Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 140 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Brad:

As many have already mentioned, you ventured into high frequency territory out of curiosity and saw the usual effects taking place.  Now the "invisible" parasitic capacitances and inductances become "visible."  The circuit that you have your scope probes attached to is literally a different circuit than the circuit on paper, and therefore the power computation is invalid.

Chances are if you touch any part of the circuit with the tip of your finger you will see a noticeable change in the waveforms.  You may even see slight changes in the waveforms just by approaching the circuit with your hand but not touching it.

Almost any circuit will do things like this when you drive them at very high frequencies.  The invisible capacitors and inductors come out of the woodwork and start to affect everything.  So no negative resistance in sight.

The suggestion is to pick a reasonable frequency like 500 Hz or 1 KHz and do most of your testing at that much lower frequency.

MileHigh

MileHigh

Brad:

QuoteI will continue to provide and post results here-as long as what i believe is not dismissed by those that !think! we know all there is to know. If some one can tell me exactly what the magnetic force actually is,then i will take what you have to say as gospel,but until then my thoughts will be mine until i decide otherwise.

You can't have any censorship on thought here.  Sometimes you have to roll with the punches.  You have talked nonsense about magnetic fields and I have called you on it.  You may not like it but if you want to back up your claims with experimental results that definitively and unambiguously prove your theories, then go for it.  Do the experiments on your device, and possibly other devices, that prove your controversial theories if you can.

You can't expect people to roll over like lap dogs just because you have an idea and want to promote it.  I tried in all sincerity to help you while many people stood by mute and listened.  Then you talked stuff that didn't make any sense and I called you on it and all of a sudden I am the bad guy.  Like I said, we all have to roll with the punches sometimes, and that includes me as well as you.  When I think back to the many times I have tried to help people, and then I disagree with them on some technical point and then all of a sudden I am the bad guy.  They forget that I am trying to help someone and instead demonize me.  It's ridiculous.

Nobody is saying that Picowatt or Poynt or others know everything.  That's playing Straw Man and putting words in other people's mouths.  Likewise, you can't say exactly what a magnetic field is either, so you have no license to throw that tired old cliche around.

So if you say stuff that makes no sense, then I am going to say it.  You can disagree and keep on testing and just roll with it.  However, when you are finished testing and all is said and done, if you don't find any evidence to back up your controversial claims then own up to it and admit that you found no evidence to back up your claims.  If you do find evidence then state that also.  You have to realize that we are not dealing with impressionistic art here where one person sees a blue-green cloud and another person sees a green-blue tree in the same painting.  This is the SCIENCE of electronics and physics, and you will have won the lotto if you think that you have uncovered something new and previously undiscovered when you test a magnetic circuit.  That is the reality.

You can agree to disagree with me or others if myself or someone else calls you on something that you say that is controversial.  But if you do that then you have to be accountable to yourself and the readers when all is said and done and the testing and experimenting is over.   Likewise, I or someone else would do the same thing if a controversial statement you make turns out to be true.

MileHigh

MagnaProp

Here is yet another bungling snake oil salesman that liked to make up stuff and labeled a heretic as he dared to question "known" phenomenon. Not the worst company to be in.

Sometimes you have to be willing to step outside the box for a while to get a new perspective on things before you step back in.

digitalindustry

Quote from: MagnaProp on October 29, 2015, 01:37:04 AM
Here is yet another bungling snake oil salesman that liked to make up stuff and labeled a heretic as he dared to question "known" phenomenon. Not the worst company to be in.

and the company you are in is 'Meatpuppet' ?

I'm not 100% sure who's better.

you've got a good life to look forward to as long as someone keeps holding your little meatpuppet strings.

i always ask it's interesting that it's so important to some people that others do not experiment ha ha

think about it, it keeps you pathetic parasites in a job.

: D

tinman

Quote from: MileHigh on October 29, 2015, 12:30:45 AM
Brad:


MileHigh

QuoteYou can't have any censorship on thought here.

No,but i can choose as to what i wish to believe.

QuoteYou have talked nonsense about magnetic fields and I have called you on it.

You have done no such thing. In fact,i believe it was me that called you out on one of your claims about magnetic field strengths and coil arrangements some time back,and i backed it up with actual experiments.

QuoteSometimes you have to roll with the punches.

As do you MH.

QuoteYou may not like it but if you want to back up your claims with experimental results that definitively and unambiguously prove your theories, then go for it.  Do the experiments on your device, and possibly other devices, that prove your controversial theories if you can.

I think those that no not what it is they are dealing with, are the ones that present controversy when they dismiss others thoughts.

QuoteYou can't expect people to roll over like lap dogs just because you have an idea and want to promote it.

What i expect is that everyone has a mind of there own,and there thoughts are not governed by what others believe to be true. What you are doing MH is trying to force others to believe in what you believe in,when you dont know what it is you are believing in.

QuoteI tried in all sincerity to help you while many people stood by mute and listened.  Then you talked stuff that didn't make any sense and I called you on it and all of a sudden I am the bad guy.

Once again MH,you did not call me on any thing.

QuoteLike I said, we all have to roll with the punches sometimes, and that includes me as well as you.  When I think back to the many times I have tried to help people, and then I disagree with them on some technical point and then all of a sudden I am the bad guy.  They forget that I am trying to help someone and instead demonize me.  It's ridiculous.

MH-i will not, nor have not demonized you for what you believe to be correct.
I only expect the same back.

QuoteNobody is saying that Picowatt or Poynt or others know everything.  That's playing Straw Man and putting words in other people's mouths.  Likewise, you can't say exactly what a magnetic field is either, so you have no license to throw that tired old cliche around.

And yet you seem to think you are correct,and i wrong. How can one judge others MH when that one dose not know what they are dealing with?. Knowing how to construct devices around an effect in no way means that you fully know or understand what that effect is.

QuoteYou can agree to disagree with me or others if myself or someone else calls you on something that you say that is controversial.  But if you do that then you have to be accountable to yourself and the readers when all is said and done and the testing and experimenting is over.   Likewise, I or someone else would do the same thing if a controversial statement you make turns out to be true.

Ok,i will make this as clear as i can MH. It is painfully obvious that both science and physics has something wrong,as if they had it right,then we would know what the magnetic force actually is. Because this known is missing and an unknown,then both science and physics dose !NOT! have all the answers. Your argument is that because we can build devices that work in,around,and with magnetic fields,then we are full bottles on the subject.

So many here believe that a permanent magnet cannot do useful work-so let me ask you these questions
1--> Is work required to align the magnetic domains within a piece of iron?
2-->If the magnetic domains within a given material(e.g 316 S/S)do not,will not align,will that material be attracted to a magnetic field.