Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

It's certainly obvious to me.

AC vs DC coupled scope channels. -- EMJunkie is wrong.
"Decoupling" capacitor.-- EMJunkie is wrong.
"In Phase" when actually 180 degrees out-of-phase.-- EMJunkie is wrong.
1.7 OU without any evidence. -- EMJunkie is wrong.
Insults delivered to Bill, MarkE and anyone else who dares to ask for real evidence for the COP claim. -- EMJunkie is wrong.

@TinselKoala, MarkE and Bill

You have been asked Nicely to leave the thread - Yet you still visit and post laughable cynical Non-Sense!

Why is it that you wont leave? You keep coming back, reading and posting to this thread?

I really wouldn't mind, but the problem is, that youre filling this thread with Mindless Non Backed-Up Piffle that most Everyone can see right through! 

Besides, TinselKoala, you have lied at least twice in your post and anyone here reading will see this!

Please, if you don't like this thread, Please Leave - I ask you agiain Nicely!

Or is it that you three have a Paid Job to do here? Mudding Waters maybe?

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[Pirate88179]

@TinselKoala, MarkE and Bill

You have been asked Nicely to leave the thread - Yet you still visit and post laughable cynical Non-Sense!

Why is it that you wont leave? You keep coming back, reading and posting to this thread?

I really wouldn't mind, but the problem is, that youre filling this thread with Mindless Non Backed-Up Piffle that most Everyone can see right through! 

Besides, TinselKoala, you have lied at least twice in your post and anyone here reading will see this!

Please, if you don't like this thread, Please Leave - I ask you agiain Nicely!

Or is it that you three have a Paid Job to do here? Mudding Waters maybe?

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

Ah, the old "Paid Shill" ploy is being used.  This happens when someone has no leg left to stand on.  Typical and, predictable.

The only muddying of the waters going on here is this entire thread.  Of course you would ask anyone that knows better to leave and stop posting as it would detract from your fantasy pseudo-science explanations that some here are actually believing.

I have been asked to leave nicer places than this.  But, usually when that happens, it is being asked by someone that actually knows what he/she is talking about.

Bill

PS  Please post to us where TK has ever "lied" as you have claimed.  I have been on this forum for many, many years and I can not seem to recall where TK has ever "lied" about anything.   You said he has done this 2 times so, this should be easy for you to at least post one of his "lies".

[propellanttech]

I'm a new guy here, but have done a lot of research on the different circuitry contain in these forums (not just this thread).

With that said, I will admit I have done no testing of my own. This is due to time and money constraints in the past, but is changing soon.

I do have a question aimed at EMJ:  Are the coils wound orthocyclic, one left hand, one right hand , and one to match a direction with less wire/bigger AWG to be the "drive" coil?

Orthocyclic to me is defined as: one layer wound (in this example moving to the left) and the following layer is wound back to the original starting point(for this example to the right),this would be stated as two layers and how ever many turns that have occurred. This cycle repeats until all layers and number of turns required are completed. A reverse othocyclic coil would be, in this example, started on the left and be moving to the right. These are only examples in this instance. A coil can be wound any direction, but the reverse would start on the opposite side.

Thanks,

James

[EMJunkie]

Bill,

Ah, the old "Paid Shill" ploy is being used.  This happens when someone has no leg left to stand on.  Typical and, predictable.

The only muddying of the waters going on here is this entire thread.  Of course you would ask anyone that knows better to leave and stop posting as it would detract from your fantasy pseudo-science explanations that some here are actually believing.

I have been asked to leave nicer places than this.  But, usually when that happens, it is being asked by someone that actually knows what he/she is talking about.

Bill

PS  Please post to us where TK has ever "lied" as you have claimed.  I have been on this forum for many, many years and I can not seem to recall where TK has ever "lied" about anything.   You said he has done this 2 times so, this should be easy for you to at least post one of his "lies".

"In Phase" when actually 180 degrees out-of-phase.-- EMJunkie is wrong.
1.7 OU without any evidence. -- EMJunkie is wrong.

Both are Lies!

1: I never said anything about the Input being in Phase - TK Lie!
2: I tried to provide some information but Ignorance and Arrogance got in the way! I ended the exchange - TK Lie!

Bill - Please leave the thread! I can sense you're not a bad bloke, just looking for something you're not sure of.

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[MileHigh]

Chris:

My ulterior motive in requesting that people do good replications is then you will have to face the hard data generated by the real experiments.  I am assuming that you would then ask the replicators to make some tweaks but the tweaks won't help that much.

Imagine five people try and get under unity results.  Then you are motivated to get your setup out of the box and do your own tests.  We will imagine for the sake of argument that someone spots a flaw in your test and measurement setup and once corrected, your results are similar to the others.

You made reference to a friend of yours getting over unity in his or her experiment.  Then it's kind of like we are in "Magic Mushroom Land" where free energy is just sprouting up like mushrooms in a damp wet bog.  The problem is that we are not in the bog or in Oz or Kansas - it's just Real Time Reality all the time!

On another note, it's just impossible for something like this to have gone unnoticed.  If it was true you would have commercial-scale magic transformer power production facilities right now, along with fridge-sized "home power boxes."  It's almost metaphysically impossible for what you are suggesting to have gone unnoticed.  So there is that ignorance-arrogance angle at play that most people don't want to think about or acknowledge.

Beyond that, for your COP 1.7 claim, did you take it further than just reporting more power out than power in?  You have an AC waveform on the input an an AC waveform on the output.  In theory you should be able to point to your scope trace and say, "this part of the output waveform is where the free energy manifests itself.  "Strangely enough" that is never done.

Ultimately I would hope that this all can become a positive learning experience for you and for the others following the thread.  Real Life in Real Time is going to show you the truth.  Then you can go back to transformer theory in the books and see how they got it right.

Seriously, there is a kind of philosophical angle to consider here.  How do I fit into the big picture and does what I do stand out and break new ground or am I just going through the learning steps of life?  Am I being too arrogant and prejudging where I fit into the overall scheme of things?  Where am I without understanding the fabric of learning that already supports me in my quest?

MileHigh