Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Pirate88179 · February 10, 2015, 01:24:33 AM

Quote from: Magluvin on February 09, 2015, 10:42:22 PM
I think that is a fare statement. Did say from the beginning that the first part was just a first stage and not the whole kabootle, yet.

It seems to be a logical way to bring out a device by getting out some basics before a windfall of of incoming questions and attacks that would go way beyond what this thread has to show, so far. So hey, once the final product is out there, they can all be pointed here to read all about it. That would relieve some pressure.

Also, if what we have shown so far is a big ingredient in a device, without showing OU yet, Well that info is out there already. 41000 reads here, some out there are taking notes, along with the other thread and over at energetics. So once the finale happens, the the ones that were payin attn will understand how it works already.

Mags

Mags:

How can you say that? He first claimed 1.7% O.U. and later 2.5% O.U. Now, he is saying that if folks follow his design, they MIGHT discover O.U. He has not shown any proof of his initial claims. All of the replicators have demonstrated like 30% (to be kind) efficiency. No where near O.U.

A big ingredient? Maybe...possibly...but why should we think this when nothing has been shown to be any where close to this? He keeps saying that folks are on the right track and keep working....working for what? Replicating his false measurement claims?

Come on Mags...you have been around here enough to know this is not the way to go.

Bill

EMJunkie · February 10, 2015, 01:55:32 AM

Quote from: Pirate88179 on February 10, 2015, 01:24:33 AM
Mags:

How can you say that? He first claimed 1.7% O.U. and later 2.5% O.U. Now, he is saying that if folks follow his design, they MIGHT discover O.U. He has not shown any proof of his initial claims. All of the replicators have demonstrated like 30% (to be kind) efficiency. No where near O.U.

A big ingredient? Maybe...possibly...but why should we think this when nothing has been shown to be any where close to this? He keeps saying that folks are on the right track and keep working....working for what? Replicating his false measurement claims?

Come on Mags...you have been around here enough to know this is not the way to go.

Bill

Oh BillBoBaggins....

There goes the mouth again spouting off MarkE Assumptions....

Carefull, if you follow too closely, you will end up stuck in someone's rear end!!! Covered in MarkE Dung

Be your own leader Bill don't be led, especially by the Charles Holland Duell's

MarkE · February 10, 2015, 02:56:14 AM

Quote from: Pirate88179 on February 10, 2015, 01:24:33 AM
Mags:

How can you say that? He first claimed 1.7% O.U. and later 2.5% O.U.

I think you mean 1.7X and 2.5X not 1.7% and 2.5% which ironically are a lot closer to his actual efficiencies.[qutoe] Now, he is saying that if folks follow his design, they MIGHT discover O.U. He has not shown any proof of his initial claims. All of the replicators have demonstrated like 30% (to be kind) efficiency. No where near O.U.

A big ingredient? Maybe...possibly...but why should we think this when nothing has been shown to be any where close to this? He keeps saying that folks are on the right track and keep working....working for what? Replicating his false measurement claims?

Come on Mags...you have been around here enough to know this is not the way to go.

Bill
[/quote]

MarkE · February 10, 2015, 03:11:27 AM

Quote from: EMJunkie on February 10, 2015, 01:55:32 AM

Oh BillBoBaggins....

There goes the mouth again spouting off MarkE Assumptions....

Carefull, if you follow too closely, you will end up stuck in someone's rear end!!! Covered in MarkE Dung Be your own leader Bill don't be led, especially by the Charles Holland Duell's

EMJ you are really presenting yourself very badly. It is genuinely pathetic that you keep attacking CHD with a quote that no one has ever been able to show he actually said. When that urban myth surfaced in the 1930s many tried to find a credible reference and never did. In fact CHD while commissioner of patents was a big believer in the importance of technology that was rapidly advancing. If you had the slightest interest in truth you would have verified this for yourself the first time that I pointed out the problem with your claimed quote. That you merrily disparage esteemed persons with overt lies reflects very badly on you.

EMJunkie · February 10, 2015, 04:51:21 AM

Quote from: MarkE on February 10, 2015, 03:11:27 AM
EMJ you are really presenting yourself very badly. It is genuinely pathetic that you keep attacking CHD with a quote that no one has ever been able to show he actually said. When that urban myth surfaced in the 1930s many tried to find a credible reference and never did. In fact CHD while commissioner of patents was a big believer in the importance of technology that was rapidly advancing. If you had the slightest interest in truth you would have verified this for yourself the first time that I pointed out the problem with your claimed quote. That you merrily disparage esteemed persons with overt lies reflects very badly on you.

MarkE, I disagree, the mentality prescribed to by yourself, as is portrayed in the quote, is exhibited here on ou.com and else where every day.

I have gone through your posts, out of all the posts I have read, maybe two have some use for others. The rest are really, of no use to anyone.

It is sad when humans refuse to accept learning.

Perhaps the smartest Human Being, that ever lived, said:

"It is paradoxical, yet true, to say, that the more we know, the more ignorant we become in the absolute sense, for it is only through enlightenment that we become conscious of our limitations. Precisely one of the most gratifying results of intellectual evolution is the continuous opening up of new and greater prospects. - Nikola Tesla"

Every single post you show the absolute denial of furthering the Intellect of the Human Race by cutting down others that suggest something. This makes you a candidate for such behaviour!

It is up to you how you wish to be seen in the eye of others.

If you display arrogance people will see arrogance. I have no time for those that think they know everything and show no regard for others when it is others that are opening to intellectual evolution. These that are cut down by the arrogance and the stupidity of those that proclaim to be the bearer of total knowledge when it is in fact these people that are the Ball and Chain that hold others back from furthering this intellectual evolution.

You currently have knowledge that you display, but you do not show the use of it? I see your self-proclaimed, God Like attitude is really just a display of self-importance.

Maybe you could, instead, make some contributions, a gift toward greater prospects, for all of the creatures alive on this planet today!