Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Jeg]

pls read again my above post as i added a ps before reading your answer

[EMJunkie]

Dear EmJunkie, do you mean to bring them closer or more far between each other?

i will post a pic in a few hours..
Tnks

ps. Ah i've got what you mean. I have made this inter connection change, and when i shortcuted the output my consumption climbed up to 6A!!! (If i didn't make a silly mistake as i was in a hurry there is a lot of difference in the consumption between the two connection modes..)

@Jeg and ALL

This is EXCELENT Jeg! You have bought up a Very good point!

I covered in my pdf document: http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

"The point here is that Placement of coils is important, what a Coil sees as a result of its placement can change the entire operation of the device. Not only the placement but also the direction of turns is important if it is placed on the same core as the input coil. Turn Direction is the difference between a Dead Short in the device and not shorting the device and accessing another effect that some may not have seen before."

So, you've seen one of the issues that some will definitely face! I am very happy you have got there and can see what's going on! Youre seeing a Dead Short! This takes some thinking about.

Can you tell me why you're seeing this?

This is what we would normally see in a conventional Transformer!

Why? Think A Vector Potential!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[Jeg]

Can you tell me why you're seeing this?

This is what we would normally see in a conventional Transformer!

Why? Think A Vector Potential!
   

Ok. What happens here is already explained by you. There is no opposition from secondary side at the development of a magnetic field inside the core while feeding the primary. Each one of the two output coils opposes to a magnetic change of its opposite partner and so the magnetization of the core is freely and steady without dragging.
What i still can not visualize is to how this A vector is evolving in to our arrangement. And how it is possible to feed a load with an appropriate voltage the same time that there is almost no inductance at secondary side.

tnks     

[EMJunkie]

Ok. What happens here is already explained by you. There is no opposition from secondary side at the development of a magnetic field inside the core while feeding the primary.

Yes, true, I have been through this. Exactly! (Need to see your coils to verify!) Each Partnered Output Coil is seeing a Change in Time from the Input Coil, this change, A Vector Potential is sweeping over each Coil in Time! The Electric Fields of each Coil are present, this can be seen in the Dead Short!

The Problem: Each Partnered Output Coil is not configured so each Magnetic Field Cancel!

Each one of the two output coils opposes to a magnetic change of its opposite partner and so the magnetization of the core is freely and steady without dragging.
What i still can not visualize is to how this A vector is evolving in to our arrangement. And how it is possible to feed a load with an appropriate voltage the same time that there is almost no inductance at secondary side.

tnks     

I think I understand here, yes the Solution is for Magnetic Cancelation! Apply the right Hand Rule to each Coil, relative to the Core!

You should be able to short the Partnered Output Coils and see no shift in input Current due to this Magnetic Fields Cancelling!

Again, I quote Floyd Sweet:

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E. It is a simple matter using the equations E/H √ue and c = 1/√ue for a team wave to get rid of H and C and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field"

Please post a picture first! But it sounds like you need to remove one Coil and rewind in the opposite direction to the first. Or, alternatively, space the Core Material between the two Partnered Output Coils by around 1-2 millimetres or possibly a little more. EG: Gap the Core

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[EMJunkie]

What i still can not visualize is to how this A vector is evolving in to our arrangement. And how it is possible to feed a load with an appropriate voltage the same time that there is almost no inductance at secondary side.   

@Jeg,

Lets start at the start, imagine 2 Coils, a Primary and a Secondary, standard Transformer type arrangement....

Input supply's Voltage and a Current to the Terminals of the Primary Coil.

A Load is applied to the Output (Secondary Coil)

The Load draws a Current from the already Separated Charge Carriers!

A Flowing Current constitutes a Magnetic Field!

The Secondary's Magnetic Field Vector (Arrow Direction) is in the opposite Direction to the Primary Magnetic Field!

IMPORTANT: This Magnetic Field is Still a Magnetic Field Changing in Time! It could be considered ANOTHER Primary Magnetic Field!

Now we introduce the second Coil in our Partnered Output Coils, this Secondary Coil will see the same change in time of the Magnetic Field (From the Secondary)

This also induces Charge Separation in this Coil, drawing Current from the already Separated Charge Carriers will again constitute a Magnetic Field that will oppose the Secondary, but will re-in-force the Primary!

Please watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-V1z2TdQJA

This video shows the above description, but also shows animations at the same time!

Sorry, am a bit tired, been a long day. Hope this makes sense!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!