Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Pirate88179]

I thought it might be helpful to copy the 3-D schematic over: Looks ike a "Joule Ringer".

To be more specific, it looks like an early MK1 joule thief or even a Jeanna circuit JT.  What is "new" about this?

Bill

[a.king21]

If you proved me wrong then Big Ben stops chiming.  Feel free to make your case.

Well Big Ben's just missed a beat.


This is in Ukrainian, but with English subtitles.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGzR0NJ4vRE

[MileHigh]

I had to have a laugh, goodness its funny!

How many "Dummies" over at ou.com are struggling with this! All Poking Sticks! He said.... Hahaha

No wonder I left them to their misery's! I have never, in my life, met such a bunch of cry babies! Especially when many hundreds of other devices use exactly the same principals! I wonder if they can get past their frustrations and Finger pointing and make a device work

Perhaps they should replicate Bill Alek's Device and see if they can get the same measurements he demonstrated several tens of times witnessed by EE's and Engineers, that was apparently a "Measurement Error"? Or Akula0083's devices that use the same technology that also run themselves, or maybe they should stop.... Think about Why its not working, deduce it down to the most basic form and see what's going on!

One must Understand First before these devices will go OU, I have said a hundred times, its not just build and Go! Just look at the trouble Itsu has experienced, he is highly skilled with Electronics and Building Devices.

I will make an editorial comment if I may.

In the pantheon of great American film there are many classics.  And I realize that this forum is an international community and many of our friends may not be as aware of American cinema as others are because of where they grew up in the world.

One classic movie that everyone should see in their life is '12 Angry Men.'

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050083/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Another movie that is less of a mainstream classic, but very apropos and for any hard-core film buff would be considered a classic is 'Elmer Gantry.'

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053793/?ref_=nv_sr_1

There are very important issues to think about in these two movies and they apply directly to the free energy scene.  And they are truly great movies.

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

We also have to keep in mind, that there is no "negative proof". One can not proof that some idea does NOT work, it is only possible to show that it INDEED works.

The "inventor" can always say that I did something wrong. But then he should correct my error in an understandable and precise way and not by posing riddles or allegory.

While I might disagree slightly with the first part.... in principle this statement goes to the "nut" of the matter. A claimant MUST provide sufficient detail, with sufficient precision and accuracy, for others to replicate the effects that are claimed to be OU! This means precise details of construction, operation, testing and measurements! Sometimes it even means that the claimant has to present the _actual apparatus_ for independent testing.

And this is why I often make the point that the only thing preventing proper evaluation of claims like EMJ's, and others, is the _attitude of the claimant_. If the claimant is non-cooperative, then there is little we can do at our remote locations, except fiddle around blowing out components, connecting things in different ways, even failing good equipment by connecting it to bogus circuitry whose operating parameters are left as a mystery for us to decode. 

Don't worry though. In this case it has already become clear that the claimant _cannot_ produce his own evidence for any OU or even unusual behaviour from his system... he's hoping someone else can do it for him, based on his shadowy "theory" which does not even rise to the level of a coherent conjecture.

Those of us who are proceeding with builds and experimentation are just doing it for the lulz, evidently.


Let me offer a simple suggestion. Before you go out and buy a dedicated audio amplifier, or heaven forbid, you try this "stuff" with your good stereo system, build up the four-dollar push-pull circuit I have posted several times. Save yourself some money, and _if_ you should blow something with that circuit, it will only be a 75 cent transistor or a 50 cent op-amp chip. Plus you just may learn something useful in the process. The circuit is limited to 15V p-p because of the op-amp. If you need to put more than 1A at 15v p-p, you can just sub in some different transistors by the painful and complicated process of _unplugging the old ones and plugging in the new ones_.

The circuit works just fine from DC to much higher frequencies than any audio amplifier will reach, with sine or square wave input from your signal source.
The images below show, on the left oscilloscope, the _raw signal from the FG_, by direct patchcord connection from the FG's output in parallel to the signal supplied to the op-amp Pin3 input of the circuit. The right oscilloscope shows the output of the push-pull circuit as voltage drop across a 4.7 ohm 1 percent precision noninductive resistor in series with the primary coil of my testbed, with the "partnered" coils set in bucking mode by the DPDT switch.  Both scopes are set at 1v/div (RH scope direct no attenuation, LH scope using 10x atten probe). The FG is set to produce a sine or square wave at 40 kHz. The power supply is providing -7.5V - 0 - +7.5V to the push-pull board, so there is quite a bit of "headroom" left, that is by turning up the FG output you will get proportionally more output to the coil, of course.

[TinselKoala]

Well Big Ben's just missed a beat.


This is in Ukrainian, but with English subtitles.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGzR0NJ4vRE

That's pretty funny. The presenter doesn't even understand what he's presenting!
Here's the translation, from the Description of the video:

The translation from Ukrainian into English was carried out by the translator of the Translation Agency ''Aelita'' Iryna Yarosh.     1. Today, on the 29th of June of 2014, I will tell you how to build a transformer of "free energy" and I am going to test a transformer model.
2. In order to compensate the influence of the secondary winding on the primary winding of a transformer, inductance of the secondary winding is necessary to be minimal.
3. You can reduce inductance of the secondary winding by connecting several windings with subtractive polarity.
4. Consequently, total inductance of the secondary winding will be less than inductance of separate windings that comprise the secondary winding of a transformer.
5. The larger quantity of separate windings are connected in a parallel connection, the better result we receive -- reduction of inductance of the secondary winding of a transformer.
6. The sheet illustrates electric scheme of transformer connection as well as measuring instruments.
7. A transformer consists of primary winding (wire of white colour).
8. Secondary winding consists of two coils connected in series and parallel connection.
9. Light bulb will serve as a load of the secondary winding.
10. Let us switch on power supply and observe the figures of measuring instruments during the work of the transformer without the load.
11. Let us connect light bulb to the secondary winding of the transformer.
12. Now we observe the reduction of current in the primary winding of the transformer.
13. In ordinary transformers current in the primary winding is increasing if the secondary winding is loaded.

Don't you remember the question from days ago about what happens to the inductance of the "primary" winding when the secondary is shorted, with the coupled toroids?