Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[conradelektro]

While doing the "reality check" suggested by MileHigh  (output only from one of the partnered coils)  I realised that I had a bad error in the measurement set up.

Please look at the attached drawing. The error is caused by the ground connection between my scope and my function generator.

The shunt R1 (on the input side in series with the primary coil) is in a bad place, because it lifts the potential of the primary off the ground. This would not be any troble unless one measures the output with a scope, which has a ground connection to the mains ground and then to the ground of the function generator. The secondary is pulled down to ground and the output looks smaller that it is.

The error is not very big, the output was about halved. But because the output is so much lower than the input, this is no great thing.

I will redo the measurements with the shunt R1 in the right place (on the signal side, not at the ground side of the primary).

I can pre announce that MileHigh was right: If only one halve of the secondary is used for output (the second bucking halve is disconnected) we get a "normal transformer" with an output slightly lower than the input.

Greetings, Conrad

[TinselKoala]

@Void:

TK, I can try your suggestion when I get the chance, but the waveforms looked to be as expected
when changing to different vertical deflection settings.

Yes, I'm sure they do look as expected on the screen. What I'm concerned about is the possibility of a "scaling factor" in the data file that is dumped to the spreadsheet. So if you could actually look at the data files themselves, when the vertical deflection is set to 1v/div and 5v/div on the same waveform, to verify that the voltage values in the data files are the same, and not scaled by the change in vertical deflection display values, that would be very helpful.

@Conrad:

There is good news from my laboratory power supply: The Minus Pole of both DC outlets is not connected to "mains GND" and the two "Minus Poles" are also not connected to each other. But there is a "mains GND" socket at the front panel if one needs a connection to "mains GND". The housing is metal and is connected to "mains GND". The front panel with all the sockets, knobs and a little display  is plastic.

Many dual bench supplies have the ability to be set to "Independent", "Parallel", or "Series" modes. Independent means that the two sides (May be called "Master" and "Slave") are separate as you have measured and not connected together internally at all and the two sides have their own Voltage and Current Limit controls independent. "Parallel" mode may connect the two Plus Poles together and the two Minus Poles together internally, and in this mode the Master side controls the Voltage and Current Limit. "Series" mode should connect the Plus Pole of one side to the Minus pole of the other side and the total voltage will appear between the Minus Pole of one side and the Plus Pole of the other side, with "zero" at the "middle poles". This latter connection is how you set the supply up for Bipolar op-amp type or push-pull circuits. In this case usually the Master voltage and current controls set the overall voltage and current limit.

It is usually the case that none of the actual outputs are ever internally connected to the chassis/mains linecord Ground; front panel jacks are provided for this connection if needed and sometimes a little metal strap is fitted so that a true mains ground connection can be established easily if needed, by making the connection between the jacks with the strap. Often the three banana jacks for + and - and Ground are arranged in a triangle, on 3/4 inch centers. This is so a standard "Dual Banana Plug" adapter can easily be plugged in. Most DMMs will also have their jacks on 3/4 inch centers for the same reason.

[synchro1]

Thanks Conrad for your comments.  I can't respond right now, but I am going to leverage your positive and appreciative comments to do some unpleasant "dirty work."

Synchro1 - this is a call out to you:

Contrast Conrad's comments with your junk comments about me from this thread:

<<<
You're completely full of shit about practically everything!
You're betraying yourself as condescending and obnoxious to everyone on the forum and it's entire membership trivializing us as insignificant. You're that perversely sadistic to practically everyone. You act as though no one can compare to you. All your comments are over padded with conceited drivel. That's why everyone hates your guts.
You're a nut case from hell!
>>>

I am really fed up by your constant harassment and abuse.  This has been taking place off and on for more than a year.

Everyone, please look at this short YouTube clip from Synchro1:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwMwhdJE_Vg

Listen to his voice, look at his hand, look at his body movements.  Between those three clues I make him to be a man between 45 and 55 years old.

So the question is:  Why is a 50-year-old grown man acting like a psycho on this forum?

It's time for you to stop.  I am issuing a public challenge to you:

I challenge you to post here and state that you will stop harassing and abusing me.

Just make the posting saying that you are going to stop, and that will be the end of it and we can all move on.

If you ignore this posting and continue to harass and abuse me then I will do the following:

1.  When you get abusive I will say nothing except for posting the two "Syncho1 shaming and humiliation links" in response.
2.  I am asking people of good will to email Stefan asking him to kick Synchro1 off of this forum if he continues.  If enough people do this then perhaps that will stop his unacceptable behaviour.

To everyone, I am sorry to even have to make this posting but I am fed up.  I am simply totally fed up and Synchro1's behaviour is totally unacceptable, and it's doubly totally unacceptable because he is a 50-year-old grown man.

It's time for this nonsense to stop.

MileHigh

@MileHigh,

Conradelectro's just an ass kisser and you're still completely full of shit! Chris specifically asked the experimentors to examine for "Scaler Activity" in adjacency to the "Bloch Wall" of the "Bucking Coils" down in the Shumann resonant frequency range with magnet detectors. All you "Sting" racketers have done is find more ways to not get any authentic results as usual. Conrad and you both found ways to trivialize this kind magnet excitation demonstrated by Conrad last year in his "Took a Dive" Synchro coil tests.

[ramset]

HHMMmmmm
Not good, not good at all.


Syncro    please don't jump on the ice......


I don't follow you guys and your steelcage matches,but I tell you what,  you start messin with whats happening here in this thread......


Not good not good at all,right here we have People benefiting and we're trying to save
many experimenters much time ....time they don't have to waste.


Conrad has been a wonderful and level headed experimenter for quite some time
here.


and MH is helping with that too.
please take this to another thread [start a topic and discuss it there
maybe others will voice their opinions ..?]


I know every story has two sides .
please...
respectfully
Chet

[synchro1]

HHMMmmmm
Not good, not good at all.


Syncro    please don't jump on the ice......


I don't follow you guys and your steelcage matches,but I tell you what,  you start messin with whats happening here in this thread......


Not good not good at all,right here we have People benefiting and we're trying to save
many experimenters much time ....time they don't have to waste.


Conrad has been a wonderful and level headed experimenter for quite some time
here.


and MH is helping with that too.
please take this to another thread [start a topic and discuss it there
maybe others will voice their opinions ..?]


I know every story has two sides .
please...
respectfully
Chet

Well here's part of the other side: Chris started this thread, then got bullied off by that pack of condescending Trolls, and is no longer here with his advice. Now we're stuck with all the wrong ways to test the coils again as usual.