Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[tinman]

Brad:

Now the "invisible" parasitic capacitances and inductances become "visible."  The circuit that you have your scope probes attached to is literally a different circuit than the circuit on paper, and therefore the power computation is invalid.

Chances are if you touch any part of the circuit with the tip of your finger you will see a noticeable change in the waveforms.  You may even see slight changes in the waveforms just by approaching the circuit with your hand but not touching it.

Almost any circuit will do things like this when you drive them at very high frequencies.  The invisible capacitors and inductors come out of the woodwork and start to affect everything.  So no negative resistance in sight.

The suggestion is to pick a reasonable frequency like 500 Hz or 1 KHz and do most of your testing at that much lower frequency.

MileHigh

Agreed on all accounts.

[shylo]

It's funny, how everytime  the offshoots of misdirection arise.
Steer away from the subject at hand , and there have been many.
People that think , won't forget, people that only listen ,it will just slip on by.

Tinnman, your work is top notch.
The next step is to try 2 inner cores.
What happens if you can build a xfrmr with multiple inner cores
Multiple interactions , is there any math that can even calculate it, I doubt it.
The formula's are constantly changing.
One question ; When you potted the innner core , Did you use magnets on the outside of the core form to align the domains?
Or did it just settle to the inherent magnetic field?
Or was it only the outside core that was potted?
Thank-you for all your work.
artv

[Dog-One]

A little something for you gurus with 3D Printers:
https://www.lulzbot.com/products/magnetic-iron-pla-3mm-filament-500g-reel-proto-pasta

Simply print your cores, wind your mag-wire and test.  No need to fuss with molds and such.
And the beauty in doing this is you can change your core density simply by adjusting your fill pattern/percentage.
Want to do multiply inner cores like shylo suggests?  No problem.

If you don't already have a 3D Printer, may I suggest one of these for starters:
https://www.lulzbot.com/products/lulzbot-mini-3d-printer

Cheers and good luck at all!

[MileHigh]

Brad:

You have to understand that when you are discussing something then two viewpoints mean a two way street for both viewpoints.  You allege that I am trying to force my view on you.  But if you object to what I say then you are trying to force your view onto me.  Don't you get that?

Look, you said, "Flux velocity through the secondary exceeds that of what the primary projects."  That is nonsense.  There is just a B field, and magnetic flux density and total magnetic flux, and all of the coupling effects are determined by the rate of change of magnetic flux with respect to time.

You get upset when I say that and accuse me of forcing my opinion on you?   But if you object to what I say then you are forcing your opinion on me.  Do you see?  Beyond that good luck finding a credible source about magnetism that talks about "flux velocity."  It seems you are making up your own definitions on the fly.  That has severe limitations.

You are going to go ahead and ignore some of the stuff that I say, that's your prerogative.  But like I said before, when all is said and done, if you are wrong after all of your testing is done and the real experts around here give you guidance and suggestions that you listen to, then state your conclusions and account for your theories and state if they were right or wrong.  If not you get people saying things like, "The 'radiant energy spike' is voltage with almost no measurable current."  And after all this time I am pretty sure that you know that by definition the "radiant energy spike" is a pulse of current at a certain voltage.  That's the kind of B.S. that we all want to avoid.

So many here believe that a permanent magnet cannot do useful work-so let me ask you these questions
1--> Is work required to align the magnetic domains within a piece of iron?
2-->If the magnetic domains within a given material(e.g 316 S/S)do not,will not align,will that material be attracted to a magnetic field.

For starters, I gave you a full explanation on another thread how you are being deceived by your measurements when you add a magnet to a system and see improved performance.  A permanent magnet cannot do useful work.

To answer your questions:

1.  Yes, of course work is required.
2.  There is no easy answer to that question in generic sense.  For example 316 stainless steel may not be attracted by a magnet, but there may be a small amount of material in the alloy that does indeed respond to magnetic fields and so there may be a weak magnetic attraction with very strong magnetic fields.  I am just taking a guess and not looking anything up.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Webby1:

Look at the first part of my previous posting and let it sink in.

MileHigh