Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[steadyfield]

Hi, All
I found this article to be interesting. It contains bucking coils for input or output. And there is another winding L3 for short pulses modulation. It says it uses parametric method. The link is here and I hope it helps somehow.

http://gorchilin.com/articles/experiment/parametric?lang=en

Regards,
Steadyfield

[Meta]

In properly wound coils (2) you will have a reading of 0, which is what you want.

You may also wind both bucking coils on one spool. Its called a Caduceus Coil.

You are very close to finding the gravitic, now.

[l0stf0x]

@steadyfield, Thank you for that circuit! it may give ideas!

@ Wistiti
I need to do more to clear up what is going on.. I realized that the earth connection acts funny in other coils as well.. So this needs work first. But ones you make the transformer then you can experiment by your self. After all the main work that I have done until now was only at the transformer. The earth combining was just an idea out of the schedule.

So lets forget the -0.05A at the moment and concentrate at the 0.13A from 0.23A thats a gain 43% in test1 which is not bad at all as a start.. and its clear and steady and repeatable.

I include a disassemble video showing how its made.. its very simple actually. All you need is the cores from 3 flybacks from old tvs.

I had 3 sizes of them, but 2 of them are not the same with their pairs. Any way play with the sizes if you can.

But I suggest the larger core to be placed on the side without primary, only secondaries will use it
The other 2 smaller cores will have the primaries each.

Why we use 3 cores? It looks like that the secondaries need their own core and primaries also. I never had so good results using 1 or 2 cores (flux conflict). (Actually I got a better core/coil arrangement in my mind which I will build next). But for now, the known setup is cheaper, easier, faster to replicate, and with good results.

The coils either primaries or secondaries may need to be flipped over for the circuit to work.
You may also need to swap cables of primaries too.

The magnet works only if you stick it the right orientation/polarity on the one particular primary's core only (it will not work on the other primary's core, you will find out playing... you will find the way by looking at current reading as you play with it).

You will get different gain if you use different size half cores. Test what you have. In test1 I used this little half core to close the loop at the one primary's core. I had worst results with bigger size. So this need testing.

My primaries coils are taken from small mains transformers.. are different in sizes as you can see at the video but I balance their inductance before i tape them so to be magnetically equal.

As you see at the video the extra coil is not connected to anywhere but its position on core have role.
If you don't want to use the extra coil... just close the loop of core with the ferrite and use the small half ferrite (as in test1 video) at the one primary... the one with no magnet on its core.

The secondaries are wounded on 3 batteries as I show in video.. 75 turns each as I remember and can be connected either in series or in parallel with the load. In my case its in series. Add more turns if you can. My next setup will have much more turns. You may raise the output voltage but you raise the gain effect as well. At least that is what I understand so far on that part. Secondaries has to be strong electromagnets too to raise the gain. Unfortunately all limits in coils sizes depends from the core sizes.

The purpose of having all coils and cores separate and mobile is for easier moving and testing.

That's all at the moment...

Here a helping drawing and a disassemble Video.

https://youtu.be/rnZfULccP9Y

[EMJunkie]

To Everyone,

It is with the deepest sorrow that I have to announce the sudden and unexpected Death of John Bedini today (Saturday, November 5, 2016). Those of us who knew him well are without words at this time. Anyone who would like to leave a comment here about this truly brilliant and generous Soul, please do.

Peter Lindemann

A Tribute to John Bedini:

I never met John Bedini, although it feels like I did. We exchanged a few E-Mails many years back. In my research and investigations into the Floyd Sweet VTA, it felt like I got to know him. I am in shock, John was a man that influenced more human beings than any other I know. John, you're an Inspiration to all who knew you and know of your work.

Thank You for all you have done!


Respectfully,


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

@L0stf0x,

Fantastic Work!!!

Thanks for sharing and showing how easy this really is! Building and Fiddling, making observations, simple ones, nothing needs to be complicated and you have done an excellent job at showing this! Thank You!!!

Your observations are correct, re the Magnet and adding energy to the System:

To provide a means of capturing more incoherent quanta to complement the existing integrated flux densities and BH_c or energy product. More feedback in the form of volt-ampere product at a cos of = 1 or unity of watts in the form of D.C. potential.

...

The flux produced by the moving charges comprising the load current goes through zero, thus the complimentary flux, that is integrated with the coherent flux, aiding the cross flux between the attracting magnets.

Floyd Sweet gave us a very good analogy regarding this phenomena:

How does the Space Flux Coupled Alternator appear to operate beyond unity? An approximate analogy, not by any means perfect, is as follows:

Picture a side-wheel paddle steam boat making its way down stream in the same direction as a fairly strong tidal flow. Assume the steam engine to be highly efficient, say 80%. Now assume the engine to be working at this efficiency and that the tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship. The acceleration increases to a point where the horsepower increases beyond that equivalent energy consumed by the engine. If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity. This is hypothetical. As the momentum of the tide relates only to the mass of the steamboat's displacement of the medium, water. Actually if the forward momentum of the tide was able to relate only to the paddle wheel the forward or positive force would tend to force the wheel to turn in the opposite or negative direction.

Then in the hypothetical case, the force of the tide on the mass of the ship would equal the force acting on the paddle wheel and the ship would be motionless. In order to move in the forward direction, the engine would need to overcome the negative force of the tide on the wheel. Little engine HP would be needed, as it would integrate with the positive flow of the tide, acting on the displacement mass of the ship. The above is not achievable in practice, as the only way the tide could relate to the paddle wheel in such a manner, the mass of the ship would have to be completely out of the water and only the wheel within the flow of the tide would turn, as the momentum of the flow of the tide would not be in effect. This is reactive power – no work is done. The wheel turns but the ship is motionless. Conversely, if this were a possibility, then a ship moving against a strong tide, would be able to traverse a river without either engine of sail, by means of the force of a moving mass of water against the wheel paddles. As stated, the force of the mass of water flowing against the displacement mass of the ship predominantly opposes the positive motion of the ship. The analogy though far from perfect, suggests that if one were not aware of the visible force acting on the movement of the ship, at times, assuming all parameters were measurable, the indication might be that the engine was capable of greater than unity efficiency.

The Flux from the Permanent Magnet does Integrate with the Coils we are working with as is mentioned. This inturn increases the Output, as Floyd Sweet puts it: "thus the complimentary flux, that is integrated with the coherent flux, aiding the cross flux between the attracting magnets".

You have shown this to the world, in your experiment's, well done!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org