromagnetic wave.

More remedial reading and comprehension courses required here.

I do not see any of what you have imagined in anything Mark wrote. Try passing it through a comprehension app and see if you understand then.

[tinman]

To what end? There are already good generators with 95% efficiency or better. There are no generators capable of producing more output than is input and there never will be in this universe.

Such a small mind-one that has a single line of thinking.
ALL generators are 100% efficient-->your own laws of thermodynamics say this is true. Your tunnel vision is what sends people off in the wrong direction. You see only 1 energy output from a given input-->another epic fail on your behalf.

If this generator can produce output at 95% or better and at a lower cost of construction then it may be marketable and maybe even make tinman some coin. But first he will have to shield the unit so it doesn't broddcast in regulated frequency bands.

Oh dear-another mishap. What is a broddcast?. Seems we both need some remedial reading/writing classes. Fancy having a stab at some ones writing skills when making the very same mistakes lol.
That's broadcast by the way
1.transmit (a programme or some information) by radio or television.
2.scatter (seeds) by hand or machine rather than placing in drills or rows.

noun
a radio or television programme or transmission.

adjective
relating to radio or television programmes.

adverb
by scattering.

And by the way. Could you also re post the post where i(yes,me) said anything about this broadcasting of radio waves.
Once again,your inability to read has put you in another pickle.
Your starting to make yourself look bad.

[MarkE]

Lots of people seem to be upset that tinman has not exposed more than what he has.  I am not one of those people.  He has largely done what he promised to do.  He offers a curious presentation that appears to be at odds with science that has been proven countless times.  I thank him for the demonstration. But I have no expectation that the demonstrations threaten known physics.  If we all start flying around in vehicles powered by Mr. Tinman power generators then my expectations will be proven wrong.  If nothing comes of it, then my expectations will be fulfilled.